Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I asked for the facts supposedly being ignored. let's see them? Make sure not to mention the FBI director stating that Hildabeast lied. make sure to eliminate that one.And oh wait, Benghazi was a lie perpetrated by hildabeast on her lie about root cause due to a video. She even admitted it. you're just a hypocrite. Admit it.To answer your question though they don't care about facts, much like you don't, for exactly the same reasons. Emotion
Revisiting Clinton and Classified InformationI asked for the facts supposedly being ignored. let's see them? Make sure not to mention the FBI director stating that Hildabeast lied. make sure to eliminate that one.And oh wait, Benghazi was a lie perpetrated by hildabeast on her lie about root cause due to a video. She even admitted it. you're just a hypocrite. Admit it.To answer your question though they don't care about facts, much like you don't, for exactly the same reasons. Emotion
hypocritical oath of Clinton.Why facts don’t matter to Trump’s supporters
How did Donald Trump win the Republican nomination, despite clear evidence that he had misrepresented or falsified key issues throughout the campaign? Social scientists have some intriguing explanations for why people persist in misjudgments despite strong contrary evidence.
Trump is a vivid and, to his critics, a frightening present-day illustration of this perception problem. But it has been studied carefully by researchers for more than 30 years. Basically, the studies show that attempts to refute false information often backfire and lead people to hold on to their misperceptions even more strongly.
-------------
An interesting article. They even use vaccines as an example.
Another perfect example:
------------------
They documented what they called a “backfire effect” by showing the persistence of the belief that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in 2005 and 2006, after the United States had publicly admitted that they didn’t exist. “The results show that direct factual contradictions can actually strengthen ideologically grounded factual belief,” they wrote.
-----------------
You have your facts. I have my beliefs. Beliefs trump facts.
Actually the photo in the article says it all -- wait, I mean, "has the best words" ---
Article text:
>> This “confirmation bias” was outlined in a 1979 article by psychologist Charles Lord, cited by Graves. Lord found that his test subjects, when asked questions about capital punishment, responded with answers shaped by their prior beliefs. “Instead of changing their minds, most will dig in their heels and cling even more firmly to their originally held views,” Graves explained in summarizing the study. <<Doesn't that sound a wee bit familiar not just about Rump but about this message board in general...
LOL FBI director, she lied. baddaboomRevisiting Clinton and Classified InformationI asked for the facts supposedly being ignored. let's see them? Make sure not to mention the FBI director stating that Hildabeast lied. make sure to eliminate that one.And oh wait, Benghazi was a lie perpetrated by hildabeast on her lie about root cause due to a video. She even admitted it. you're just a hypocrite. Admit it.To answer your question though they don't care about facts, much like you don't, for exactly the same reasons. Emotion
Hilarious coming forming a Hillary cheerleader.Why facts don’t matter to Trump’s supporters
How did Donald Trump win the Republican nomination, despite clear evidence that he had misrepresented or falsified key issues throughout the campaign? Social scientists have some intriguing explanations for why people persist in misjudgments despite strong contrary evidence.
Trump is a vivid and, to his critics, a frightening present-day illustration of this perception problem. But it has been studied carefully by researchers for more than 30 years. Basically, the studies show that attempts to refute false information often backfire and lead people to hold on to their misperceptions even more strongly.
-------------
An interesting article. They even use vaccines as an example.
Another perfect example:
------------------
They documented what they called a “backfire effect” by showing the persistence of the belief that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in 2005 and 2006, after the United States had publicly admitted that they didn’t exist. “The results show that direct factual contradictions can actually strengthen ideologically grounded factual belief,” they wrote.
-----------------
You have your facts. I have my beliefs. Beliefs trump facts.
Why facts don’t matter to Trump’s supporters
How did Donald Trump win the Republican nomination, despite clear evidence that he had misrepresented or falsified key issues throughout the campaign? Social scientists have some intriguing explanations for why people persist in misjudgments despite strong contrary evidence.
Trump is a vivid and, to his critics, a frightening present-day illustration of this perception problem. But it has been studied carefully by researchers for more than 30 years. Basically, the studies show that attempts to refute false information often backfire and lead people to hold on to their misperceptions even more strongly.
-------------
An interesting article. They even use vaccines as an example.
Another perfect example:
------------------
They documented what they called a “backfire effect” by showing the persistence of the belief that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in 2005 and 2006, after the United States had publicly admitted that they didn’t exist. “The results show that direct factual contradictions can actually strengthen ideologically grounded factual belief,” they wrote.
-----------------
You have your facts. I have my beliefs. Beliefs trump facts.
LOL FBI director, she lied. baddaboomRevisiting Clinton and Classified InformationI asked for the facts supposedly being ignored. let's see them? Make sure not to mention the FBI director stating that Hildabeast lied. make sure to eliminate that one.And oh wait, Benghazi was a lie perpetrated by hildabeast on her lie about root cause due to a video. She even admitted it. you're just a hypocrite. Admit it.To answer your question though they don't care about facts, much like you don't, for exactly the same reasons. Emotion
Gowdy, July 7: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?LOL FBI director, she lied. baddaboomRevisiting Clinton and Classified InformationI asked for the facts supposedly being ignored. let's see them? Make sure not to mention the FBI director stating that Hildabeast lied. make sure to eliminate that one.And oh wait, Benghazi was a lie perpetrated by hildabeast on her lie about root cause due to a video. She even admitted it. you're just a hypocrite. Admit it.To answer your question though they don't care about facts, much like you don't, for exactly the same reasons. Emotion
Except he was wrong...here, I'll show you.
For example, Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy asked Comey if Clinton was telling the truth when she said that she did not send or receive marked classified material. Comey said she wasn’t.
Gowdy, July 7: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?
Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.
But later in the hearing, Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman asked Comey if he knew that the State Department had said that the emails were marked classified in error. Comey replied, “No.”
Here, I'll show you twice:
Cartwright, July 7: So, if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified and we’re following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
Gowdy, July 7: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?LOL FBI director, she lied. baddaboomRevisiting Clinton and Classified InformationI asked for the facts supposedly being ignored. let's see them? Make sure not to mention the FBI director stating that Hildabeast lied. make sure to eliminate that one.And oh wait, Benghazi was a lie perpetrated by hildabeast on her lie about root cause due to a video. She even admitted it. you're just a hypocrite. Admit it.To answer your question though they don't care about facts, much like you don't, for exactly the same reasons. Emotion
Except he was wrong...here, I'll show you.
For example, Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy asked Comey if Clinton was telling the truth when she said that she did not send or receive marked classified material. Comey said she wasn’t.
Gowdy, July 7: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?
Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.
But later in the hearing, Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman asked Comey if he knew that the State Department had said that the emails were marked classified in error. Comey replied, “No.”
Here, I'll show you twice:
Cartwright, July 7: So, if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified and we’re following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.
Baddaboom, baby.
were they marked or not? Thank youGowdy, July 7: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?LOL FBI director, she lied. baddaboomRevisiting Clinton and Classified InformationI asked for the facts supposedly being ignored. let's see them? Make sure not to mention the FBI director stating that Hildabeast lied. make sure to eliminate that one.And oh wait, Benghazi was a lie perpetrated by hildabeast on her lie about root cause due to a video. She even admitted it. you're just a hypocrite. Admit it.
Except he was wrong...here, I'll show you.
For example, Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy asked Comey if Clinton was telling the truth when she said that she did not send or receive marked classified material. Comey said she wasn’t.
Gowdy, July 7: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?
Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.
But later in the hearing, Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman asked Comey if he knew that the State Department had said that the emails were marked classified in error. Comey replied, “No.”
Here, I'll show you twice:
Cartwright, July 7: So, if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified and we’re following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.
Baddaboom, baby.
Dont forget the next line which I already posted but you left it off...by accident:
But later in the hearing, Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman asked Comey if he knew that the State Department had said that the emails were marked classified in error. Comey replied, “No.”
Revisiting Clinton and Classified InformationI asked for the facts supposedly being ignored. let's see them? Make sure not to mention the FBI director stating that Hildabeast lied. make sure to eliminate that one.And oh wait, Benghazi was a lie perpetrated by hildabeast on her lie about root cause due to a video. She even admitted it. you're just a hypocrite. Admit it.To answer your question though they don't care about facts, much like you don't, for exactly the same reasons. Emotion
What lies are those?Holy shit its the mother of all IRONY threads considering the lies Hillary has told.
they were marked classified but incorrectly marked classified. Dude, it doesn't get any better than that lie right there.What lies are those?Holy shit its the mother of all IRONY threads considering the lies Hillary has told.
Do you need the video of the FBI director detailing hillarys lies again? That's just on the email scandal and we have decades of her lying. Talk about denying facts
It does get kind of frustrating when good people sometimes and accidently don't tell the truth. That happens sometimes because people make mistakes in their recollection but most people are quick to correct it when they realize that they have not tole the truth. What I hate a lot about politics is that people on BOTH sides tend to purposely lie in order to promote their candidate. The problem with that is that the public is basing their assessment of the candidate on something that just isn't real and these lies tend to build mistrust in the entire process. This mistrust builds to the point where anything that is said is treated as a lie and this provides cannon fodder for your opponents. The moral of the story is that even politicians should tell the truth.
Couldn't think of any beyond "she heard sniper fire" and "she heard sniper fire".What lies are those?Holy shit its the mother of all IRONY threads considering the lies Hillary has told.
^^^
