Why Is The GOP Senate So Afraid To Call Witnesses??

[Faun]

Again, the unemployment rate was higher than the ARRA predicted (December, 2008), than when ARRA was passed (February, 2009). And they predicted it would drop to 6% in 2012 and that happened in 2014.

That's five years later, Faun! ARRA didn't make the unemployment rate drop to 6% five years after it was passed! Those unemployment numbers were driven by things like the energy boom...things that Barry not only didn't DO but actively opposed!

Lying con tool, you were the one to point out ARRA predicted a return to 6% unemployment. I was the one to point out it predicted that would happen in 2012 and that unemployment due to Bush's Great Recession turned out to be greater than the ARRA expected, resulting in it taking 2 extra years to get back down to 6%.

Once again...you clueless partisan hack! )) Obama and Pelosi assured us that the unemployment rate would rise above 8% if the ARRA wasn't approved but if it WAS then the unemployment rate would go down to 6% and do so quickly because of all the "shovel ready" jobs they were going to create!

So they got their money...did their stimulus package...and what happened? The unemployment rate went to over 10% and the whole "shovel ready" job thing never happened! That's what you progressives do to an economy when you're running things.

Again, lying con tool... the unemployment rate was already about 8% when the ARRA was passed.

That earlier prediction was already out the window.

That earlier prediction was so clueless that it WAS already out the window when the ARRA was passed...just like the claims about "shovel ready" jobs was out the window by the end of the summer! Face it, Faun...you progressives just plain SUCK at creating jobs! It's just not your thing. You're good at buying votes. You need to give things to people to get them to support you.

LOLOL

Obama added 16 million jobs in his last 7 years.

Bush43 added 1 million jobs in 8 years.

Clinton added 23 million jobs in 8 years.

Bush41 added 3 million jobs in 4 years.

Reagan added 16 million jobs in 8 years.

Carter added 10 million jobs in 4 years.

Even deducting the 4 million jobs lost during Obama's first year after inheriting Bush's Great Recession, we still find over the last 6 presidents spanning 20 years of Democrats and 20 years of Republicans, we end up with...

Democrat ..... 45 million jobs
Republican ... 20 million jobs

Do you ever stop lying, ya lying con tool?

Ever???

 

[Street Juice]

it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

Probably for the same reason a wealthy person in 1920 Russia didn't want to testify in a Bolshevik proceeding.

 

[Erinwltr]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

Jesus, jitler. You really are Fucking Stupid.

 

[MeBelle]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

why-is-the-gop-senate-so-afraid-to-call-witnesses.


What a FAIL!

The HOUSE wouldn't 'allow' GOP witnesses to 'testify' in their close door interrogations.

The HOUSE is AFRAID, should they finally turn over impeachment papers to the Senate, of ANY and ALL witnesses called to testify.

 

[MeBelle]

Jesus, jitler. You really are Fucking Stupid.

Ahhhh.....

An intelligent response from the USMB community.

 

[Oldstyle]

That's five years later, Faun! ARRA didn't make the unemployment rate drop to 6% five years after it was passed! Those unemployment numbers were driven by things like the energy boom...things that Barry not only didn't DO but actively opposed!

Lying con tool, you were the one to point out ARRA predicted a return to 6% unemployment. I was the one to point out it predicted that would happen in 2012 and that unemployment due to Bush's Great Recession turned out to be greater than the ARRA expected, resulting in it taking 2 extra years to get back down to 6%.

Once again...you clueless partisan hack! )) Obama and Pelosi assured us that the unemployment rate would rise above 8% if the ARRA wasn't approved but if it WAS then the unemployment rate would go down to 6% and do so quickly because of all the "shovel ready" jobs they were going to create!

So they got their money...did their stimulus package...and what happened? The unemployment rate went to over 10% and the whole "shovel ready" job thing never happened! That's what you progressives do to an economy when you're running things.

Again, lying con tool... the unemployment rate was already about 8% when the ARRA was passed.

That earlier prediction was already out the window.

That earlier prediction was so clueless that it WAS already out the window when the ARRA was passed...just like the claims about "shovel ready" jobs was out the window by the end of the summer! Face it, Faun...you progressives just plain SUCK at creating jobs! It's just not your thing. You're good at buying votes. You need to give things to people to get them to support you.

LOLOL

Obama added 16 million jobs in his last 7 years.

Bush43 added 1 million jobs in 8 years.

Clinton added 23 million jobs in 8 years.

Bush41 added 3 million jobs in 4 years.

Reagan added 16 million jobs in 8 years.

Carter added 10 million jobs in 4 years.

Even deducting the 4 million jobs lost during Obama's first year after inheriting Bush's Great Recession, we still find over the last 6 presidents spanning 20 years of Democrats and 20 years of Republicans, we end up with...

Democrat ..... 45 million jobs
Republican ... 20 million jobs

Do you ever stop lying, ya lying con tool?

Ever???

Obama added those jobs? How exactly did he do that? What economic policy of HIS was it that made that happen? As I've said repeatedly...the American economy slowly recovered DESPITE Barack Obama's totally clueless economic policies! He wasn't responsible for the oil and natural gas boom that drove job creation...he opposed the use of fracking that created that boom!
As usual...you use statistics to hide the truth.

 

[Jitss617]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

Jesus, jitler. You really are Fucking Stupid.

Look at that substance you come with more substance than a peanut butter and jelly sandwich you go girl lol

 

[Faun]

Lying con tool, you were the one to point out ARRA predicted a return to 6% unemployment. I was the one to point out it predicted that would happen in 2012 and that unemployment due to Bush's Great Recession turned out to be greater than the ARRA expected, resulting in it taking 2 extra years to get back down to 6%.

Once again...you clueless partisan hack! )) Obama and Pelosi assured us that the unemployment rate would rise above 8% if the ARRA wasn't approved but if it WAS then the unemployment rate would go down to 6% and do so quickly because of all the "shovel ready" jobs they were going to create!

So they got their money...did their stimulus package...and what happened? The unemployment rate went to over 10% and the whole "shovel ready" job thing never happened! That's what you progressives do to an economy when you're running things.

Again, lying con tool... the unemployment rate was already about 8% when the ARRA was passed.

That earlier prediction was already out the window.

That earlier prediction was so clueless that it WAS already out the window when the ARRA was passed...just like the claims about "shovel ready" jobs was out the window by the end of the summer! Face it, Faun...you progressives just plain SUCK at creating jobs! It's just not your thing. You're good at buying votes. You need to give things to people to get them to support you.

LOLOL

Obama added 16 million jobs in his last 7 years.

Bush43 added 1 million jobs in 8 years.

Clinton added 23 million jobs in 8 years.

Bush41 added 3 million jobs in 4 years.

Reagan added 16 million jobs in 8 years.

Carter added 10 million jobs in 4 years.

Even deducting the 4 million jobs lost during Obama's first year after inheriting Bush's Great Recession, we still find over the last 6 presidents spanning 20 years of Democrats and 20 years of Republicans, we end up with...

Democrat ..... 45 million jobs
Republican ... 20 million jobs

Do you ever stop lying, ya lying con tool?

Ever???

Obama added those jobs? How exactly did he do that? What economic policy of HIS was it that made that happen? As I've said repeatedly...the American economy slowly recovered DESPITE Barack Obama's totally clueless economic policies! He wasn't responsible for the oil and natural gas boom that drove job creation...he opposed the use of fracking that created that boom!
As usual...you use statistics to hide the truth.

Asked and answered, lying con tool. Meanwhile, despite your lies, Democrats have added roughly twice as many jobs over the last 6 presidencies.

Democrat ..... 45 million jobs
Republican ... 20 million jobs

 

[Jitss617]

Once again...you clueless partisan hack! )) Obama and Pelosi assured us that the unemployment rate would rise above 8% if the ARRA wasn't approved but if it WAS then the unemployment rate would go down to 6% and do so quickly because of all the "shovel ready" jobs they were going to create!

So they got their money...did their stimulus package...and what happened? The unemployment rate went to over 10% and the whole "shovel ready" job thing never happened! That's what you progressives do to an economy when you're running things.

Again, lying con tool... the unemployment rate was already about 8% when the ARRA was passed.

That earlier prediction was already out the window.

That earlier prediction was so clueless that it WAS already out the window when the ARRA was passed...just like the claims about "shovel ready" jobs was out the window by the end of the summer! Face it, Faun...you progressives just plain SUCK at creating jobs! It's just not your thing. You're good at buying votes. You need to give things to people to get them to support you.

LOLOL

Obama added 16 million jobs in his last 7 years.

Bush43 added 1 million jobs in 8 years.

Clinton added 23 million jobs in 8 years.

Bush41 added 3 million jobs in 4 years.

Reagan added 16 million jobs in 8 years.

Carter added 10 million jobs in 4 years.

Even deducting the 4 million jobs lost during Obama's first year after inheriting Bush's Great Recession, we still find over the last 6 presidents spanning 20 years of Democrats and 20 years of Republicans, we end up with...

Democrat ..... 45 million jobs
Republican ... 20 million jobs

Do you ever stop lying, ya lying con tool?

Ever???

Obama added those jobs? How exactly did he do that? What economic policy of HIS was it that made that happen? As I've said repeatedly...the American economy slowly recovered DESPITE Barack Obama's totally clueless economic policies! He wasn't responsible for the oil and natural gas boom that drove job creation...he opposed the use of fracking that created that boom!
As usual...you use statistics to hide the truth.

Asked and answered, lying con tool. Meanwhile, despite your lies, Democrats have added roughly twice as many jobs over the last 6 presidencies.

Poor guy lol

 

[Oldstyle]

Once again...you clueless partisan hack! )) Obama and Pelosi assured us that the unemployment rate would rise above 8% if the ARRA wasn't approved but if it WAS then the unemployment rate would go down to 6% and do so quickly because of all the "shovel ready" jobs they were going to create!

So they got their money...did their stimulus package...and what happened? The unemployment rate went to over 10% and the whole "shovel ready" job thing never happened! That's what you progressives do to an economy when you're running things.

Again, lying con tool... the unemployment rate was already about 8% when the ARRA was passed.

That earlier prediction was already out the window.

That earlier prediction was so clueless that it WAS already out the window when the ARRA was passed...just like the claims about "shovel ready" jobs was out the window by the end of the summer! Face it, Faun...you progressives just plain SUCK at creating jobs! It's just not your thing. You're good at buying votes. You need to give things to people to get them to support you.

LOLOL

Obama added 16 million jobs in his last 7 years.

Bush43 added 1 million jobs in 8 years.

Clinton added 23 million jobs in 8 years.

Bush41 added 3 million jobs in 4 years.

Reagan added 16 million jobs in 8 years.

Carter added 10 million jobs in 4 years.

Even deducting the 4 million jobs lost during Obama's first year after inheriting Bush's Great Recession, we still find over the last 6 presidents spanning 20 years of Democrats and 20 years of Republicans, we end up with...

Democrat ..... 45 million jobs
Republican ... 20 million jobs

Do you ever stop lying, ya lying con tool?

Ever???

Obama added those jobs? How exactly did he do that? What economic policy of HIS was it that made that happen? As I've said repeatedly...the American economy slowly recovered DESPITE Barack Obama's totally clueless economic policies! He wasn't responsible for the oil and natural gas boom that drove job creation...he opposed the use of fracking that created that boom!
As usual...you use statistics to hide the truth.

Asked and answered, lying con tool. Meanwhile, despite your lies, Democrats have added roughly twice as many jobs over the last 6 presidencies.

Democrat ..... 45 million jobs
Republican ... 20 million jobs

You give Obama credit for something he had nothing to do with...but accuse me of being untruthful? You're one of the board's biggest bullshit artists, Faun. You use statistics to obscure the truth and then whine about "liars" when you get called on it!

 

[airplanemechanic]

Once again...you clueless partisan hack! )) Obama and Pelosi assured us that the unemployment rate would rise above 8% if the ARRA wasn't approved but if it WAS then the unemployment rate would go down to 6% and do so quickly because of all the "shovel ready" jobs they were going to create!

So they got their money...did their stimulus package...and what happened? The unemployment rate went to over 10% and the whole "shovel ready" job thing never happened! That's what you progressives do to an economy when you're running things.

Again, lying con tool... the unemployment rate was already about 8% when the ARRA was passed.

That earlier prediction was already out the window.

That earlier prediction was so clueless that it WAS already out the window when the ARRA was passed...just like the claims about "shovel ready" jobs was out the window by the end of the summer! Face it, Faun...you progressives just plain SUCK at creating jobs! It's just not your thing. You're good at buying votes. You need to give things to people to get them to support you.

LOLOL

Obama added 16 million jobs in his last 7 years.

Bush43 added 1 million jobs in 8 years.

Clinton added 23 million jobs in 8 years.

Bush41 added 3 million jobs in 4 years.

Reagan added 16 million jobs in 8 years.

Carter added 10 million jobs in 4 years.

Even deducting the 4 million jobs lost during Obama's first year after inheriting Bush's Great Recession, we still find over the last 6 presidents spanning 20 years of Democrats and 20 years of Republicans, we end up with...

Democrat ..... 45 million jobs
Republican ... 20 million jobs

Do you ever stop lying, ya lying con tool?

Ever???

Obama added those jobs? How exactly did he do that? What economic policy of HIS was it that made that happen? As I've said repeatedly...the American economy slowly recovered DESPITE Barack Obama's totally clueless economic policies! He wasn't responsible for the oil and natural gas boom that drove job creation...he opposed the use of fracking that created that boom!
As usual...you use statistics to hide the truth.

Asked and answered, lying con tool. Meanwhile, despite your lies, Democrats have added roughly twice as many jobs over the last 6 presidencies.

Democrat ..... 45 million jobs
Republican ... 20 million jobs

Let's take a look at real numbers that take the size of the entire economy into consideration when talking job numbers:

Which President Created the Most Jobs?

Oh wait.....Obama isn't near the top. In fact, Obama is under JIMMY CARTER!! LOLOL Clinton is top of the list, but he handed Bush the dot-com bubble. Clinton wasn't responsible for the jobs, the growth in tech that just so happened under his administration was what grew the jobs but that busted in his face in 2000.

Roosevelt was actually the biggest increase in jobs under a president. But that was before the parties switched. He would NOT be considered anything CLOSE to a democrat today.

Reagan is number 3, a republican by todays standards.

 

[OldLady]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

So, in a murder trial;, you would call no witnesses that show your client is innocent?

So far most witnesses have agreed that Trump quid pro quo.

If the Republicans call no one, their vote is 100% political & pisses on the duty as set forth by the US Constitution.

What crime has been committed?
Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
If they wanted witnesses they should have used the courts, but, they were in a hurry to a train wreck....and it did wreck for them.
Perhaps, in their next impeachment hoax with this president they will slow down.

Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
Trump is stopping those who heard straight from the horses mouth from testifying. It is as simple as that and it doesn't take a genius to understand why he is doing it.

 

[Jitss617]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

So, in a murder trial;, you would call no witnesses that show your client is innocent?

So far most witnesses have agreed that Trump quid pro quo.

If the Republicans call no one, their vote is 100% political & pisses on the duty as set forth by the US Constitution.

What crime has been committed?
Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
If they wanted witnesses they should have used the courts, but, they were in a hurry to a train wreck....and it did wreck for them.
Perhaps, in their next impeachment hoax with this president they will slow down.

Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
Trump is stopping those who heard straight from the horses mouth from testifying. It is as simple as that and it doesn't take a genius to understand why he is doing it.

If you ha e no evidence time to put the baby to sleep. What trump says to his cabinet is none of your business. It’s called executive privilege elections have consequences if you don’t like it try to win try to get America to like your candidate Democrats we don’t like you you’re gonna be voted out again

 

[Meister]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

So, in a murder trial;, you would call no witnesses that show your client is innocent?

So far most witnesses have agreed that Trump quid pro quo.

If the Republicans call no one, their vote is 100% political & pisses on the duty as set forth by the US Constitution.

What crime has been committed?
Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
If they wanted witnesses they should have used the courts, but, they were in a hurry to a train wreck....and it did wreck for them.
Perhaps, in their next impeachment hoax with this president they will slow down.

Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
Trump is stopping those who heard straight from the horses mouth from testifying. It is as simple as that and it doesn't take a genius to understand why he is doing it.

Then your tribe should have used the courts to have those witnesses testify instead of racing through the impeachment process.
That's what the courts are there for. sheesh

 

[NoNukes]

The House needs to present a complete and valid case. They are the prosecutors. The Senate is the jury. A jury does not investigate.

A jury does listen to witnesses.

 

[yidnar]

the dems didnt allow republicans to call forth witnesses during their inquiry ....

 

[OldLady]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

So, in a murder trial;, you would call no witnesses that show your client is innocent?

So far most witnesses have agreed that Trump quid pro quo.

If the Republicans call no one, their vote is 100% political & pisses on the duty as set forth by the US Constitution.

What crime has been committed?
Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
If they wanted witnesses they should have used the courts, but, they were in a hurry to a train wreck....and it did wreck for them.
Perhaps, in their next impeachment hoax with this president they will slow down.

Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
Trump is stopping those who heard straight from the horses mouth from testifying. It is as simple as that and it doesn't take a genius to understand why he is doing it.

Then your tribe should have used the courts to have those witnesses testify instead of racing through the impeachment process.
That's what the courts are there for. sheesh

Perhaps the better thing, the more decent thing, would have been for the President to cooperate with the subpoenas from the Congress, as the Constitution sets forth.
If you are so sure the courts would force the President's men to testify, why are we going through this charade? He is obviously wrong and he knows it.

 

[Jitss617]

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

So, in a murder trial;, you would call no witnesses that show your client is innocent?

So far most witnesses have agreed that Trump quid pro quo.

If the Republicans call no one, their vote is 100% political & pisses on the duty as set forth by the US Constitution.

What crime has been committed?
Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
If they wanted witnesses they should have used the courts, but, they were in a hurry to a train wreck....and it did wreck for them.
Perhaps, in their next impeachment hoax with this president they will slow down.

Witnesses who say, I presumed", "I assumed" , I heard ______ say"......that is not evidence in a court of law.
Trump is stopping those who heard straight from the horses mouth from testifying. It is as simple as that and it doesn't take a genius to understand why he is doing it.

Then your tribe should have used the courts to have those witnesses testify instead of racing through the impeachment process.
That's what the courts are there for. sheesh

Perhaps the better thing, the more decent thing, would have been for the President to cooperate with the subpoenas from the Congress, as the Constitution sets forth.
If you are so sure the courts would force the President's men to testify, why are we going through this charade? He is obviously wrong and he knows it.

Elections have consequences

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The House needs to present a complete and valid case. They are the prosecutors. The Senate is the jury. A jury does not investigate.

A jury does listen to witnesses.

That is the job of the House. They must present a completed investigation. The Senate has no obligation to continue the investigation.

As things stand now, if Pelosi doesn't present the case to the Senate following the recess, the Senate may well declare it null and void.

In any case, the House Democrats may well have brought their own party down with this ridiculous charade.

 

[NoNukes]

The republican solution to all things Trump....

Pretend it never happened or attack some chick's dead husband and blame it on Greta

Well said.