Montrovant
Fuzzy bears!
Moonbat, I've already entertained your "maybe there was a nutter" theory. If there were any such cases, they are not documented by any of the tribes I am aware of. Had there been some anomaly instance of such a person, they would have likely been expediently killed and their body burned, and probably their mother and immediate family just to be safe. Then they would have taken the ashes to someplace far away and put them in a place where only death would come in contact with them. Following all of this, the others of the tribe would probably perform some ceremonial rituals for the next months, to ensure the Great Spirit had not become angry. Now, you ask me how I could possibly know all of this? Well because it's documented this is the kind of thing they did with individuals who dared to challenge the authority of the tribal leader. To put it simply, these people would not have fucked around with your atheistic pontifications for one second. Such things were not allowed, IF they ever existed at all. As of yet, you have not given any examples of Atheist Native Americans to prove me wrong. You've presented YOUR OPINION, and that's fine... you're wrong.
And BY the way... When I said "some of us" in my previous statement, I meant some of us who are descendents of the indigenous peoples of the continent. Most non-retarded people could've figured that out without me having to spell it out. Now, I honestly do not have the time or patience to break down every little thing I say, explain what every little word means in context, clarify all the possible mistranslations your empty little noggin can conjure up, and make sure there is no possible way you can misunderstand what I say. I am accustomed to communicating with non-retards who can discern context within the scope of a conversation.
And you have presented YOUR OPINION. Even if you are right, that's what you've presented, not fact.
Yes, I did come to the conclusion that you meant some of us who have indigenous ancestry, I pointed that out in a previous post. However, if you honestly can't see how your saying 'an offensive term to some of us' would be construed to mean you are offended, that anyone who read that post would know that you were bringing up other people being offended by a term when you used the word us, then I understand why conversations with you go the way they do. You must be so self-centered that you can hardly imagine anyone coming to a different conclusion than you, or not automatically understanding what you mean no matter how you say it.
So if someone said, "Some of us find the word retard offensive" would you assume that they are telling you they have a mental handicap but don't find the word retard offensive?