Why do you want right wing judges on the bench, what do you want

[dblack]

from them?? What do you think they will do??

Protect us from people like you.

In what way? (by the way I am a law abiding citizen).

By preventing you from enforcing laws that violate the Constitution.

 

[Pete7469]

having the USA OFFICIALLY declared a "CHRISTIAN nation" with laws directly from the christian bible.....

gays and atheists back in the closet
no more evolution in schools
non-christian religions outlawed
women back in the kitchen

This is why I loathe bed wetting parrot libturds.

They repeat this bigoted lie over and over again. Are there people who vocally acknowledge that they'd like to be able to live life without seeing faggotry paraded around like some lofty virtue?

Yes.

Do they hate fags? I'm sure some of them do. Do most people, no, not even a serious percentage of the people in this country HATE faggots. They're more than tolerated anywhere they go. They're protected. Most people who just like to go on with their lives focused on getting by. The gaystapo alienates itself, and then pisses and moans when people are annoyed with them and their stupid wedding lawsuits and wanting to piss in women's shitter's just because they feel like wearing a dress that day.

It has nothing to do with mobilizing police to force anyone else's will on other people like authoritariuan libtuturds do. And when they can't get police to do it, they send Antifa thugs.

No one has mentioned evolution in schools as a serious issue since 1950 you imbecile. It's a total lie kept alive by moonbats. Everyone who knows God exists isn't worried about how the stories were told and recorded across tens of thousands of years and around the world. The fringe elements of religion are still no where near as dangerous, despotic or just fuckin mean than the militant atheists hell bent on killing Santa Claus, so they can erect statues of Santa Marx.

No one, LEAST OF ALL, Those of us Christians who revere the COTUS endorse anything about limiting any religion or cult, and if we did we would start with the most dangerous one, and that is the DNC.

.

 

[skews13]

Why the hell would anyone want Liberal activist judges on the bench?

It's been 40 years since democrats have passed any meaningful legislation. Every Marxist success of the last 4 decades is a result of the court. Abortion is a law decreed by the court, even Obama's fascist care is based on Roberts promoting it. The courts are where the Marxists craft their laws.

Yes, and somehow by some mysterious way the court found the right to same-sex marriage in the Constitution. Amazing.

Mysterious?

The Constitution grants all citizens equal protection under the law.

Please show us in the Constitution where marriage is in anyway defined.

And then show us a list of all groups of people who are excluded from equal rights.

 

[Pete7469]

They didn't win a damn thing if the Judge is centrist and follows the constitution.

You must be the most absolutely brilliant poster here who is far to the left of me.

I salute you, and I hope you're happy with life, live a long time and prosper. I mean that with all sincerity.



That judge CLERKED FOR KENNEDY!!!!!!

If the moonbats could have BEGGED for someone who would have filled the mold better, they wouldn't be able to find one. All I know about the man is he isn't reviled by the 2nd Amendment community, and for me it's the bottom line. The whole shit show they have protesting him has done nothing but alienate them from the motivated voters, as least so far as I can see. I've seen more than enough "right wing" complaints about him ruling in favor of the state on issues so I'm pretty sure we're getting a copy of the man who left the seat.

Now back to my Ruth Badger Ginsburg death vigil....

 

[Wuwei]

Yes.....conservatives like Citizens United because it protects freedom of speech.....using money to push your political agenda is a protected Right...

I agree to a certain extent.
Citizens United expanded the first amendment to include corporations as people. Super PACs can receive huge anonymous donations from the very wealthy. If you don't mind the country being controlled by large corporations and the 1%, you have a point. But it seems that billionaires in power are turning the country into an plutocracy..

 

[whitehall]

You almost have to laugh. The crazy left is so afflicted with TDS that they think the Constitution is some sort of right wing plot.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The right has won the Supreme Court for the next generation, not because they are suddenly biased to the right, but because they are now securely biased toward the Constitution.

There will be two more nominations under Trump.

I want to know what you think you won?? Please list.

The means to prevent the Democrats from fundamentally changing the United States of America.

That happens through the states, not the federal judiciary.

And since you're such a Constitutionalist, then you know it's Congress that is the check on the court, not the other way around.

Not since Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Enough states flipped from red to blue, and a solid progressive leaning Congress, and the federal judiciary is irrelevant. Decisions from the court don't mean anything if they are simply ignored by the majority of the states and the people.

That's what you Democrats thought when you "flipped" to the Confederacy. As you know, that ended badly for you.

A right leaning court does not equate to a right leaning country. As the population demographics continue to change the right leaning court is going to look out at a country that does not look like, or think like them.

Go ahead and rebel. Then it'll be clobberin' time on you. We are a nation of laws, not men.

I'm sure they will have interesting conversations with each other on how the whole country that is now operating without any regards to their decisions is all wrong, and they are right.

It would be a very short conversation.

Article 1 Section1: Strict Constitutionalist are you huh?

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Strict Constitutionalist are you huh?

Yes. You, a strict idiot.

 

[Wyatt earp]

from them?? What do you think they will do??

Just list them:

like repealing Roe v. Wade

Allow insurance companies to opt out of birth control?

Make no laws concerning guns.

End SSM

Start saying prayers in public schools.

Get rid of public schools.

End the EPA.

End ACA for good.

End all social programs , except for vets.

So the right is going to end laws they made legal???


Like Gay marriage, abortion, Obama care?



.

 

[BrokeLoser]

having the USA OFFICIALLY declared a "CHRISTIAN nation" with laws directly from the christian bible.....

gays and atheists back in the closet
no more evolution in schools
non-christian religions outlawed
women back in the kitchen

What a terrible place that would be...a predominantly white, Christian nation run on Biblical principles.
Oh the horror....said nobody sane...EVER!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes.....conservatives like Citizens United because it protects freedom of speech.....using money to push your political agenda is a protected Right...

I agree to a certain extent.
Citizens United expanded the first amendment to include corporations as people. Super PACs can receive huge anonymous donations from the very wealthy. If you don't mind the country being controlled by large corporations and the 1%, you have a point. But it seems that billionaires in power are turning the country into an plutocracy..

Evidence?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The Constitution grants all citizens equal protection under the law.

The Constitution doesn't even have the word marriage in it because it was never supposed to be a government thing, but a religious thing.

What do gays need protection of when it comes to marriage? Any two people can marry provided they find a religion willing to marry them. But it's not about marriage, it's about them cramming their issues down our throats and ignoring the will and vote of the people. That's not what a SC is supposed to do.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Stops left wing Judicial Activism................You will do as the left says by decree..............

But ..............they lost..............and this road block will last decades...............And will end up with even more coming up...........very old folks in there now.................the clock is ticking.

What about right wing Judicial activism ??

Any examples of right-wing judicial activism? I can give you plenty of the left.

 

[dave p]

from them?? What do you think they will do??

Just list them:

like repealing Roe v. Wade

Allow insurance companies to opt out of birth control?

Make no laws concerning guns.

End SSM

Start saying prayers in public schools.

Get rid of public schools.

End the EPA.

End ACA for good.

End all social programs , except for vets.

The court doesn’t make laws. You show your ignorance every day.

 

[EGR one]

Social security is one of the greatest acco mplishments this country has ever done.

Social Security was a ponzi scheme initiated by Democrats to rip off the workers. Since average life expectancy, at the time, was 63, they set the retirement age at 65, and never expected to pay out much in retirement benefits.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I want all judges to base their rulings on the law and the constitution judicial activism is not what they are on the bench for.

Their interpretation of it, you mean. I'm sure the second amendment never assumed for people to have assault weapons with huge cartridges.

Actually it was written so that citizens had equal firepower of their government.

No it was written to fight off Indians, the French and the British.

Between this post and your claim that SCOTUS makes law you're looking pretty damn stupid in this thread.

She is a Social justice warrior and as such she thinks any allegation is correct and Social Justice allows the condemning of people and denial of their rights on a perceived slight..

She is s fool as are so many who believe this crap.. The only way you defeat them is by teaching others what their lie represents... Academia is filled with these halfwits and is the reason colleges must be dismantled and a balance of opposing views restored.

These institutions must be taken over and rational thought restored.

"We don't want to see the total elimination of liberalism. We need some around to remind people of how we don't want the country to be run."
Rush Limbaugh

 

[skews13]

The Constitution grants all citizens equal protection under the law.

The Constitution doesn't even have the word marriage in it because it was never supposed to be a government thing, but a religious thing.

What do gays need protection of when it comes to marriage? Any two people can marry provided they find a religion willing to marry them. But it's not about marriage, it's about them cramming their issues down our throats and ignoring the will and vote of the people. That's not what a SC is supposed to do.

That's a contradiction in terms. The people have no vote to deny rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

It was the same reason antimiscegenation laws were struck down in 1967 in Loving v Virginia, when interracial marriage was illegal.

You don't get to tell anybody who they can or can't marry, under any circumstances in any state.

Which also falls under 14th Amendment protections.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The Constitution grants all citizens equal protection under the law.

The Constitution doesn't even have the word marriage in it because it was never supposed to be a government thing, but a religious thing.

What do gays need protection of when it comes to marriage? Any two people can marry provided they find a religion willing to marry them. But it's not about marriage, it's about them cramming their issues down our throats and ignoring the will and vote of the people. That's not what a SC is supposed to do.

That's a contradiction in terms. The people have no vote to deny rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

It was the same reason antimiscegenation laws were struck down in 1967 in Loving v Virginia, when interracial marriage was illegal.

You don't get to tell anybody who they can or can't marry, under any circumstances in any state.

Which also falls under 14th Amendment protections.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Except marriage is not a right. It's not listed in the Constitution. Marriage is the legal and religious union of one man and one woman; been that way since the founding of this country.

 

[skews13]

The Constitution grants all citizens equal protection under the law.

The Constitution doesn't even have the word marriage in it because it was never supposed to be a government thing, but a religious thing.

What do gays need protection of when it comes to marriage? Any two people can marry provided they find a religion willing to marry them. But it's not about marriage, it's about them cramming their issues down our throats and ignoring the will and vote of the people. That's not what a SC is supposed to do.

That's a contradiction in terms. The people have no vote to deny rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

It was the same reason antimiscegenation laws were struck down in 1967 in Loving v Virginia, when interracial marriage was illegal.

You don't get to tell anybody who they can or can't marry, under any circumstances in any state.

Which also falls under 14th Amendment protections.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Except marriage is not a right. It's not listed in the Constitution. Marriage is the legal and religious union of one man and one woman; been that way since the founding of this country.

Uh yes, marriage is a right. And gay people can freely do it in this country with impunity.

 

[Doc1]

The Constitution grants all citizens equal protection under the law.

The Constitution doesn't even have the word marriage in it because it was never supposed to be a government thing, but a religious thing.

What do gays need protection of when it comes to marriage? Any two people can marry provided they find a religion willing to marry them. But it's not about marriage, it's about them cramming their issues down our throats and ignoring the will and vote of the people. That's not what a SC is supposed to do.

That's a contradiction in terms. The people have no vote to deny rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

It was the same reason antimiscegenation laws were struck down in 1967 in Loving v Virginia, when interracial marriage was illegal.

You don't get to tell anybody who they can or can't marry, under any circumstances in any state.

Which also falls under 14th Amendment protections.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Except marriage is not a right. It's not listed in the Constitution. Marriage is the legal and religious union of one man and one woman; been that way since the founding of this country.

Uh yes, marriage is a right. And gay people can freely do it in this country with impunity.

How long have you and your Husband been married skewsy?

 

[PredFan]

from them?? What do you think they will do??

Just list them:

like repealing Roe v. Wade

Allow insurance companies to opt out of birth control?

Make no laws concerning guns.

End SSM

Start saying prayers in public schools.

Get rid of public schools.

End the EPA.

End ACA for good.

End all social programs , except for vets.

I want the Constitution to be interpreted as written. Not according to popular culture like the democrats do.