Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
Your entire mindset is to force people to do for others what YOU want done. If you think someone that won't do for themselves deserves something, give them YOUR money voluntarily.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
because once they force women to bear unwanted children......they do not want another damn thing to do with that child.....we go from pro life....to if you can feed 'em dont breed 'em...
No, my opinion is based on objective facts about food stamps.What is factual about your op, you start it with the words I think. It's your nasty opinion only.lol you're funny dude. You think your desperate attempt at wit is supposed to make me not notice that you didn't make an actual factual rebuttal. In fact, you provided a source for all of my information. Thanks!I honestly think it is because they like feeling righteous and superior to people who they perceive to be "losers". I don't feel superior to you, but I do feel sorry.
It gives them a hard-on to say to themselves "yeah! I'm a self-made man! I'm tougher than nails! I provide for my family! I don't need hand-outs!" Sure, conservatives have never used food stamps. Could be you're on a rant, still butt- hurt over the election.
The truth is I can't wait.
that republicans don't even know who is on food stamps. Yep, you got us. Good work.
The large majority of households on food stamps have children in them, for instance. I guess we didn't know that. You're smart dude. Superior Republicans for sure. You really showed us.
Even then these people get peanuts in benefits. Appears you're exaggerating to make up a story. But you're way more smarter than us, so I may be missing the "point": A Quick Guide to SNAP Eligibility and Benefits | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Oh, and any head of the household on food stamps has a job. This makes a lot of sense. Guess I was wrong about your rant.
Also, did you notice how I said "households"? I sure as fuck did dude. Good job.
The job income eligibility is based on the total income that household makes. Neat. Just to make something of nothing because this isn't going anywhere, happen to know what qualifies as a "household" member?
It isn't based on an individual's income alone. Wow......You mean to tell me one household member earning zero while another earning a million makes a difference? Who'd have saw that coming?
A household would have to make 130% of the poverty line at the most to qualify. No shit, they have limitations. How much are you getting per month?
Now this may sound like a lot, Which part?
but it is a figure that has not kept up with the rise in inflation the last couple of decades. They raise the poverty level all the time dip shit, and 130% poverty is not a figure.
BTW: SNAP benefits cost $70.9 billion in fiscal year 2016 and supplied roughly 44.2 million Americans with an average of $125.51 for each person per month in food assistance.
No, my opinion is based on objective facts about food stamps.What is factual about your op, you start it with the words I think. It's your nasty opinion only.lol you're funny dude. You think your desperate attempt at wit is supposed to make me not notice that you didn't make an actual factual rebuttal. In fact, you provided a source for all of my information. Thanks!I honestly think it is because they like feeling righteous and superior to people who they perceive to be "losers". I don't feel superior to you, but I do feel sorry.
It gives them a hard-on to say to themselves "yeah! I'm a self-made man! I'm tougher than nails! I provide for my family! I don't need hand-outs!" Sure, conservatives have never used food stamps. Could be you're on a rant, still butt- hurt over the election.
The truth is I can't wait.
that republicans don't even know who is on food stamps. Yep, you got us. Good work.
The large majority of households on food stamps have children in them, for instance. I guess we didn't know that. You're smart dude. Superior Republicans for sure. You really showed us.
Even then these people get peanuts in benefits. Appears you're exaggerating to make up a story. But you're way more smarter than us, so I may be missing the "point": A Quick Guide to SNAP Eligibility and Benefits | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Oh, and any head of the household on food stamps has a job. This makes a lot of sense. Guess I was wrong about your rant.
Also, did you notice how I said "households"? I sure as fuck did dude. Good job.
The job income eligibility is based on the total income that household makes. Neat. Just to make something of nothing because this isn't going anywhere, happen to know what qualifies as a "household" member?
It isn't based on an individual's income alone. Wow......You mean to tell me one household member earning zero while another earning a million makes a difference? Who'd have saw that coming?
A household would have to make 130% of the poverty line at the most to qualify. No shit, they have limitations. How much are you getting per month?
Now this may sound like a lot, Which part?
but it is a figure that has not kept up with the rise in inflation the last couple of decades. They raise the poverty level all the time dip shit, and 130% poverty is not a figure.
BTW: SNAP benefits cost $70.9 billion in fiscal year 2016 and supplied roughly 44.2 million Americans with an average of $125.51 for each person per month in food assistance.
That's a stupid question. Obviously i can't alone. I can only provide my own revenue contribution like any other citizen of a country.If the cost is so nominal Billy000 - why don't you pick up the tab for it?![]()
Let me ask you this; because wages are so behind on the rising cost of inflation, how can children in poor families eat if they are not the primary beneficiaries of SNAP?I've explained this to your whiny ass a zillion times already Billy000. I want you to ask an adult to read this to you and explain it to you:
We hate SNAP because it is a violation of the U.S. Constitution. The federal government is explicitly restricted by the constitution to 18 enumerated powers and feeding the hungry is not one of those powers.
The answer will be the same when you ask an equally stupid question again tomorrow.
That'a dumb. This isn't even about me. You know that right?Why? Pick up a second job. Sell your possessions. You could do it if you really wanted to. You don't care nearly as much as you are desperate for people to believe.That's a stupid question. Obviously i can't alone. I can only provide my own revenue contribution like any other citizen of a country.If the cost is so nominal Billy000 - why don't you pick up the tab for it?![]()
Mayor de Blasio is sending the Obama administration a $35 million bill for the cost of securing Trump Tower from the time President-elect Donald Trump won the race through Jan. 20 — an average of over $400,000 a day, officials said on Monday.
Who I am and what I accept is irrelevant if I've given you objective information.My facts are objective. The RW is emotionally charged by comparison.I know facts lol. You just know what you pretend to be true about SNAP users.You fucking asshole, they use a blue link card...
If they get cash assistance, it's also on the link card
If they are swiping the link card, it's paying for the food...
If they use it immediately after that, they're using
the cash on the card to pay for the cash purchases...
I'm also a cashier...THATS HOW I FUCKING KNOW!
THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO USE 2 OR 3 CARDS...BITCH
THE ARAB STORES OVER HERE WILL TAKE YOUR LINK CARD
FOR CIGARETTES AND BOOZE AND CHARGE YOU DOUBLE!
YOU'RE BABBLING ABOUT SHIT YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT!
No. You THINK you know facts.
You are so blind you can't see that you describe yourself.