Why doesn’t the GOP just replace the SC nominee for with someone just as conservative?

This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.
Sticking to moral principles? Where is the morality in falsely accusing someone of rape?
 
Vote Kavanaugh on the USSC now and fuk these false accusers and their azzhole lawyers.
Yeah what’s a little rape here or there
Who was raped?
The 3rd victim claims gang rape. Interesting to note that you’re happy to defend attempted rape.

Very happy to defend bullshit, just call the vote and put him on the USSC. No police report? Don't go away mad, just go away.
Then he’ll be impeached, rape enabler
 
This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.



The one thing that sets kavanaugh apart from other conservative judges is that he has stated basically that the president is above the law while he's in office. Those weren't his words, I don't remember his exact words but it's something like that. He has said he doesn't believe that republican presidents can be indicted or subpoenaed.

However when it came to Clinton and a democrat he had a different point of view.

What he doesn't understand is that what they rule a republican can or can't do also applies to democratic presidents.
 
Wow, let’s slow down here folks. The only truth here is that there is very little chance we will ever “know” the truth. What we should be upset about is not the Dems playing political theatre or manipulating their duty as senators to create a result they want (pushing the nomination to after the election and hoping they can block any Trump nominee that they do not agree with politically), which anyone who is watching this play out could fairly concede. Nor should we be upset about the Republicans acting outside their constitutional obligations to block Garlands nomination. What we should be upset about is the fact that we have been duped into allowing our representatives to convince us all that this is one tribe vs another tribe for the soul of the nation.
The only relevant criteria for the Supreme Court should be, is this person a qualified jurist in constitutional law? Everything else is politics and pretty irrelevant. Whether someone is pro-choice or pro-life, a proponent of large or small government, or believes whether or not a sitting president can be indicted are all irrelevant to how that individual understands how the constitution works and the role of the SC within that context. The only part I see that is at all relevant is whether Kavanagh is lying or not. If it can be proven that he is lying (a really big if) then that should disqualify him. Truth is we will never know.
So instead of making accusations at him or his accusers, let’s call out Grassley and Feinstein for making a mockery of the one branch of government that needs to be devoid of politics if it is to work properly.
Welcome, El Rich. Nice to have you onboard.
Have a donut.
upload_2018-9-24_15-1-21.png
 
Vote Kavanaugh on the USSC now and fuk these false accusers and their azzhole lawyers.
Yeah what’s a little rape here or there
Who was raped?
The 3rd victim claims gang rape. Interesting to note that you’re happy to defend attempted rape.

Very happy to defend bullshit, just call the vote and put him on the USSC. No police report? Don't go away mad, just go away.
Then he’ll be impeached, rape enabler

You can get 2/3 of the Senate? No? Then impeachment can't happen. Go wallow in your bullshit.
 
This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.
Sticking to moral principles? Where is the morality in falsely accusing someone of rape?
Why are you so convinced the accusations are false? Are you incapable of thinking for yourself? And no, I am not convinced they are true. I just recognize that I don’t know. But I get it - papa Trump says he’s a good man so that automatically means he is.
 
Well, I think Avenatti's wild tale (possibly the result of watching too many of his porn star clients' videos) answers the OP's question: Because this is a complete and utter load of manure.
 
Vote Kavanaugh on the USSC now and fuk these false accusers and their azzhole lawyers.
Yeah what’s a little rape here or there
View attachment 218252

Avenatti has nothing read the sketchy article.
Brett Kavanaugh and pals accused of gang rapes in high school, says lawyer Michael Avenatti - NY Daily News
Avenatti was correct on the Stormy Daniels matter, I believe he is correct on this as well.
 
He isn't a rapist. He has been accused ( with no evidence ) of attempted rape. I know the truth is hard for you, but if you try it will get better with each passing day.
The 2nd victim is accusing him of rape

LIAR. Not accused of rape, just penis games when drinking. She was so drunk she had a fuzzy memory of the incident. (sounds like normal foreplay to me)

"After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said." The FBI doesn't investigate foreplay.
Senate Democrats Investigate a New Allegation of Sexual Misconduct, from the Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s College Years
You just wish he’d wave his penis in front of your face.

Is waving a penis in front of someone rape?

Then how can someone be a rapist for doing so? Not that he did
Oops I’m thinking of the 3rd victim. Claims of Kavanaugh participating in “gang rapes.”


You are a hateful idiot. If you ever get falsely accused of a crime, I hope you get the same Guilty Until Proven Innocent treatment you are supporting for Kavanaugh.
 
Yeah what’s a little rape here or there
Who was raped?
The 3rd victim claims gang rape. Interesting to note that you’re happy to defend attempted rape.

Very happy to defend bullshit, just call the vote and put him on the USSC. No police report? Don't go away mad, just go away.
Then he’ll be impeached, rape enabler

You can get 2/3 of the Senate? No? Then impeachment can't happen. Go wallow in your bullshit.
You think a few republicans won’t sign on to impeach a rapist?! Geez, you think even less of your party than I do.
 
The only vetting that should be required is the FBI sign-off. After that hurdle its a matter of qualifications. The Senators believing and investigating every bullshit HS/college escapade is stupid. The FBI cleared Kavanaugh (6) times, end of story. Vote to confirm.
Kavanaugh went through 1 full background check, the other 5 only investigated further than the 1, if something new came up, to investigate.... in this case, something new came up, and they should check this out.

The FBI also has trained experts in investigating alleged sexual assaults... that they could use.
When Clarence Thomas was accused of sexual harassment during his nomination process, President Bush assigned the FBI to investigate his nominee in a matter of days. He did not hesitate.
it turns out, the Republicans were made aware of the 2nd accuser of the lewd actions that came out in the New Yorker yesterday, knew this last week....

instead of calling for an investigation by the FBI, the crooked Republicans decided to rush though to a vote, before these 2nd allegations came out....

that's why they were pushing for Dr.Ford to testify immediately without giving her the courtesy, and time she needed to prepare...

and why there is no FBI interviews being done.
Well, now that the cat's out of the bag, let's start the investigation(s) today.

Maybe YOU can tell us: start the investigation WHERE? HOW? Exactly WHAT has Ford given anyone to tell an investigator where to start? What magic is it people like you think investigators have to make something out of this farrago of vague shadows she's offered?
Do you think the FBI always has everything laid out for them nice and neat when they get started? Did they know the who/what/when/where/why of the Russian interference in our election the day they began?
They can figure it out and if it is NOT POSSIBLE for them to come up with anything one way or the other, that is also important to know for the record. It is not up to you to prejudge based on what we've read in the newspaper.
 
This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.

Why doesn’t the GOP just replace the SC nominee for with someone just as conservative?

The PTB within the GOP have decided that sexual misconduct, sexual assault, sexual harassment, rape, etc. are all acceptable so, they won't need to do that.
 
The 2nd victim is accusing him of rape

LIAR. Not accused of rape, just penis games when drinking. She was so drunk she had a fuzzy memory of the incident. (sounds like normal foreplay to me)

"After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said." The FBI doesn't investigate foreplay.
Senate Democrats Investigate a New Allegation of Sexual Misconduct, from the Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s College Years
You just wish he’d wave his penis in front of your face.

Is waving a penis in front of someone rape?

Then how can someone be a rapist for doing so? Not that he did
Oops I’m thinking of the 3rd victim. Claims of Kavanaugh participating in “gang rapes.”


You are a hateful idiot. If you ever get falsely accused of a crime, I hope you get the same Guilty Until Proven Innocent treatment you are supporting for Kavanaugh.
I will never be accused of rape. I was not raised poorly like Kavanaugh was. In my household, no meant no.
 
LIAR. Not accused of rape, just penis games when drinking. She was so drunk she had a fuzzy memory of the incident. (sounds like normal foreplay to me)

"After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said." The FBI doesn't investigate foreplay.
Senate Democrats Investigate a New Allegation of Sexual Misconduct, from the Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s College Years
You just wish he’d wave his penis in front of your face.

Is waving a penis in front of someone rape?

Then how can someone be a rapist for doing so? Not that he did
Oops I’m thinking of the 3rd victim. Claims of Kavanaugh participating in “gang rapes.”


You are a hateful idiot. If you ever get falsely accused of a crime, I hope you get the same Guilty Until Proven Innocent treatment you are supporting for Kavanaugh.
I will never be accused of rape. I was not raised poorly like Kavanaugh was. In my household, no meant no.


Here's the problem. That doesn't matter. If any woman anywhere accuses you, you are Guilty Until Proven Innocent according to the New Rules you support.
 
If MD police indict and convict him of rape then he's a rapist.
Right now there is no crime to investigate, just lawyers chasing headlines.
The FBI background check was clear, so just vote Kavanaugh on the USSC, and stop this Duke Lacross Team bullshit.
 
This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.
And the point of that would be what? You idiots would just act like children with the next one too.
Let us all make note that objecting to man's sexual assault of women is "acting like children."
 

Forum List

Back
Top