daws101
Diamond Member
- Jul 7, 2011
- 41,526
- 3,122
excuse me? that should read: I (YWC) however take a story about the past and act like it is a fact because I simply do not understand fact from possibility."Be specific.
"origins of life ? Don't bring me something that is nothing more than conjecture."
You seem to be taking the position that, unless we can provide a convincing alternative, we must accept your supernatural explanation for the origins of life. We don't.
More importantly, we don't have to accept it as science, because it's not. You might not find evolution theory convincing, and that's fine, but it is science. Supernatural explanations are not.
Fair enough But you see I have stated I can't show evidence that proves Gods existence.I can only provide evidence that infers a designer. Daws however takes a story about the past and acts like it is a fact because he simply does not understand fact from possibility. You can choose to believe that if you wish it's fine but don't act like it refutes anything like he or she does.
I would argue that is not science.
ALSO, THE ONLY INFERENCE ywc can make is he believes there is a designer as there is no evidence to bolster that claim.
Last edited: