EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,153
- 1,100
Why wait till they have killed millions of us before we respond meaningfully? The piecemeal approach of the liberal Obama years has resulted in Paris.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.
You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.
You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear."Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.
You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.
dear, why troops when we can just eliminate Raqqa with missiles?? Also , several like Trump have said they will deploy troops.
They will not stop. Accept them at your peril. Or exterminate them...as we would have done before the rise of Libtards faggots.
You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.
You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear."Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.
You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.
dear, why troops when we can just eliminate Raqqa with missiles?? Also , several like Trump have said they will deploy troops.
So do you support sending in the minimum of 30,000 troops it will take or not?
So do you support sending in the minimum of 30,000 troops it will take or not?
Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.
dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.
So do you support sending in at least 30,000 troops to finish them off?You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear."Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.
You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.
dear, why troops when we can just eliminate Raqqa with missiles?? Also , several like Trump have said they will deploy troops.
So do you support sending in the minimum of 30,000 troops it will take or not?
You can also not defeat ISIS by sitting around with your thumb stuck up your ass like Obama has been doing. He's clearly just trying to run out the clock on his presidency doing as little as possible about the problem he has mismanaged.
Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.
dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.
So WTF do you mean by "reacting proactively" if what we have been doing is not enough but you don't want to defeat them?
Do you even have a clue what you are trying to say?
So do you support sending in at least 30,000 troops to finish them off?
They're making a million per day in oil sales.Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.
dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.
So WTF do you mean by "reacting proactively" if what we have been doing is not enough but you don't want to defeat them?
Do you even have a clue what you are trying to say?
Notice how the cowards STILL won't commit to any plan other than that old standby, "Whatever Obama is doing, we are against that"?
You can't "eliminate Raqqa with missiles". It would either have to be nuked or bombed like Dresden in WWII.Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.
dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.
So WTF do you mean by "reacting proactively" if what we have been doing is not enough but you don't want to defeat them?
Do you even have a clue what you are trying to say?
dear the example I gave of a proactive response was to eliminate Raqqa.
Do you understand???