daveman
Diamond Member
I just finished reading a post in which Abraham responded to a comment by posting a graph. After realizing the person he was talking to was taking visual cues from a picture and ignoring the information in the graph...
I believe that's me you're talking about.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/envir...rming-over-the-past-20-years.html#post7831617
The information in his graph is meaningless. No source, no citations, nothing but numbers and lines that ANYONE could have simply made up.
You can accept it as valid, but you'd be taking it on faith.
And that's the problem with AGW: The science doesn't back it up, so it has to be taken on faith.