Why is First Woman, and First Homo such a political issue of Importance today?. Should it not be best qualified.?

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position. That's the difference

Trump has a history of hiring very unqualified people, you sure you want to sit on that?

 

[the other mike]

Victoria Claflin Woodhull, later Victoria Woodhull Martin (September 23, 1838 – June 9, 1927), was an American leader of the women's suffrage movement who ran for President of the United States in the 1872 election.

While many historians and authors agree that Woodhull was the first woman to run for the presidency, some disagree with classifying it as a true candidacy because she was younger than the constitutionally mandated age of 35

Victoria Woodhull - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[HappyJoy]

Kamala Harris is about to be the first woman to almost be vice president of the United States.

Let's hope I'm right.

You're not, it's pretty obvious and when we hit January 6th or January 20th you'll retreat to a new position. Get used to it.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

 

[Ridgerunner]

Classic example right here...

Whoopi Thinks Jill Biden, Not a Medical Doctor, Should Be Surgeon General

 

[easyt65]

I keep seeing news reports of first Woman, and or First Homosexual to be selected or appointed. Why is this so important in American politics today.Should it not be best qualified for these government positions? Your thoughts.

Biden is attempting to appease all the Social Justice and Political Correctness 'Warriors', attempting to show reps from all walks of life in the US support and are part of the 'unifying' Biden administration.

Any color, any life-style...whatever - 'Diversity' in EVERY aspect...EXCEPT ONE:

EVERYONE EXCEPT ANYONE WHO DOES NOT EMBRACE LIBERAL EXTREMIST IDEOLOGY AND POLICIES WELCOME.

 

[miketx]

It' a sign of equality and an American accomplishment. It's like being first in the family to graduate college.

Sorry, snowflakes (in every sense) but some accomplishments aren't about you.

Being the first sick perverted freak at a job is an accomplishment? No wonder you people are screwed in the head.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

Your identity politics trumps the best person for the position. That's the difference

Trump has a history of hiring very unqualified people, you sure you want to sit on that?

learn what trump means.....

 

[BlueGin]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

I did not say that the best person could not be Gay or a women, there are excellent women and Gay people who are the best at what they do. What I'am saying is that they seem to be just selecting people on a female or a Homosexual preference.

They need to virtue signal.

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

 

[Juicin]

It' a sign of equality and an American accomplishment. It's like being first in the family from graduate college.

Sorry, snowflakes (in every sense) but some accomplishments aren't about you.

its not much of an accomplishment if the person isnt qualified for the job....

*looks at amy barrett the housewife and sorority sister*

since when do republicans choose officials any better than democrats/ THey of course don't.

In fact they tend to be worse because republican elite are scum

 

[HappyJoy]

It' a sign of equality and an American accomplishment. It's like being first in the family to graduate college.

Sorry, snowflakes (in every sense) but some accomplishments aren't about you.

Being the first sick perverted freak at a job is an accomplishment? No wonder you people are screwed in the head.

Don't worry, Bripat isn't going to be nominated.

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

I did not say that the best person could not be Gay or a women, there are excellent women and Gay people who are the best at what they do. What I'am saying is that they seem to be just selecting people on a female or a Homosexual preference.

They need to virtue signal.

I don't see how making a presidential administration resemble the electorate is virtue signaling, it should actually be expected.

 

[Meister]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Yes, Kamala is a product of identity politics. Obama was a product of identity politics. Both are/were not top tier politicians.
Next in line for the presidency will be a tranny, it's their turn.

 

[Anathema]

I keep seeing news reports of first Woman, and or First Homosexual to be selected or appointed. Why is this so important in American politics today.Should it not be best qualified for these government positions? Your thoughts.

Some of us don’t believe women and homosexuals ARE qualified to hold such offices

 

[BlueGin]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

I did not say that the best person could not be Gay or a women, there are excellent women and Gay people who are the best at what they do. What I'am saying is that they seem to be just selecting people on a female or a Homosexual preference.

They need to virtue signal.

I don't see how making a presidential administration resemble the electorate is virtue signaling, it should actually be expected.

The electorate that the democrats gained was old white men. They lost ground with the other demographics. Their virtue signaling is purely for the elites on the coasts.

 

[miketx]

It' a sign of equality and an American accomplishment. It's like being first in the family to graduate college.

Sorry, snowflakes (in every sense) but some accomplishments aren't about you.

Being the first sick perverted freak at a job is an accomplishment? No wonder you people are screwed in the head.

Don't worry, Bripat isn't going to be nominated.

Deviant freak!

 

[citygator]

When people are excluded for 250 years then suddenly there is a representative that looks like America and not old white guys it’s news. News that America isn’t a white old man dump.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

i answered what you said....."The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay?".......the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....is there not a law saying you have to have x amount of minorities in management ....even though they may not be qualified?...would you hire someone who may not be very good at the job,just because he/she is a minority and you being being forced to do it,while lets say the non minority person is very qualified?.....if its a critical position who would you want to hire?....

 

[Turtlesoup]

It' a sign of equality and an American accomplishment. It's like being first in the family to graduate college.

Sorry, snowflakes (in every sense) but some accomplishments aren't about you.

No--its the opposite. To chose someone based on race, sex, sexual pervasion----is to be a bigot and prejudice--