why does the republican party have to cheat in elections?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Our courts system has found your party guilty over and over again.

That is what this case is about.

Your right wing SCOTUS denied you deserve relief.

that means they agree you need to continue to be punished for cheating in elections

1. there was no finding of guilt in this case, you're a liar

2. you claimed at another board you were banned from here for posting this information, yet here are posting it again and are not banned, you're a liar

3. you're a liar

yes there was idiot,

the republicans were being punished for their cheating and the scotus said we wont take their case of relief
 
Our courts system has found your party guilty over and over again.

That is what this case is about.

Your right wing SCOTUS denied you deserve relief.

that means they agree you need to continue to be punished for cheating in elections

1. there was no finding of guilt in this case, you're a liar

2. you claimed at another board you were banned from here for posting this information, yet here are posting it again and are not banned, you're a liar

3. you're a liar

:eusa_whistle:
 
Our courts system has found your party guilty over and over again.

That is what this case is about.

Your right wing SCOTUS denied you deserve relief.

that means they agree you need to continue to be punished for cheating in elections

1. there was no finding of guilt in this case, you're a liar

2. you claimed at another board you were banned from here for posting this information, yet here are posting it again and are not banned, you're a liar

3. you're a liar

yes there was idiot,

the republicans were being punished for their cheating and the scotus said we wont take their case of relief

there was no finding of guilt liar, it never went to trial liar
 
In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”)
and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered
into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”),
which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to
engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC
obtains the court’s approval in advance.

there was no finding of guilt and the case is not about cheating

TM is a liar
 
In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”)
and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered
into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”),
which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to
engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC
obtains the court’s approval in advance.

there was no finding of guilt and the case is not about cheating

TM is a liar

dear idiot,

if they were not guilty why didnt they sue the dem party
 
because they KNEW they had no chance to win a case.


then they kept fucking cheating every election
 
You just deny all the court records which prove WHY they refused to sue the dem party back
 
Well, this thread has run it's usual course.

Time for a new topic.

Why does toast always land on the floor butter side down??




Sent from my white iPhone. I got rid of the black one because it wouldn't work.
 
because they KNEW they had no chance to win a case.


then they kept fucking cheating every election

you said the court said they were guilty, that is a lie, the court never said anything about their guilt, there was no finding of guilt, you LIED

AGAIN
 
In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”)
and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered
into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”),
which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to
engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC
obtains the court’s approval in advance.

there was no finding of guilt and the case is not about cheating

TM is a liar

dear idiot,

if they were not guilty why didnt they sue the dem party

you said the court said they were guilty, that is a LIE

you are a LIAR
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top