Why is First Woman, and First Homo such a political issue of Importance today?. Should it not be best qualified.?

[BrokeLoser]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

It's less racist to have a cabinet that resembles the people they are leading than an overwhelming number of white males. Democrats are multi-racial, much, much more so than Republicans so their pool of qualified candidates is gong to look a little different.

Come on now...you’ve been pushing hard for straight answers all the way through this thread....Give it to me straight.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

I've provided nothing but straight answers and multiple times to the same questions when my previous answer wasn't accepted.

Name someone not qualified, let's talk about them. We can start with this guy

View attachment 430715

It’s awfully bizarre that such a simple question has you so twisted and confused. My guess is you’re scared shitless to answer it...hmm, I wonder why?

“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

For starters I disagree with the premise of your question. I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then.

Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it. Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified.

Even Harry had to go back 20 years to find a Transportation Secretary that Harry thought was qualified and that was a black guy in the Clinton administration

I’m thinking you’re overly “WOKE”.
I’m gonna do you a favor and share a video with you, watch it, do a little self reflecting afterwards...I hoping you’ll be able to see how normal sane people perceive you Super WOKEOLOGISTS.
Remember, sane folks know, racism can’t be beat with racism.
Here you go...you’re welcome in advance.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

It's less racist to have a cabinet that resembles the people they are leading than an overwhelming number of white males. Democrats are multi-racial, much, much more so than Republicans so their pool of qualified candidates is gong to look a little different.

Come on now...you’ve been pushing hard for straight answers all the way through this thread....Give it to me straight.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

I've provided nothing but straight answers and multiple times to the same questions when my previous answer wasn't accepted.

Name someone not qualified, let's talk about them. We can start with this guy

View attachment 430715

It’s awfully bizarre that such a simple question has you so twisted and confused. My guess is you’re scared shitless to answer it...hmm, I wonder why?

“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

For starters I disagree with the premise of your question. I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then.

Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it. Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified.

Even Harry had to go back 20 years to find a Transportation Secretary that Harry thought was qualified and that was a black guy in the Clinton administration

"For starters I disagree with the premise of your question."
Hold on a minute, you disagree with the premise of my question so therefore you don't or can't answer it?

"I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then."
I've made my position crystal clear...quotas or hiring on skin color, has no place in government or business.

"Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it."
He has said openly that he will hire on skin color first....That's considered RACIST by anyone even half sane.

"Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified."
This white male isn't qualified because you and or CNN said so?

Here, give it one more try....
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

It's less racist to have a cabinet that resembles the people they are leading than an overwhelming number of white males. Democrats are multi-racial, much, much more so than Republicans so their pool of qualified candidates is gong to look a little different.

Come on now...you’ve been pushing hard for straight answers all the way through this thread....Give it to me straight.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

I've provided nothing but straight answers and multiple times to the same questions when my previous answer wasn't accepted.

Name someone not qualified, let's talk about them. We can start with this guy

View attachment 430715

It’s awfully bizarre that such a simple question has you so twisted and confused. My guess is you’re scared shitless to answer it...hmm, I wonder why?

“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

For starters I disagree with the premise of your question. I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then.

Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it. Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified.

Even Harry had to go back 20 years to find a Transportation Secretary that Harry thought was qualified and that was a black guy in the Clinton administration

"For starters I disagree with the premise of your question."
Hold on a minute, you disagree with the premise of my question so therefore you don't or can't answer it?

Yes. I don't know of anyone who was nominated by Biden based only on race.

"I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then."

I've made my position crystal clear...quotas or hiring on skin color, has no place in government or business.

Can you point to the quota that Biden is using? There are qualified candidates who are not white and male. There is nothing wrong with celebrating the hiring of those people if and when it is new until it isn't.

"Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it."

He has said openly that he will hire on skin color first....That's considered RACIST by anyone even half sane.

He said his cabinet would be diverse, that's not racism. He's found qualified people. You don't like them but nobody cares. You also don't seem to care when Trump didn't hire the best people, not a squeak from you.

"Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified."

This white male isn't qualified because you and or CNN said so?

No, because Whittaker literally was not qualified. In order to become an acting Attorney General w/out senate approval is if you are either Deputy AG, if you are already in the Dept. of Justice and have a job that required senate approval or if he were a recess appointee. The senate was not in recess. He literally did not meet the legal requirements. Plus his experience sucked .But did you care that he wasn't qualified? Nope.

But hey, he was white so I can see why you looked over it.

Here, give it one more try....
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

Again, disagree with the question but if you're asking if that is the definition of racism, no it's not. Buy a dictionary.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

It's less racist to have a cabinet that resembles the people they are leading than an overwhelming number of white males. Democrats are multi-racial, much, much more so than Republicans so their pool of qualified candidates is gong to look a little different.

Come on now...you’ve been pushing hard for straight answers all the way through this thread....Give it to me straight.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

I've provided nothing but straight answers and multiple times to the same questions when my previous answer wasn't accepted.

Name someone not qualified, let's talk about them. We can start with this guy

View attachment 430715

It’s awfully bizarre that such a simple question has you so twisted and confused. My guess is you’re scared shitless to answer it...hmm, I wonder why?

“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

For starters I disagree with the premise of your question. I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then.

Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it. Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified.

Even Harry had to go back 20 years to find a Transportation Secretary that Harry thought was qualified and that was a black guy in the Clinton administration

"For starters I disagree with the premise of your question."
Hold on a minute, you disagree with the premise of my question so therefore you don't or can't answer it?

Yes. I don't know of anyone who was nominated by Biden based only on race.

"I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then."

I've made my position crystal clear...quotas or hiring on skin color, has no place in government or business.

Can you point to the quota that Biden is using? There are qualified candidates who are not white and male. There is nothing wrong with celebrating the hiring of those people if and when it is new until it isn't.

"Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it."

He has said openly that he will hire on skin color first....That's considered RACIST by anyone even half sane.

He said his cabinet would be diverse, that's not racism. He's found qualified people. You don't like them but nobody cares. You also don't seem to care when Trump didn't hire the best people, not a squeak from you.

"Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified."

This white male isn't qualified because you and or CNN said so?

No, because Whittaker literally was not qualified. In order to become an acting Attorney General w/out senate approval is if you are either Deputy AG, if you are already in the Dept. of Justice and have a job that required senate approval or if he were a recess appointee. The senate was not in recess. He literally did not meet the legal requirements. Plus his experience sucked .But did you care that he wasn't qualified? Nope.

But hey, he was white so I can see why you looked over it.

Here, give it one more try....
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

Again, disagree with the question but if you're asking if that is the definition of racism, no it's not. Buy a dictionary.

You're being being completely dishonest now.
Biden said his VP would be a black woman before he ever interviewed anybody....That's racist and discriminatory.

I said: “Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”
You said: Again, disagree with the question but if you're asking if that is the definition of racism, no it's not. Buy a dictionary.

Let me teach you something using an elementary method....
A business owner tells a potential employee that they need not apply for the advertised job opening since their skin isn't the color they are looking for to fill the current position.

Are you sure the business owner isn't being racist?
Would your answer depend on the color of the skin of the potential employee?

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

It's less racist to have a cabinet that resembles the people they are leading than an overwhelming number of white males. Democrats are multi-racial, much, much more so than Republicans so their pool of qualified candidates is gong to look a little different.

Come on now...you’ve been pushing hard for straight answers all the way through this thread....Give it to me straight.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

I've provided nothing but straight answers and multiple times to the same questions when my previous answer wasn't accepted.

Name someone not qualified, let's talk about them. We can start with this guy

View attachment 430715

It’s awfully bizarre that such a simple question has you so twisted and confused. My guess is you’re scared shitless to answer it...hmm, I wonder why?

“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

For starters I disagree with the premise of your question. I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then.

Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it. Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified.

Even Harry had to go back 20 years to find a Transportation Secretary that Harry thought was qualified and that was a black guy in the Clinton administration

"For starters I disagree with the premise of your question."
Hold on a minute, you disagree with the premise of my question so therefore you don't or can't answer it?

Yes. I don't know of anyone who was nominated by Biden based only on race.

"I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then."

I've made my position crystal clear...quotas or hiring on skin color, has no place in government or business.

Can you point to the quota that Biden is using? There are qualified candidates who are not white and male. There is nothing wrong with celebrating the hiring of those people if and when it is new until it isn't.

"Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it."

He has said openly that he will hire on skin color first....That's considered RACIST by anyone even half sane.

He said his cabinet would be diverse, that's not racism. He's found qualified people. You don't like them but nobody cares. You also don't seem to care when Trump didn't hire the best people, not a squeak from you.

"Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified."

This white male isn't qualified because you and or CNN said so?

No, because Whittaker literally was not qualified. In order to become an acting Attorney General w/out senate approval is if you are either Deputy AG, if you are already in the Dept. of Justice and have a job that required senate approval or if he were a recess appointee. The senate was not in recess. He literally did not meet the legal requirements. Plus his experience sucked .But did you care that he wasn't qualified? Nope.

But hey, he was white so I can see why you looked over it.

Here, give it one more try....
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

Again, disagree with the question but if you're asking if that is the definition of racism, no it's not. Buy a dictionary.

You're being being completely dishonest now.
Biden said his VP would be a black woman before he ever interviewed anybody....That's racist and discriminatory.

No, he said his VP candidate would be a woman. He picked a black woman. Technically multi-racial and I hope you love every moment of it.

I said: “Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”
You said: Again, disagree with the question but if you're asking if that is the definition of racism, no it's not. Buy a dictionary.

I do not believe purposefully picking a cabinet that is more diverse like the rest of the country is racist. Better?

Let me teach you something using an elementary method....
A business owner tells a potential employee that they need not apply for the advertised job opening since their skin isn't the color they are looking for to fill the current position.

Did Biden do that? No.

Are you sure the business owner isn't being racist?

Sounds like the business owner is racist. I'm not sure what that has to do with Biden picking Harris, it's not really the same thing especially since he never said the VP must be a black woman. Even then wanting to make the leadership of the country resemble the electorate is not racist. Especially since there are so many qualified people from different backgrounds.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

and yet you felt the need to make that comment about his dick, when all i did was ask, what are his qualifications for the job....you have a gay problem, otherwise you would have just talked about his qualifications....

That's what you got out of that post? I could also tell you not to be afraid of Harris' vagina since you seem to have a problem with her too. That's not anti-woman.

Get a grip.

yea thats what i got....why did you mention me sucking his dick?....and yea i have a problem with harris because i, unlike you and many others, have no idea what kind of a person she is.....i know better.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

yea he likes to change the question around when he gets called on something....wait until he tells you he doesnt remember the post you are talking about....

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

and yet you felt the need to make that comment about his dick, when all i did was ask, what are his qualifications for the job....you have a gay problem, otherwise you would have just talked about his qualifications....

That's what you got out of that post? I could also tell you not to be afraid of Harris' vagina since you seem to have a problem with her too. That's not anti-woman.

Get a grip.

yea thats what i got....why did you mention me sucking his dick?....and yea i have a problem with harris because i, unlike you and many others, have no idea what kind of a person she is.....i know better.....

Well, you got it wrong. Again my point was don't be afraid of Pete's sexuality...you know, don't be a homophobe the guy is qualified. You went into an entirely (and might I say obviously) lying tangent about what I said.

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

yea he likes to change the question around when he gets called on something....wait until he tells you he doesnt remember the post you are talking about....

No, I've been consistent, you've invented an entire mythology out of my posts.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

It's less racist to have a cabinet that resembles the people they are leading than an overwhelming number of white males. Democrats are multi-racial, much, much more so than Republicans so their pool of qualified candidates is gong to look a little different.

Come on now...you’ve been pushing hard for straight answers all the way through this thread....Give it to me straight.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

I've provided nothing but straight answers and multiple times to the same questions when my previous answer wasn't accepted.

Name someone not qualified, let's talk about them. We can start with this guy

View attachment 430715

It’s awfully bizarre that such a simple question has you so twisted and confused. My guess is you’re scared shitless to answer it...hmm, I wonder why?

“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

he was the same why in my conversation with this stroonge....

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

It's less racist to have a cabinet that resembles the people they are leading than an overwhelming number of white males. Democrats are multi-racial, much, much more so than Republicans so their pool of qualified candidates is gong to look a little different.

Come on now...you’ve been pushing hard for straight answers all the way through this thread....Give it to me straight.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

I've provided nothing but straight answers and multiple times to the same questions when my previous answer wasn't accepted.

Name someone not qualified, let's talk about them. We can start with this guy

View attachment 430715

It’s awfully bizarre that such a simple question has you so twisted and confused. My guess is you’re scared shitless to answer it...hmm, I wonder why?

“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

For starters I disagree with the premise of your question. I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then.

Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it. Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified.

Even Harry had to go back 20 years to find a Transportation Secretary that Harry thought was qualified and that was a black guy in the Clinton administration

thats because he had some experiance in transportation while the ones after him.....not so much...which answered the question you asked....

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

and yet you felt the need to make that comment about his dick, when all i did was ask, what are his qualifications for the job....you have a gay problem, otherwise you would have just talked about his qualifications....

That's what you got out of that post? I could also tell you not to be afraid of Harris' vagina since you seem to have a problem with her too. That's not anti-woman.

Get a grip.

yea thats what i got....why did you mention me sucking his dick?....and yea i have a problem with harris because i, unlike you and many others, have no idea what kind of a person she is.....i know better.....

Well, you got it wrong. Again my point was don't be afraid of Pete's sexuality...you know, don't be a homophobe the guy is qualified. You went into an entirely (and might I say obviously) lying tangent about what I said.

lol...yea sure i did you lying asshole....i asked a simple question, one that you were not able answer.....what is his qualifications for the job....and you told me dont be afraid because he is gay.....so who went on a tangent dipshit....you did thats who.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

yea he likes to change the question around when he gets called on something....wait until he tells you he doesnt remember the post you are talking about....

No, I've been consistent, you've invented an entire mythology out of my posts.

oh i did?....all you have done is damage control over what you said....i never said i had a problem with petes gayness,but yet YOU not me said i did....so who invented what here?...

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

It's less racist to have a cabinet that resembles the people they are leading than an overwhelming number of white males. Democrats are multi-racial, much, much more so than Republicans so their pool of qualified candidates is gong to look a little different.

Come on now...you’ve been pushing hard for straight answers all the way through this thread....Give it to me straight.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

I've provided nothing but straight answers and multiple times to the same questions when my previous answer wasn't accepted.

Name someone not qualified, let's talk about them. We can start with this guy

View attachment 430715

It’s awfully bizarre that such a simple question has you so twisted and confused. My guess is you’re scared shitless to answer it...hmm, I wonder why?

“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

For starters I disagree with the premise of your question. I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then.

Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it. Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified.

Even Harry had to go back 20 years to find a Transportation Secretary that Harry thought was qualified and that was a black guy in the Clinton administration

thats because he had some experiance in transportation while the ones after him.....not so much...which answered the question you asked....

So, when the gay guy gets a job that's when you have a problem with experience? Not before, just now.

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

yea he likes to change the question around when he gets called on something....wait until he tells you he doesnt remember the post you are talking about....

No, I've been consistent, you've invented an entire mythology out of my posts.

oh i did?....all you have done is damage control over what you said....i never said i had a problem with petes gayness,but yet YOU not me said i did....so who invented what here?...

You didn't seem to have a problem with the previous persons experience but with Pete you do. By the way, he is qualified.

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

and yet you felt the need to make that comment about his dick, when all i did was ask, what are his qualifications for the job....you have a gay problem, otherwise you would have just talked about his qualifications....

That's what you got out of that post? I could also tell you not to be afraid of Harris' vagina since you seem to have a problem with her too. That's not anti-woman.

Get a grip.

yea thats what i got....why did you mention me sucking his dick?....and yea i have a problem with harris because i, unlike you and many others, have no idea what kind of a person she is.....i know better.....

Well, you got it wrong. Again my point was don't be afraid of Pete's sexuality...you know, don't be a homophobe the guy is qualified. You went into an entirely (and might I say obviously) lying tangent about what I said.

lol...yea sure i did you lying asshole....i asked a simple question, one that you were not able answer.....what is his qualifications for the job....and you told me dont be afraid because he is gay.....so who went on a tangent dipshit....you did thats who.....

I haven't lied about anything. I told you his qualifications. I posted and later on I gave you the post number so that you could read it again. Derp. So, stop lying about my posts. You wanted his qualifications, I told you. You said I'm a homophobe because I told you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality (not my problem you didn't understand it) and you called me a racist merely bringing up the subject of race.

Not much else to respond to, I've given you way more time than you deserve.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

It's less racist to have a cabinet that resembles the people they are leading than an overwhelming number of white males. Democrats are multi-racial, much, much more so than Republicans so their pool of qualified candidates is gong to look a little different.

Come on now...you’ve been pushing hard for straight answers all the way through this thread....Give it to me straight.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

I've provided nothing but straight answers and multiple times to the same questions when my previous answer wasn't accepted.

Name someone not qualified, let's talk about them. We can start with this guy

View attachment 430715

It’s awfully bizarre that such a simple question has you so twisted and confused. My guess is you’re scared shitless to answer it...hmm, I wonder why?

“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

For starters I disagree with the premise of your question. I've told you why Democrats nominate people of color (because they are people of color) and then I asked you why when you brought up quotas that white males have consistently been over represented and you don't have a problem with quotas then.

Seems to me you just don't like the word 'diversity' and assume anyone hired on by the Biden administration isn't qualified because of it. Yet you can't provide a single name? I already posted a white male in the Trump administration who is considered not qualified.

Even Harry had to go back 20 years to find a Transportation Secretary that Harry thought was qualified and that was a black guy in the Clinton administration

thats because he had some experiance in transportation while the ones after him.....not so much...which answered the question you asked....

So, when the gay guy gets a job that's when you have a problem with experience? Not before, just now.

did i say that or was that you?....yep it was you....i have a problem with anyone taking a job that has no experience with what the job is about.....you just proved to me that him being gay is all that matters to you,never mind he has no experiance in transportation...

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?

I know you'd like to go back to the days when it was only white males who made up the vast majority of cabinet positions even though they do not equal even close to half the population.

That wasn’t my question though...stay focused please.
“Is it not racism if one person is chosen over another and the primary qualifier is skin color?”

yea he likes to change the question around when he gets called on something....wait until he tells you he doesnt remember the post you are talking about....

No, I've been consistent, you've invented an entire mythology out of my posts.

oh i did?....all you have done is damage control over what you said....i never said i had a problem with petes gayness,but yet YOU not me said i did....so who invented what here?...

You didn't seem to have a problem with the previous persons experience but with Pete you do. By the way, he is qualified.

i didnt?....how do you know?....show me a post of mine saying so....and how is he qualified?...because he was a mayor of a small city?...

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

the guy is getting a few things twisted up....he brought up race in our conversation and called me a white guy....but thats not being a racist....

Oh no, I brought up race in a thread about you asshats having a problem with Biden placing women and gays in his administration. Shoot me.

no you called me a white guy ....you did not need to....but you did.....and i have no problem with those people,it was about why was their gender or sexual persuasion the story instead of what they bring to the table....but you racist seem to be all alike dont you?....and yea people like you do need be shot...

Being the first or near first is a story. It's been explained to you. It's a normalization of diverse backgrounds and all people being able to create national policy. It's something to celebrate when the qualified people who work in government resemble we the people.

I'm sorry you have a problem with that.

nice dance....now why dont you tell me about your comment about me sucking petes dick and the need to call me a white guy?.....dont try to change what we were talking about.....

I said (paraphrasing) that just because Pete was nominated doesn't mean your life is going to change in any way you don't want it to. Pretty sure you purposefully missed the point.

the point you made was because he is gay, dont worry you wont have to suck his dick....pretty sure you are purposely trying to change your point....

Oh my god, this is funny shit.

My point was because a gay guy is in the Whitehouse doesn't mean you are going to turn gay against (or with) your will, unless you want to and again I'm not judging.

sure you did.....you racist/anti gay fuckers open your mouths and get called on it and then its damage control.....to late chump....

I'm the guy who thinks Pete is qualified and don't care if he is gay or not, remember? But if you want to ignore someone calling Pete a fag and go after my posts making fun of you having a problem with a gay guy in Biden's cabinet, then so be it. I think I hit a nerve though.

You're either lying about my posts or a moron if you think anything I've said is homophobic or racist.

you hit nothing because i dont have a problem with pete.....that wasnt my point was it?....and yea i came after you because you were wrong....you attacked me remember?...and your last sentence kinda proves i am the one who hit a nerve....how does it feel to get called out with your racist homophobic posts?...

It makes me laugh at you. Why not quote exactly what I said that was racist and I'll try to explain it to you in a way that you will understand.

we already did that and all you did was dance and change what was talked about....now i am laughing at you....

I think you gave me your incompetent interpretation of my posts. Why don't you quote the part you have problems with and I'll explain them to you.

are you going to play stupid now and pretend you dont know what posts we are talking about?...

You can't quote me where I said something racist or homophobic? If you're going to accuse me at least back it up.

its already been done asshole....quit playing stupid...

You never quoted it. Why can't you? Because you're lying about my posts? How am I supposed to respect your argument when you are lying about what I've said and have taken my posts out of context when you describe them to others? Be a man and back your claim or shove it.

we already did this in the beginning of this conversation.....dont play stupid....why dont you be a man and admit you know exactly what you said....and if you dont know what you said,how come in an above post you said you were paraphrasing what pete said?...quit being a dam pussy....

You didn't quote my posts directly, they don't say what you claim they do. You're either not very bright or you're lying. You're coming off like Bripat.

If I said something racist, quote it, it's that simple.

its funny how in the beginning of our chat you knew exactly what you said and made comments on it......now you have no idea?.....You're either not very bright or you're lying.....ill go with the lying because i dont think you are that stupid.....

Yes, I know what I said and it was neither homophobic or racist, that is your claim to back up so get to it. If all you have to do is quote me it should be pretty simple, liar.

why should i quote it if you are admitting you know what you said?.....either defend yourself or go find another minority to bad mouth....dam racist....

Because you made a claim that you are unable to back up. Post what you want me to defend. Are you really this lazy? Can't even prove what apparently must be pretty simple.

already did a of couple of times.....are you really this dishonest?....or you just cant disprove what i said....

I don't see you posting anything I've said that is racist or homophobic. You said I brought up race and somehow that was racist. I don't see how.

EDIT: If you'd like to refer to your post where you quoted me, just give me a post number and I'd be happy to comment again.

you have already proven you know exactly what post they were since you have already commented on them...give it up, you are making yourself look pretty dishonest....

I have not seen you post anything I've said that is what you claim. You said I brought up race so that is racist. What a stupid thing to say.

like i said dumbass, in the beginning of this thread you already commented on those posts, more than once, that you just cant seem to remember now....are trying come off now like you are kinda stupid?...

You made the claim that since I brought up race that I said something racist. ??? You have yet to explain that. I don't believe you quoted me, you just blurted it out.

EDIT: I'll do your work for you. Post 59 I said this:


Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

I don't see anything homophobic. Not a single word. I'm sorry telling you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality offends you but it's not homophobic, moron.

and yet you felt the need to make that comment about his dick, when all i did was ask, what are his qualifications for the job....you have a gay problem, otherwise you would have just talked about his qualifications....

That's what you got out of that post? I could also tell you not to be afraid of Harris' vagina since you seem to have a problem with her too. That's not anti-woman.

Get a grip.

yea thats what i got....why did you mention me sucking his dick?....and yea i have a problem with harris because i, unlike you and many others, have no idea what kind of a person she is.....i know better.....

Well, you got it wrong. Again my point was don't be afraid of Pete's sexuality...you know, don't be a homophobe the guy is qualified. You went into an entirely (and might I say obviously) lying tangent about what I said.

lol...yea sure i did you lying asshole....i asked a simple question, one that you were not able answer.....what is his qualifications for the job....and you told me dont be afraid because he is gay.....so who went on a tangent dipshit....you did thats who.....

I haven't lied about anything. I told you his qualifications. I posted and later on I gave you the post number so that you could read it again. Derp. So, stop lying about my posts. You wanted his qualifications, I told you. You said I'm a homophobe because I told you not to be afraid of Pete's sexuality (not my problem you didn't understand it) and you called me a racist merely bringing up the subject of race.

Not much else to respond to, I've given you way more time than you deserve.

you are the one that brought skin color and sucking dicks into this conversation when there was no need too, not me,you did.....that says a lot about you right there.....so yea run along and pretend you never said any of that shit...

 

[Concerned American]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

Trump before he ran was a "top tier" politician? Nope. I certainly wouldn't have considered Mike Pence to be top tier either.

Obama, Harris and Trump (if you're into that sort of thing) all have charisma and are either young (relatively speaking), considered outsiders or both.

You can't even make an argument that wouldn't apply to white politicians but yet explicitly claiming blacks and women are unqualified is noted.

What I stated was, "Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position". You're getting all twisted up in your posts.
Not surprising though.

Who exactly is "the best person for the position"? Does that really exist? Were all those old white guys always the most qualified? Why were they always white and how come you never questioned that?

Sometimes one of the best people for the position is those who have experiences that resemble all Americans and not just a few. A diverse administration is more representative of America and not just you and that is an improvement.

Trump worked for all Americans. Minorities did better under Trump. Obama attacked conservatives by using the irs.

So, COVID has affected minority communities to a greater extent than white ones. Trump chose to lie about the seriousness of the virus. We know this because we heard him say it.

Lol, a virus with a 99.8% survival rate. Anyway it's liberal cities that house them like rats, so of course they will be infected more. Trump got them more employment so hopefully they can get out of the liberal shitholes.

300k + dead and again that affects more POC than whites. Just curious, first off I disagree with your description of big cities but I assume you're speaking to living in close quarters. How do you expect large cities to house people?

The economy was on its own track before Trump got into office. Then the virus that he ignored hit and look where we are and POC feel it first. Just getting more people to wear a mask would have been so beneficial as we realized the disease was so contagious when airborne.

6% of that is death by covid only. It's a mild flu season, thanks for proving. You will do as you are told.

A person who is diabetic or has high blood pressure can function as a normal human being and live a long life, COVID can cut decades off of that.

There is comorbidity with Cancer
There is comorbidity with AIDS
There is comorbidity with diabetes
There is comorbidity with obesity
There is comorbidity with influenza
There is comorbidity with heart disease
There is comorbidity with COVID

Look at Bripat, he suffers from at least 3 of the above. If he gets COVID he's a goner.

The regular flu will do the same. Probably worse, please think for yourself for once.

It didn't.

It didn't what? Please explain.

Please explain how the flue is deadlier, start with 2020.

Well, if you leave it closed you can die of CO poisoning or smoke inhalation.