Why is the far left so upset that a 17 year old Patriot shoot arsonists and looters?

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
 
Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.

It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.
We need more violent commies getting gunned down by other citizens. We need this to happen 100 times a day until all commies are fucking dead.
Commies ? You mean socialist, fascist .....and other Trump Humpers.

You‘re a constitutional idiot. None if your rights are absolute and all are subject to regulation. Especially your right to a militia. “Shall not be infringed” ONLY applies to qualified people. 17 year olds are not qualified in states to take up arms and join the militia.

The sure as hell can fuck up savages that are dumb enough to think they have power in numbers.
 
Now. A question back at you. Why was Rittenhouse there?
Exactly. He was there to carry the torch of fear. Most shootings are done out of fear. Anyone who parades around with an AR15 style weapon or any semi auto long rifle. Is making a statement. They aren’t defensive weapons in crowds for untrained, unqualified and uncertified persons. He got the attention he was after.
Its not going to be easy explaining away his motivation before the shooting started. The right can whine all they want about shooting in self defense. It’s not going to cut it. I’m sure he thought the intimidation factor worked for him. The opposite is truth. People have a right to be out in public not to feel intimidated by unqualified people who are just a hair trigger away from being a nut case.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
his body dumbass,,,,
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
Again, please look up the Wisconsin Statute for yourself and save yourself from embarrassment.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
his body dumbass,,,,
lol.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
his body dumbass,,,,
An example for you Red Doper Diaper Baby played out in the Cheese State.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
Again, please look up the Wisconsin Statute for yourself and save yourself from embarrassment.
you have no idea what a castle is, eh?
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
his body dumbass,,,,
An example for you Red Doper Diaper Baby played out in the Cheese State.
How gosh darn hard is it to investigate something then provide feedback?
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
his body dumbass,,,,
An example for you Red Doper Diaper Baby played out in the Cheese State.
HUH???
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
Again, please look up the Wisconsin Statute for yourself and save yourself from embarrassment.
It doesn’t matter what the Wisconsin statute says. It’s a federal crime to transport ANY firearm across state lines to be used for unlawful purposes. If he is found guilty of misusing a firearm of violating a gun Reg after transporting it this way, it is a federal crime in addition . That he is not 18 already means he’s violated Wisconsin open carry law. He’s fked before he started shooting.
 
Last edited:
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
Again, please look up the Wisconsin Statute for yourself and save yourself from embarrassment.
you have no idea what a castle is, eh?
Essentially it means this....You, your body, your car, your property, your livelihood. Pretty clear cut chief. It may vary state by state.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
his body dumbass,,,,
An example for you Red Doper Diaper Baby played out in the Cheese State.
How gosh darn hard is it to investigate something then provide feedback?
i already did that. it's your turn as you obviously do not understand what a castle is and why it does not apply here. your co-moron is ahead of you and tried to define his body as a castle. fail.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
Again, please look up the Wisconsin Statute for yourself and save yourself from embarrassment.
It doesn’t matter what the Wisconsin statute says. It’s a federal crime to transport ANY firearm across state lines to be used for unlawful purposes. If he is found guilty if misusing a firearm after transporting it this way, it is a federal crime.



You‘ve been fact-checked.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
his body dumbass,,,,
An example for you Red Doper Diaper Baby played out in the Cheese State.
How gosh darn hard is it to investigate something then provide feedback?
i already did that. it's your turn as you obviously do not understand what a castle is and why it does not apply here. your co-moron is ahead of you and tried to define his body as a castle. fail.
What did it say?
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
Again, please look up the Wisconsin Statute for yourself and save yourself from embarrassment.
you have no idea what a castle is, eh?
Essentially it means this....You, your body, your car, your property, your livelihood. Pretty clear cut chief. It may vary state by state.
wrong. holy fuck. why do you think they gave the name castle doctrine to some very specific expansions to self-defense applicability?
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
Again, please look up the Wisconsin Statute for yourself and save yourself from embarrassment.
you have no idea what a castle is, eh?
Essentially it means this....You, your body, your car, your property, your livelihood. Pretty clear cut chief. It may vary state by state.
wrong. holy fuck. why do you think they gave the name castle doctrine to some very specific expansions to self-defense applicability?
Yes. In Missouri a few years back a guy killed a man sitting in his car stealing from it as he was leaving for work. Castle Doctrine. He is still a free man.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
his body dumbass,,,,
some people are just too stupid for words.

Yes, by a'll meanns, he should just allow himself to be killed. He was just getting in the way of all that looting and arson, anyway.
 
So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.
That’s wrong. Citizens do not have a right to do law enforcement by shooting people when their lives are not endanger you fool. Suspected theft Is not a valid reason to execute people. You’re imbecilic remarks are rediculous.

the second amendment gives people the right to SELF. Defense and the defense of life, not to execute people otherwise you fool......that’s why we arrest people first and give them due process.

Wisconsin has a statute called Castle Doctrine. Please inform yourself of their laws, etc., before you embarrass yourself further.

Your rationale would be eaten up in a court of law.
what was rittenhouse's castle, perfessor?
Again, please look up the Wisconsin Statute for yourself and save yourself from embarrassment.
you have no idea what a castle is, eh?
Essentially it means this....You, your body, your car, your property, your livelihood. Pretty clear cut chief. It may vary state by state.
wrong. holy fuck. why do you think they gave the name castle doctrine to some very specific expansions to self-defense applicability?

Self-Defense and the Castle Doctrine
Wisconsin
law allows deadly force in self-defense in the limited circumstances where the person defending themselves “reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm” to their person.Oct 30, 2014

Wisconsin Court Clarifies New Self-Defense Rule
 

Forum List

Back
Top