Why so much anger on USMB

[Yurt]

1. No they don't.
2. Tried once, nothing done. (Remember, stormfront affiliated website)

you're being unfair in judging this board and CK, you need to speak up

again [MENTION=36528]cereal_killer[/MENTION]

I'm not being unfair at all. The thread is about why there is so much anger on this forum...I am explaining why. The board caters to, encourages and supports angry people. Period.

bullshit. period.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Can't blame Strom Thurmond. Some girls giving birth to a baby never knew who the father is.

Maybe that is the reason they all call each other brother and sister.

And that's why you folks are dying out; the millenials have nothing to do with you.

My children are a bit older than to be called millennials, but since they were not raised by the most wasteful and useless generation, you know, baby boomers, they will have respect for their elders and would look out for us, even though we have been conservatives all our lives (well maybe not between the age of 9 and 14) and could manage on our own. You should be so lucky.

As have we: four children, four marriages, four graduate degrees, fifteen grandchildren, no divorces, no bankrupticies, no drugs, no addictions. And the grandchildren will have nothing to with the far right. Nor will their friends nor their friends friends.

 

[JakeStarkey]

you're being unfair in judging this board and CK, you need to speak up

again [MENTION=36528]cereal_killer[/MENTION]

I'm not being unfair at all. The thread is about why there is so much anger on this forum...I am explaining why. The board caters to, encourages and supports angry people. Period.

bullshit. period.

Proof positive.

 

[JakeStarkey]

this is not a stormfront site.

paleeze

You would fit right in at stormfront, in my opinion.

then you can surely cite one post of mine that is racist.....right?

all you do is lie jake. i don't understand why. really, why lie so much on the internet? is it just to get a rise out of people? or is it because you're pathological?

Your entire posting can be found in your information sheet under 'statistics.'

It's all there. You, of all people, don't get to decide what is proof.

 

[JakeStarkey]

1. they do move posts

2. if you're getting those PM's, report them as harassment, that is uncalled for. especially if you keep getting them.

People are allowed to harass in PM's now. They can send porn. They can use the n-word. They can flood the inbox when asked not to. It's not moderated.

Unless the rules have changed yet again.

pretty sure that is not true. a certain fake poster claimed i was harrassing him and now it is against the rules for either of us to PM each other.

That person you accuse told me that you were harassing that poster, that you tried to set him up, and you got hammered. True or false?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Can't blame Strom Thurmond. Some girls giving birth to a baby never knew who the father is.

Maybe that is the reason they all call each other brother and sister.

Since he knew he was the father why cant we blame him?

He could only know what the gold digger might have told him about who the father of her baby was.

Why acknowledge something that may be nothing but an outrageous lie of a promiscuous skank?

The mother was his maid, she was young, she had no boy friend, and you are defending an action that is filthy in the light of social conservatives

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yurt, prove it comes from both sides equally?

Give us specific, documented evidence, and then quantify it.

 

[Yurt]

Yurt, prove it comes from both sides equally?

Give us specific, documented evidence, and then quantify it.

when you actually back up a claim jake....then you can ask me. until then....you're just another two faced hypocrite.

you've been asked repeatedly to back your claims, like most child molesters are rightwingers....and then this thread....you said "much" of the anger is from the right.

you never back up your claims, but oddly, you always demand others do so. and yet, some on this board still give you credibility. nice circle jerk you have.

 

[Yurt]

People are allowed to harass in PM's now. They can send porn. They can use the n-word. They can flood the inbox when asked not to. It's not moderated.

Unless the rules have changed yet again.

pretty sure that is not true. a certain fake poster claimed i was harrassing him and now it is against the rules for either of us to PM each other.

That person you accuse told me that you were harassing that poster, that you tried to set him up, and you got hammered. True or false?

do you give me permission to post your PM's about this? i know you won't, because your post is an entire lie.

 

[Kondor3]

There is enough blame to go around for all concerned... not just left nor right...

 

[Nutz]

you're being unfair in judging this board and CK, you need to speak up

again [MENTION=36528]cereal_killer[/MENTION]

I'm not being unfair at all. The thread is about why there is so much anger on this forum...I am explaining why. The board caters to, encourages and supports angry people. Period.

bullshit. period.

OK, are you saying this forum consists of people of good and common demeanor who offer nothing but goodwill and tidings to their fellow members?

This forum encourages flaming, it praises racism, and tolerates personal attacks. It is what it is...there is no point trying to make it out to be something it isn't. Pretending it is above that - is nonsense and does no good.

I accept that many of the members are very angry racists. I accept this forum for what it is...a minii-stormfront.

USMB...a stormfront affiliated forum where it is fashionable to give a thumbs up (but remain awkwardly silent) to the pussy brigade when they insult entire races and post nonstop nonsense threads about the inferiority of blacks, the Jewish conspiracies, dem evil gays and anyone else who doesn't conform to them.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yurt, prove it comes from both sides equally?

Give us specific, documented evidence, and then quantify it.

when you actually back up a claim jake....then you can ask me. until then....you're just another two faced hypocrite.

you've been asked repeatedly to back your claims, like most child molesters are rightwingers....and then this thread....you said "much" of the anger is from the right.

you never back up your claims, but oddly, you always demand others do so. and yet, some on this board still give you credibility. nice circle jerk you have.

Notice the anger, folks?

Yurt normally can't back his claims. When he does try, he fails and then gets mad.

I do believe "much" of the anger is from the right, and I think that most child molesters are from the far right.

You can't disprove either of them.

I will continue to treat Yurt as he tries to treat others, and then he ends up crying like above.

 

[JakeStarkey]

pretty sure that is not true. a certain fake poster claimed i was harrassing him and now it is against the rules for either of us to PM each other.

That person you accuse told me that you were harassing that poster, that you tried to set him up, and you got hammered. True or false?

do you give me permission to post your PM's about this? i know you won't, because your post is an entire lie.

True or false, Yurt? You messed up. You are out in the open and no where to hide.

 

[JimH52]

The anger from the right began when Obama was elected in 2008. Then in 2012, when he won his second term, the anger that I have seen on USMB and even among many in the community is unprecedented. I mean look at what is happening in Nevada. Really?

These people are not accepting the rule of law. They are making a mockery of the justice system by thumbing their nose at several court rulings and then defending a criminal. They are pointing their weapons at citizens and law officers. The anger is becoming more and more aggressive in nature.

 

[Nutz]

The anger from the right began when Obama was elected in 2008. Then in 2012, when he won his second term, the anger that I have seen on USMB and even among many in the community is unprecedented. I mean look at what is happening in Nevada. Really?

These people are not accepting the rule of law. They are making a mockery of the justice system by thumbing their nose at several court rulings and then defending a criminal. They are pointing their weapons at citizens and law officers. The anger is becoming more and more aggressive in nature.

It was the same way with Bush. The only difference, regrettably, is race. When you fuse the hate for Obama (non-racial) with racial hate - whether blatant, hidden or misunderstood/ misinterpreted racism - there is a catalyst for finger pointing and vitriol. As long as the the racist pussy squad is encouraged to spread their venom...the anger will continue.

A conservative can't criticize Obama...because the Pussy Brigade has become representative of the right with their major presence on this forum. The left equates any criticism to hate...whether right or wrong. Why? Because the right has allowed the racist to define them.

Conservatives become angry because they are being called racists by the left and they respond in kind...creating the never ending circle of hate, vitriol and anger.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The anger from the right began when Obama was elected in 2008. Then in 2012, when he won his second term, the anger that I have seen on USMB and even among many in the community is unprecedented. I mean look at what is happening in Nevada. Really?

These people are not accepting the rule of law. They are making a mockery of the justice system by thumbing their nose at several court rulings and then defending a criminal. They are pointing their weapons at citizens and law officers. The anger is becoming more and more aggressive in nature.

Some on the far right have such a problem with the consequences of the electoral process (like the confederates in 1860) that they are not only now ignoring the law they are flaunting their violations. And waving weapons around.

The government security is more than a million times able to (1) inflitrate every militia unit and radical cell; (2) have protocol in place when the bad guys act out; and (3) will provide the warriors, munitions, and platforms in place for non-security outfits like BLM

 

[JOSweetHeart]

All that I ever do here is give my two cents on what I find interesting enough to say anything about. If I ever sound mad, it is because of how awful the story/news is.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

 

[R.C. Christian]

Anger against certain persons on this site is deserved. It's been earned.

 

[Yurt]

That person you accuse told me that you were harassing that poster, that you tried to set him up, and you got hammered. True or false?

do you give me permission to post your PM's about this? i know you won't, because your post is an entire lie.

True or false, Yurt? You messed up. You are out in the open and no where to hide.

why won't you give me permission to the post the PM's?

you and i both know why.....

 

[Yurt]

Yurt, prove it comes from both sides equally?

Give us specific, documented evidence, and then quantify it.

when you actually back up a claim jake....then you can ask me. until then....you're just another two faced hypocrite.

you've been asked repeatedly to back your claims, like most child molesters are rightwingers....and then this thread....you said "much" of the anger is from the right.

you never back up your claims, but oddly, you always demand others do so. and yet, some on this board still give you credibility. nice circle jerk you have.

Notice the anger, folks?

Yurt normally can't back his claims. When he does try, he fails and then gets mad.

I do believe "much" of the anger is from the right, and I think that most child molesters are from the far right.

You can't disprove either of them.

I will continue to treat Yurt as he tries to treat others, and then he ends up crying like above.

what an odd post. you finally admit that i was right when you agreed with the OP. and then you bring up another claim about the far right....and then to "prove" your claim.....you say i can't disprove either of them.

jake's method of debate: make a debate point, then demand the other person prove he is wrong.

can anyone explain the fallacy of this to jake? anyone? ''

you beat your dog jake. prove i'm wrong.