Why is First Woman, and First Homo such a political issue of Importance today?. Should it not be best qualified.?

[BlindBoo]

Because Gays used to be prosecuted for being gay not to long ago and women were kept out of politics for a long time in America.

ok,but should one get a critical job just because they are a minority of some sort?...should they at least be qualified to do the job?...

"Just" because? No.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Because Gays used to be prosecuted for being gay not to long ago and women were kept out of politics for a long time in America.

ok,but should one get a critical job just because they are a minority of some sort?...should they at least be qualified to do the job?...

Nobody said otherwise.

it seems to be happening a lot though doesnt it....what qualifications does harris have to run this country?...she was a half-assed AG and a half- assed senator who did not get much support in the primaries....

 

[Juicin]

It' a sign of equality and an American accomplishment. It's like being first in the family from graduate college.

Sorry, snowflakes (in every sense) but some accomplishments aren't about you.

its not much of an accomplishment if the person isnt qualified for the job....

*looks at amy barrett the housewife and sorority sister*

since when do republicans choose officials any better than democrats/ THey of course don't.

In fact they tend to be worse because republican elite are scum

who said they do?.....let me check....oh that was you.....and in California democrat elite are pretty shitty too....and yes i lived there for 50 years....

It's implied with the whole thread

Republicans shocked that democrats are copying their strategy of cultural nods instead of actual policy they want

Republicans pioneered this shit

"you said it not OP" you fucking right. Idiot

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

As opposed to the slowly becoming defunct Republican Party.

*ahem*

 

[Billiejeens]

The first homo part is innaccurate

 

[BlueGin]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

I did not say that the best person could not be Gay or a women, there are excellent women and Gay people who are the best at what they do. What I'am saying is that they seem to be just selecting people on a female or a Homosexual preference.

They need to virtue signal.

I don't see how making a presidential administration resemble the electorate is virtue signaling, it should actually be expected.

The electorate that the democrats gained was old white men. They lost ground with the other demographics. Their virtue signaling is purely for the elites on the coasts.

Did you notice that the Democrats won knowing they're going to appoint more women and people of color? I'm not really sure what your point is and I don't think you do either.

They won by fraud. They lost ground with their main voting blocks. Biden has appointed rich CEO’s from Goldman Sach’s,Twitter etc to his administration. As always you are the party of the elite while pretending to be diverse ( via faux virtue signaling).

 

[Harry Dresden]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

i answered what you said....."The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay?".......the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....is there not a law saying you have to have x amount of minorities in management ....even though they may not be qualified?...would you hire someone who may not be very good at the job,just because he/she is a minority and you being being forced to do it,while lets say the non minority person is very qualified?.....if its a critical position who would you want to hire?....

Who was appointed only for being gay? You never said. Who isn't qualified?

if he wasnt appointed for being gay.....why is that the headline?..and i never pointed out anyone.....

Because it's a relatively new phenomenon and it is an accomplishment in that gays are now openly allowed to exit, live, breathe and form public policy just like everyone else.

Don't worry, nobody is forcing you to suck his dick, yet.

well that was pretty fucked thing to say about pete......and you are trying to be on the gays side in this thread?....

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It' a sign of equality and an American accomplishment. It's like being first in the family to graduate college.

Sorry, snowflakes (in every sense) but some accomplishments aren't about you.

No, it's about continued segregation by the left.

 

[Billiejeens]

thats all that should matter......but so many people today are ruled by political correctness that it is getting rather pathetic.....

But we are talking about Federal positions that have major impact on America and countries outside of America. Could this not affect Americas reputation around the world.?!

We had a kenyan Muslim in the half white house
Our rep was shot then

 

[HappyJoy]

Because Gays used to be prosecuted for being gay not to long ago and women were kept out of politics for a long time in America.

ok,but should one get a critical job just because they are a minority of some sort?...should they at least be qualified to do the job?...

Nobody said otherwise.

it seems to be happening a lot though doesnt it....what qualifications does harris have to run this country?...she was a half-assed AG and a half- assed senator who did not get much support in the primaries....

She ran the second largest justice system in the country. I don't think you're qualified to rate her one way or another and I don't care how white you are.

 

[Slade3200]

I keep seeing news reports of first Woman, and or First Homosexual to be selected or appointed. Why is this so important in American politics today.Should it not be best qualified for these government positions? Your thoughts.

Of course qualifications matter. There are plenty of women and homosexuals who are more than qualified but we’ve had very little of them representing us in leadership positions. That’s why it is significant.

 

[BlindBoo]

Because Gays used to be prosecuted for being gay not to long ago and women were kept out of politics for a long time in America.

ok,but should one get a critical job just because they are a minority of some sort?...should they at least be qualified to do the job?...

Nobody said otherwise.

it seems to be happening a lot though doesnt it....what qualifications does harris have to run this country?...she was a half-assed AG and a half- assed senator who did not get much support in the primaries....

Sounds like subjective opinion.

 

[miketx]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Affirmative action says so, liar.

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

I did not say that the best person could not be Gay or a women, there are excellent women and Gay people who are the best at what they do. What I'am saying is that they seem to be just selecting people on a female or a Homosexual preference.

They need to virtue signal.

I don't see how making a presidential administration resemble the electorate is virtue signaling, it should actually be expected.

The electorate that the democrats gained was old white men. They lost ground with the other demographics. Their virtue signaling is purely for the elites on the coasts.

Did you notice that the Democrats won knowing they're going to appoint more women and people of color? I'm not really sure what your point is and I don't think you do either.

They won by fraud. They lost ground with their main voting blocks. Biden has appointed rich CEO’s from Goldman Sach’s,Twitter etc to his administration. As always you are the party of the elite while pretending to be diverse ( via faux virtue signaling).

More black people voted for the Democrats than ever before and they overwhelmingly still voted for the Democrats. And as you stated older white Americans voted at a higher percentage for the Democrats.

The Democrats didn't cheat, if they did then the wingnut lawyers should have properly sued to overturn the election. They either didn't provide evidence of fraud or they provided really shitty evidence that was thrown out.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Ability, talent, experience and knowledge mean absolutely nothing. It is all about filling social credit slots. These are facts that will be used against us. We are lost as a nation.

 

[Harry Dresden]

It' a sign of equality and an American accomplishment. It's like being first in the family from graduate college.

Sorry, snowflakes (in every sense) but some accomplishments aren't about you.

its not much of an accomplishment if the person isnt qualified for the job....

*looks at amy barrett the housewife and sorority sister*

since when do republicans choose officials any better than democrats/ THey of course don't.

In fact they tend to be worse because republican elite are scum

who said they do?.....let me check....oh that was you.....and in California democrat elite are pretty shitty too....and yes i lived there for 50 years....

It's implied with the whole thread

Republicans shocked that democrats are copying their strategy of cultural nods instead of actual policy they want

Republicans pioneered this shit

"you said it not OP" you fucking right. Idiot

i did where?...and of course here comes the name calling by the tolerant liberal....

 

[HappyJoy]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Affirmative action says so, liar.

No. Affirmative action does not require anyone to hire someone who is not qualified. Especially political appointees which appears to be the topic, doink.

 

[miketx]

I keep seeing news reports of first Woman, and or First Homosexual to be selected or appointed. Why is this so important in American politics today.Should it not be best qualified for these government positions? Your thoughts.

Of course qualifications matter. There are plenty of women and homosexuals who are more than qualified but we’ve had very little of them representing us in leadership positions. That’s why it is significant.

I wonder if the aliens watching us are all faggots and they are waiting until we are all fags to come down and anal probe us all?

 

[miketx]

The democrat party is a party of identity politics. The want to have the look of being all inclusive.
So, you don't get the best person for the position.

The best person for the job can't be a woman or gay? Weird. In reality there are hundreds of people who are qualified for any given position. Was Ben Carson best for HUD? Probably not, but you didn't complain about that. How about Mark Meadows for CoS? He kind of sucked.

no one said that did they?....the point is appointing someone to a job BECAUSE that person is gay or whatever even thought there might be better people who just might not be gay or whatever.....

Who said the only reason a person of color or woman is appointed is because of race or gender. There are numerous qualified people who are not white that are capable and Biden is picking some of them to fill his cabinet.

In the meantime Trump picked Ben Carson for HUD. Was he qualified? Not really and in hearings he obviously doesn't seem to care or know what he's talking about. Did Trump pick Carson for HUD because he's black? Maybe. Do you care? Nope.

How about Mark Meadows? White guy, total train wreck.

Every person regardless of their own genetic make up should be qualified, period. But to almost always and consistently go white male is excluding a lot of qualified people.

Affirmative action says so, liar.

No. Affirmative action does not require anyone to hire someone who is not qualified. Especially political appointees which appears to be the topic, doink.

You're either an idiot or a liar. I favor idiot but unfortunately liar it is.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Because Gays used to be prosecuted for being gay not to long ago and women were kept out of politics for a long time in America.

ok,but should one get a critical job just because they are a minority of some sort?...should they at least be qualified to do the job?...

Nobody said otherwise.

it seems to be happening a lot though doesnt it....what qualifications does harris have to run this country?...she was a half-assed AG and a half- assed senator who did not get much support in the primaries....

She ran the second largest justice system in the country. I don't think you're qualified to rate her one way or another and I don't care how white you are.

i lived there when she was the AG there .....how long did you live there?.....and i am not considered white,i pass for a Mexican very easily...so stick your racist shit up your ass...