why some are against the assault rifle ban is the same reason libbs protect late term abortion .

Went down during the ban & skyrocketed when Republicans put assault type rifles back in the hands of mass killers.
Still lying to yourself, eh?
See post #98.
Explain how the AWB caused -anything- to go down while it was in place.
 
The Assault Weapon ban was like a cure to lower mass shootings.
It lowered the body counts in mass shootings
You are fully aware of the fact you cannot show this to be true.
Are you really this stupid or just dishonest?
 
Clearly said that mass hootings were the dive to pass the Assault Rifle Ban.
Post hoc fallacy.

See below. Tell us how the AWB could have an effect on mass shootings.

View attachment 274273


Some were banned my model.

The Statistics say the ban did have an effect.

Is trhis where you are going to tell me that a shooter with an AR-15 will kill no more people than with a handgun.

The Statistics say the ban did have an effect

this is a lie.......actual research into the ban shows it had no effect......you are lying.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/204431.pdf

The decline in the use of AWs has been due primarily to a reduction in the use of assault pistols (APs), which are used in crime more commonly than assault rifles (ARs).

There has not been a clear decline in the use of ARs, though assessments are complicated by the rarity of crimes with these weapons and by substitution of post-ban rifles that are very similar to the banned AR models.
--------

Should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement. AWs were rarely used in gun crimes even before the ban.
Yet another dishonrest POS who can't grasp the concept of mass shootings & the AWB.


I just gave you actual government research.........and because it doesn't confirm what you feel, you deny it.

Total number of mass public shootings in 2018...... 12. Total Killed.... 93.

Not all of those had rifles used......so the total number killed by rifles is less than the number of people killed by lawnmowers, bees and wasps, and falling........

You have a problem that is more rare than getting hit by lighting and you want to use it as an excuse to ban well over 18 million rifles that are never used in crimes.....
Great Lets ignore kll the children slaughtered in schools.

Problem solved.

Just how many children need to be killed before you pathetic assfucks give a shit?
 
_108213007_us_shootings_comparisons_640_v2-nc.png
 
Nope

The assault weapons ban was an anti crime bill

Many democrat votes were certainly swayed by a mass shooting but that was not the reason for the bill and not why Biden drafted it
That's silly

They didn't ban the weapons that were used in 98% of asaults. Just the ones that looked scary.

That's why the assault weapons ban had virtually zero effect on crime and murder
The AWB 's purpose was not to reduce all gun crime but you assfucks are just too stupid to get it.
Yes it was

It was an anti violent crime bill

That is all it ever was

The AWB was attached to a violent crime bill. It was to address mass shootings.
 
Some were banned my model.

The Statistics say the ban did have an effect.

Is trhis where you are going to tell me that a shooter with an AR-15 will kill no more people than with a handgun.
You're either lying, or being duped into repeating a lie.

The ban had no effect.

All assaults went down.


Went down during the ban & skyrocketed when Republicans put assault type rifles back in the hands of mass killers.


Wrong...you dope.......even if you manage to take all rifles, the shooters will just switch to pistols...

Virginia Tech....32 killed, two pistols.

Luby's Cafe....24 killed, 2 pistols.....

You are irrational and foolish.

If pistols have the same killing power then huy do you want assault type rifles.

We always come back to yet another one pf your stupid arguments.

You kedp saying other guns are just as good in killing people so just use these other guns.

Plus, the AWB did not claim to stop all mass killings. This bring up examples is stupid & naive.

my cure for male breast cancer is stupid because it doesn't cure all cancer argument is stupid

Rifles have different roles in self defense you moron, and rifles are used for sport, hunting, competition as well as self defense.

A criminal needs a weapon they can hide easily...... a home owner needs a weapon to protect their family from both criminals in the ones and twos, and in a general natural disaster or civil disturbance....and in the worst case scenario, against government thugs like in venezuela.....

The Assault weapon ban didn't do anything....at all.......you are lying, and screeching more and more doesn't make it true.

Blah Blah Blah Blah.

You keep claiming that a mass shooter has no advantage with an assault type rifle & rhen claiom you can't live without one.
 
You're either lying, or being duped into repeating a lie.

The ban had no effect.

All assaults went down.


Went down during the ban & skyrocketed when Republicans put assault type rifles back in the hands of mass killers.


Wrong...you dope.......even if you manage to take all rifles, the shooters will just switch to pistols...

Virginia Tech....32 killed, two pistols.

Luby's Cafe....24 killed, 2 pistols.....

You are irrational and foolish.

If pistols have the same killing power then huy do you want assault type rifles.

We always come back to yet another one pf your stupid arguments.

You kedp saying other guns are just as good in killing people so just use these other guns.

Plus, the AWB did not claim to stop all mass killings. This bring up examples is stupid & naive.

my cure for male breast cancer is stupid because it doesn't cure all cancer argument is stupid

Rifles have different roles in self defense you moron, and rifles are used for sport, hunting, competition as well as self defense.

A criminal needs a weapon they can hide easily...... a home owner needs a weapon to protect their family from both criminals in the ones and twos, and in a general natural disaster or civil disturbance....and in the worst case scenario, against government thugs like in venezuela.....

The Assault weapon ban didn't do anything....at all.......you are lying, and screeching more and more doesn't make it true.

Blah Blah Blah Blah.

You keep claiming that a mass shooter has no advantage with an assault type rifle & rhen claiom you can't live without one.
What advantage do you have unarmed against someone with a knife? and yes mass killings happen with a knife.
 
The AWB was attached to a violent crime bill. It was to address mass shootings.
Which it could not in any way do, because it did not in any way limit, much less reduce, the availability of 'assault weapons' - as fully illustrated in post #98.
 
The anti-gun loons refuse to address these basic truths about the 1994 'assault weapon'; ban, and cling to their unsupportable fantasy that it had an effect on mass shootings.

As you can see., the 1994 could not possibly have had an effect, because it did nothing to reduce the availability of the weapons is supposedly banned.

View attachment 274291 View attachment 274292
You know what? You are such a fucking asshole.

As weapons were banned, manufacturers sought ways around it.

There were some that should have been banned that weren't by mistake & some that manufacturers altered to get around the ban.

Statics don't lie. The ban worked.

You & your gum loving buddies can argue all you want but look at the dearhs prior & after the ban & even a dumbass like you can see the differences.
 
[
As weapons were banned, manufacturers sought ways around it.
What's that? The ban did not limit access to 'assault weapons'?
How then did it reduce mass shootings?
You & your gum loving buddies can argue all you want but look at the dearhs prior & after the ban & even a dumbass like you can see the differences.
:lol:
And thus, the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.
:lol:
 
Ten years prior to assault weapon ban: 110 killed
Ten years of the ban (96 killed)
Next Ten years 280 killed
37 Years of Mass Shootings in the U.S. in One Chart
So yresa it did reduced. From the ten years after, it proved the AWB was effective.
:lol:
And thus, the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.
:lol:
Maybe I should clarify.
No. no - you've made it very clear that you believe correlation proves causation.
And thus, the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.
 
Nope

The assault weapons ban was an anti crime bill

Many democrat votes were certainly swayed by a mass shooting but that was not the reason for the bill and not why Biden drafted it
That's silly

They didn't ban the weapons that were used in 98% of asaults. Just the ones that looked scary.

That's why the assault weapons ban had virtually zero effect on crime and murder
The AWB 's purpose was not to reduce all gun crime but you assfucks are just too stupid to get it.
Yes it was

It was an anti violent crime bill

That is all it ever was

The AWB was attached to a violent crime bill. It was to address mass shootings.
Just because you keep saying it doesn't mean you're right

Biden called "assault rifles" a threat to national security that's why they were included in the bill
 

Forum List

Back
Top