Why doesn’t the GOP just replace the SC nominee for with someone just as conservative?

[Cecilie1200]

This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.

The one thing that sets kavanaugh apart from other conservative judges is that he has stated basically that the president is above the law while he's in office. Those weren't his words, I don't remember his exact words but it's something like that. He has said he doesn't believe that republican presidents can be indicted or subpoenaed.

However when it came to Clinton and a democrat he had a different point of view.

What he doesn't understand is that what they rule a republican can or can't do also applies to democratic presidents.

I just heard, "Anything is okay, because I'm sure I heard somewhere that Kavanaugh thinks this, I don't know where it was or what he actually said, but I KNOW."

What I don't understand is why you feel okay coming in here and making definitive statements about how what Kavanaugh said was wrong, right after admitting that you don't know what he said.

Let me help you out, sweetie, and don't say I never did anything for you. Here's what Kavanaugh actually said:

“It would be appropriate for Congress to enact a statute providing that any personal civil suits against presidents, like certain members of the military, be deferred while the President is in office."

He also said that criminal investigations are so likely to become political in nature, that they should also be deferred until the President leaves office. One presumes that, if there were sufficient evidence against the President to bring criminal charges, he would leave office by way of impeachment or resignation, although these days, we can't be sure of anything.

So no, he did not suggest that the President is "above the law". He suggested that the law could be twisted into a political weapon. And given what has subsequently happened to HIM, can you really say he was wrong?

 

[BlackFlag]

You just wish he’d wave his penis in front of your face.

Is waving a penis in front of someone rape?

Then how can someone be a rapist for doing so? Not that he did

Oops I’m thinking of the 3rd victim. Claims of Kavanaugh participating in “gang rapes.”

You are a hateful idiot. If you ever get falsely accused of a crime, I hope you get the same Guilty Until Proven Innocent treatment you are supporting for Kavanaugh.

I will never be accused of rape. I was not raised poorly like Kavanaugh was. In my household, no meant no.

Here's the problem. That doesn't matter. If any woman anywhere accuses you, you are Guilty Until Proven Innocent according to the New Rules you support.

She would need to pass a polygraph, be vetted for months, and find people in my life that say it’s in line with my behavior at the time they claim it happened. None of those will ever happen.

 

[Faun]

McConnell called it the "Biden Rule" meaning no confirmations in a presidential election year. Not Karma, just politics. McConnell and Grassley need to call the vote and ram Kavanaugh thru. Then forever after, control of the Senate controls who gets on the USSC. The out party can pound sand. There will be accusers galore to stop any opposition party nominee.

Biden never said, “no confirmations in an election year.”

Like I always say, if rightards didn’t lie, they’d have nothing to post.

wrong, see below
Biden in 1992 on Supreme Court Vacancy

LOLOL

Moron.... nowhere in there did Biden say Bush would be denied a SCOTUS replacement for the rest of his presidency, like McConnell said to Obama.

Rightards are dumber than dirt.

 

[Hellokitty]

This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.

If they withdraw the nomination before allowing Kavanaugh a chance to defend himself from political smear attacks, who is going to accept a nomination in the future knowing they will be falsely attacked by mentally unstable democrats?

 

[bodecea]

You just wish he’d wave his penis in front of your face.

Is waving a penis in front of someone rape?

Then how can someone be a rapist for doing so? Not that he did

Oops I’m thinking of the 3rd victim. Claims of Kavanaugh participating in “gang rapes.”

You are a hateful idiot. If you ever get falsely accused of a crime, I hope you get the same Guilty Until Proven Innocent treatment you are supporting for Kavanaugh.

I will never be accused of rape. I was not raised poorly like Kavanaugh was. In my household, no meant no.

Here's the problem. That doesn't matter. If any woman anywhere accuses you, you are Guilty Until Proven Innocent according to the New Rules you support.

Nope....that is not even close to true.

 

[Faun]

Yeah what’s a little rape here or there

Who was raped?

The 3rd victim claims gang rape. Interesting to note that you’re happy to defend attempted rape.

Very happy to defend bullshit, just call the vote and put him on the USSC. No police report? Don't go away mad, just go away.

Then he’ll be impeached, rape enabler

You can get 2/3 of the Senate? No? Then impeachment can't happen. Go wallow in your bullshit.

Holyfuckingshit!

You really are dumber than dirt. Impeachment happens in the House, not the Senate. The Senate tries the impeachment — only after a president is impeached.

 

[bodecea]

This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.

If they withdraw the nomination before allowing Kavanaugh a chance to defend himself from political smear attacks, who is going to accept a nomination in the future knowing they will be falsely attacked by mentally unstable democrats?

Yes, let Kavanaugh defend himself......why isn't he pushing for the FBI to exonerate him?

 

[EL Rich]

Wow, let’s slow down here folks. The only truth here is that there is very little chance we will ever “know” the truth. What we should be upset about is not the Dems playing political theatre or manipulating their duty as senators to create a result they want (pushing the nomination to after the election and hoping they can block any Trump nominee that they do not agree with politically), which anyone who is watching this play out could fairly concede. Nor should we be upset about the Republicans acting outside their constitutional obligations to block Garlands nomination. What we should be upset about is the fact that we have been duped into allowing our representatives to convince us all that this is one tribe vs another tribe for the soul of the nation.
The only relevant criteria for the Supreme Court should be, is this person a qualified jurist in constitutional law? Everything else is politics and pretty irrelevant. Whether someone is pro-choice or pro-life, a proponent of large or small government, or believes whether or not a sitting president can be indicted are all irrelevant to how that individual understands how the constitution works and the role of the SC within that context. The only part I see that is at all relevant is whether Kavanagh is lying or not. If it can be proven that he is lying (a really big if) then that should disqualify him. Truth is we will never know.
So instead of making accusations at him or his accusers, let’s call out Grassley and Feinstein for making a mockery of the one branch of government that needs to be devoid of politics if it is to work properly.

Welcome, El Rich. Nice to have you onboard.
Have a donut.
View attachment 218254

Cheers!

 

[dave p]

Who was raped?

The 3rd victim claims gang rape. Interesting to note that you’re happy to defend attempted rape.

Very happy to defend bullshit, just call the vote and put him on the USSC. No police report? Don't go away mad, just go away.

Then he’ll be impeached, rape enabler

You can get 2/3 of the Senate? No? Then impeachment can't happen. Go wallow in your bullshit.

You think a few republicans won’t sign on to impeach a rapist?! Geez, you think even less of your party than I do.

Youre a moron. and a liar.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Kavanaugh went through 1 full background check, the other 5 only investigated further than the 1, if something new came up, to investigate.... in this case, something new came up, and they should check this out.

The FBI also has trained experts in investigating alleged sexual assaults... that they could use.

When Clarence Thomas was accused of sexual harassment during his nomination process, President Bush assigned the FBI to investigate his nominee in a matter of days. He did not hesitate.

it turns out, the Republicans were made aware of the 2nd accuser of the lewd actions that came out in the New Yorker yesterday, knew this last week....

instead of calling for an investigation by the FBI, the crooked Republicans decided to rush though to a vote, before these 2nd allegations came out....

that's why they were pushing for Dr.Ford to testify immediately without giving her the courtesy, and time she needed to prepare...

and why there is no FBI interviews being done.

Well, now that the cat's out of the bag, let's start the investigation(s) today.

Maybe YOU can tell us: start the investigation WHERE? HOW? Exactly WHAT has Ford given anyone to tell an investigator where to start? What magic is it people like you think investigators have to make something out of this farrago of vague shadows she's offered?

Do you think the FBI always has everything laid out for them nice and neat when they get started? Did they know the who/what/when/where/why of the Russian interference in our election the day they began?
They can figure it out and if it is NOT POSSIBLE for them to come up with anything one way or the other, that is also important to know for the record. It is not up to you to prejudge based on what we've read in the newspaper.

"Laid out nice and neat"? All I suggested is that they need some sort of lead to investigate. Now if you're done building me straw men about what they DON'T need, perhaps you could stop dodging the question and answer it. Do not give me "They can figure something out". That's exactly what I just got done saying: you think there's some mysterious magic that the FBI has that ordinary people cannot imagine. Possibly little fairies flit by and bring them notes full of sparkly dust, or they consult the Oracle of Delphi.

The truth is, they do what cops and private investigators everywhere do: they take the victim's statement, and then they follow up on the information provided. And if no information is provided, they say, "I'm sorry, there's nothing to go on here." FBI agents are just humans; they're not Time Cops, hopping in their time machine to go back and follow Brett Kavanaugh around 1982 to find out where he went and what he did.

 

[g5000]

Vote Kavanaugh on the USSC now and fuk these false accusers and their azzhole lawyers.

Yeah what’s a little rape here or there

View attachment 218252

Too small to read.

Here you go:

 

[Hellokitty]

This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.

If they withdraw the nomination before allowing Kavanaugh a chance to defend himself from political smear attacks, who is going to accept a nomination in the future knowing they will be falsely attacked by mentally unstable democrats?

Yes, let Kavanaugh defend himself......why isn't he pushing for the FBI to exonerate him?

What is the FBI supposed to investigate, none of the liberal nut jobs have filed a criminal complaint?

 

[Lesh]

This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.

If they withdraw the nomination before allowing Kavanaugh a chance to defend himself from political smear attacks, who is going to accept a nomination in the future knowing they will be falsely attacked by mentally unstable democrats?

Yes, let Kavanaugh defend himself......why isn't he pushing for the FBI to exonerate him?

What is the FBI supposed to investigate, none of the liberal nut jobs have filed a criminal complaint?

A SCOTUS confirmation hearing is about character and ethics.

It's not a criminal trial

 

[dave p]

Is waving a penis in front of someone rape?

Then how can someone be a rapist for doing so? Not that he did

Oops I’m thinking of the 3rd victim. Claims of Kavanaugh participating in “gang rapes.”

You are a hateful idiot. If you ever get falsely accused of a crime, I hope you get the same Guilty Until Proven Innocent treatment you are supporting for Kavanaugh.

I will never be accused of rape. I was not raised poorly like Kavanaugh was. In my household, no meant no.

Here's the problem. That doesn't matter. If any woman anywhere accuses you, you are Guilty Until Proven Innocent according to the New Rules you support.

She would need to pass a polygraph, be vetted for months, and find people in my life that say it’s in line with my behavior at the time they claim it happened. None of those will ever happen.

Then why in your mind is kavanaugh guilty when none of what you says needs to happen has happened?

 

[BlackFlag]

Oops I’m thinking of the 3rd victim. Claims of Kavanaugh participating in “gang rapes.”

You are a hateful idiot. If you ever get falsely accused of a crime, I hope you get the same Guilty Until Proven Innocent treatment you are supporting for Kavanaugh.

I will never be accused of rape. I was not raised poorly like Kavanaugh was. In my household, no meant no.

Here's the problem. That doesn't matter. If any woman anywhere accuses you, you are Guilty Until Proven Innocent according to the New Rules you support.

She would need to pass a polygraph, be vetted for months, and find people in my life that say it’s in line with my behavior at the time they claim it happened. None of those will ever happen.

Then why in your mind is kavanaugh guilty when none of what you says needs to happen has happened?

Those things did happen. That’s why I wrote so specifically.

 

[Cecilie1200]

This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.

Why doesn’t the GOP just replace the SC nominee for with someone just as conservative?

The PTB within the GOP have decided that sexual misconduct, sexual assault, sexual harassment, rape, etc. are all acceptable so, they won't need to do that.

Actually, the Powers That Be in the GOP have decided that centuries of jurisprudence in which the accused is innocent until proven guilty is far better than your "guilt by innuendo" scenario, so they won't need to do that.

As a previous victim of sexual assault myself, I spit on your callous, cynical attempts to cloak your political dirty tricks in respectability at the expense of me and women like me.

 

[dave p]

You are a hateful idiot. If you ever get falsely accused of a crime, I hope you get the same Guilty Until Proven Innocent treatment you are supporting for Kavanaugh.

I will never be accused of rape. I was not raised poorly like Kavanaugh was. In my household, no meant no.

Here's the problem. That doesn't matter. If any woman anywhere accuses you, you are Guilty Until Proven Innocent according to the New Rules you support.

She would need to pass a polygraph, be vetted for months, and find people in my life that say it’s in line with my behavior at the time they claim it happened. None of those will ever happen.

Then why in your mind is kavanaugh guilty when none of what you says needs to happen has happened?

Those things did happen. That’s why I wrote so specifically.

No they haven't. Again you lie like a rug.

 

[Avatar4321]

Kavanaugh needs to be confirmed ASAP to quash the double standard the dems are trying to establish. The FBI would uncover anything serious in their background checks. If cleared by the FBI, no false claims should be allowed.

Supreme Court Justice Garland.

When did republicans falsely accuse Garland of attempted rape?

They denied even a nomination hearing for Garland.

Karma's a bitch.

You’re comparing exercising their check on the government and not wasting time on a hearing for a candidate who never had the votes to falsely accusing a qualified candidate of sexual abuse?

 

[bodecea]

The 4 Fs was likely uttered by every heterosexual male who walked the planet
You poor losers and fakes never got any and just want to rail at those who did.

I would question your source on that. Unless you are saying all heterosexual males are scum.

 

[Crixus]

This is how batshit crazy the GOP is. They would rather “own the libs” than stick to any kind of moral principle and just replace him with some other right wing nut job.

I’m all for it though. The two moderate republican female senators will likely vote no when the confirmation comes thus putting the GOP into further turmoil. Yay for that.

Because the same thing would happen over and over again. This is a good thing what the demtards are doing.

1. The Republican Party are like old Baptist churches. The old guard like John McTumor, McConnel and so on will get old and die, and because the democrats are doing this shit, the younger more radical republicans will start to be seated. Then all will even out.


2. This obviously fake claim by this ford lady will take the sting out of sex issues much like the democrats over used the word “Racist” and it will cease to matter as well.


All that because the DNC sees it’s power slipping away.