Why the the left should NEVER try exploiting the Bible

I don't believe in the existence of heaven or hell. They are man-made construct meant to keep the populace"in line".
They are? That's quite a definitive position without any evidence to back it up.

There is more evidence to support that they don't exist since there is zero to support that they do. My position is actually the logical one. Christians take a much more definitive position with no evidence to support their belief that it does.
 
I don't believe in the existence of heaven or hell. They are man-made construct meant to keep the populace"in line".
They are? That's quite a definitive position without any evidence to back it up.

There is more evidence to support that they don't exist since there is zero to support that they do. My position is actually the logical one. Christians take a much more definitive position with no evidence to support their belief that it does.
Really? There are have been millions of people on their deathbed who have claimed to see relatives and a light. There have been many who have had "Near Death Experiences" that report both heaven and hell. What shred of evidence do you have that they don't exist? Can you name even one pice of evidence that suggests they don't?
 
Ah, so the incentives aren't for the 70+% of the country that is Christian? That's quite a pretzel you twist yourself into to justify hypocrisy. :lol:
If that stat is correct (and I have no idea if it is or not), that still leaves a staggering 30% of the nation that doesn't fit into that category. That's almost 1/3 of an entire nation made up of 330 million people (or 99 million people for those that aren't good at math).

Yes "patriot", that statistic is correct.

Religious Landscape Study

70.06% Christian, 1.9% Jewish, 0.9% scary mooooooslums.

All three Abrahamic religions whose texts require charity. Islam actually has it as one of its main "pillars" of its religion.

I can guarantee you, with 100% certainty, that it was Christians who crafted the law to allow for tax deductions for charity, it was Christians that passed it and a Christian president signed it into law.
 
I don't believe in the existence of heaven or hell. They are man-made construct meant to keep the populace"in line".
They are? That's quite a definitive position without any evidence to back it up.

There is more evidence to support that they don't exist since there is zero to support that they do. My position is actually the logical one. Christians take a much more definitive position with no evidence to support their belief that it does.
Really? There are have been millions of people on their deathbed who have claimed to see relatives and a light. There have been many who have had "Near Death Experiences" that report both heaven and hell. What shred of evidence do you have that they don't exist? Can you name even one pice of evidence that suggests they don't?

That's not evidence of heaven or hell, puppy, that's the brain doing funny shit on the way out the door.
 
The left is all over the news, social media, and even right here on USMB these days attempting to exploit the Bible for their own political gain. Whenever they are incapable of defending their irrational position, aside from screaming racist/homophobe/xenophobe/etc., they will invariably scream "the Bible says to redistribute wealth". The problem, of course, is that the Bible says no such thing. And they would know that if they didn't hate the Bible and religion. It's a bad idea to attempt to quote something one has never read.
Josh Protas, the vice president of public policy at MAZON, a Jewish anti-hunger group...quoted a verse in Leviticus. Not to be outdone, Rep. Jodey Arrington quoted a Bible verse of his own, saying, “If a man will not work he shall not eat.”

“I did hear Mr. Protas, your opening remarks, where you quoted Leviticus, I believe — and I think that’s a great reflection on the character of God and the compassion of God’s heart and how we ought to reflect that compassion in our lives,” Arrington said. “But there’s also, you know, the Scripture, tells us in 2 Thessalonians chapter 3:10, he says, ‘for even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: if a man will not work, he shall not eat.’ And then he goes on to say ‘we hear that some among you are idle.’

Boom! Talk about a knockout blow. This is what happens to a person who doesn't know the Bible and yet attempts to exploit it for the evils of socialism/marxism/communism.

Libs FURIOUS! Texas Republican Has 10 BRUTAL Words For Food Stamp Junkies

"One day a man said to God, “God, I would like to know what Heaven and Hell are like.”

God showed the man two doors. Inside the first one, in the middle of the room, was a large round table with a large pot of stew. It smelled delicious and made the man’s mouth water, but the people sitting around the table were thin and sickly. They appeared to be famished. They were holding spoons with very long handles and each found it possible to reach into the pot of stew and take a spoonful, but because the handle was longer than their arms, they could not get the spoons back into their mouths.

The man shuddered at the sight of their misery and suffering. God said, “You have seen Hell.”

Behind the second door, the room appeared exactly the same. There was the large round table with the large pot of wonderful stew that made the man’s mouth water. The people had the same long-handled spoons, but they were well nourished and plump, laughing and talking.

The man said, “I don’t understand.”

God smiled. It is simple …"

Do you know the difference of the two rooms?
 
I don't believe in the existence of heaven or hell. They are man-made construct meant to keep the populace"in line".
They are? That's quite a definitive position without any evidence to back it up.
Evidence? You have it in reverse. Those who make claims must support them with evidence, or at least reason.
Neither supports "heaven/hell" fantasy.
However, Seawytch's statement is more than reasonable; it's obvious, at least for those educated in anthropology, sociology, and/or psychology.
 
Why would donations need an incentive? Aren't you Christians supposed to do it because Jesus told you to and not because you get a tax break from the government?
1. Not everyone in a Christian sweetie. Just ask all the muslims you want to import from Syria, Iraq, etc.

2. When the government takes 65% of what we earn, it doesn't leave us much to live off of - much less donate. Hence the need for tax deductible donations.

Ah, so the incentives aren't for the 70+% of the country that is Christian? That's quite a pretzel you twist yourself into to justify hypocrisy. :lol:
If that many people were actually Christians, instead of just saying they are when asked by a poll taker, this country would be a vastly different place. The reality is, they are not. In fact, most people have no idea what being a Christian really means.
 
Why would donations need an incentive? Aren't you Christians supposed to do it because Jesus told you to and not because you get a tax break from the government?
1. Not everyone in a Christian sweetie. Just ask all the muslims you want to import from Syria, Iraq, etc.

2. When the government takes 65% of what we earn, it doesn't leave us much to live off of - much less donate. Hence the need for tax deductible donations.

Ah, so the incentives aren't for the 70+% of the country that is Christian? That's quite a pretzel you twist yourself into to justify hypocrisy. :lol:
If that many people were actually Christians, instead of just saying they are when asked by a poll taker, this country would be a vastly different place. The reality is, they are not. In fact, most people have no idea what being a Christian really means.

Whether you feel someone is "actually" a Christian or not is immaterial. They self describe as Christian.

Was it or was it not Christians that passed the tax break for charitable giving?
 
Why would donations need an incentive? Aren't you Christians supposed to do it because Jesus told you to and not because you get a tax break from the government?
1. Not everyone in a Christian sweetie. Just ask all the muslims you want to import from Syria, Iraq, etc.

2. When the government takes 65% of what we earn, it doesn't leave us much to live off of - much less donate. Hence the need for tax deductible donations.

Ah, so the incentives aren't for the 70+% of the country that is Christian? That's quite a pretzel you twist yourself into to justify hypocrisy. :lol:
If that many people were actually Christians, instead of just saying they are when asked by a poll taker, this country would be a vastly different place. The reality is, they are not. In fact, most people have no idea what being a Christian really means.

Whether you feel someone is "actually" a Christian or not is immaterial. They self describe as Christian.

Was it or was it not Christians that passed the tax break for charitable giving?

It's your claim, YOU source it.
 
All I know is that some homeless schmoe like Jesus of humble parents, born in a barn and who as a young adult chilled with a Roman Tax collector [Matt], hung out with a woman of murky repute went to the Temple and literally whipped ass on money changers... he then went about giving free food and drink and medical care to the poor and was exhorting his followers to sell all they had and give it over to the poor does not sound Republican at all even one its y bits y bit ... :hellno:
 
Why would donations need an incentive? Aren't you Christians supposed to do it because Jesus told you to and not because you get a tax break from the government?
1. Not everyone in a Christian sweetie. Just ask all the muslims you want to import from Syria, Iraq, etc.

2. When the government takes 65% of what we earn, it doesn't leave us much to live off of - much less donate. Hence the need for tax deductible donations.

Ah, so the incentives aren't for the 70+% of the country that is Christian? That's quite a pretzel you twist yourself into to justify hypocrisy. :lol:
If that many people were actually Christians, instead of just saying they are when asked by a poll taker, this country would be a vastly different place. The reality is, they are not. In fact, most people have no idea what being a Christian really means.

Whether you feel someone is "actually" a Christian or not is immaterial. They self describe as Christian.

Rachel Dolezal self describes as a black woman. It does not make her one.

Was it or was it not Christians that passed the tax break for charitable giving?

I don't know them. You are saying they are, perhaps you could indicate what leads you to say that? First, why not identify the legislators who voted for the measure? Then we can look at who they were.
 
All I know is that some homeless schmoe like Jesus of humble parents, born in a barn and who as a young adult chilled with a Roman Tax collector [Matt], hung out with a woman of murky repute went to the Temple and literally whipped ass on money changers... he then went about giving free food and drink and medical care to the poor and was exhorting his followers to sell all they had and give it over to the poor does not sound Republican at all even one its y bits y bit ... :hellno:
I think I see your problem, you don't know Jesus very well. First off, He gave freely to all who came to Him, not just the poor. Secondly, He told one man, not all of His disciples, to sell what he had and give it to the poor. In fact, the group had money of their own. Remember Judas? He held it for them.
 
Do you ever wonder what became of the shepherd who owned the flock of sheep that Jesus drowned to kill the demon Legend?
They were pigs, not sheep. The keepers ran back to the town and they all came out to demand that Jesus leave.
 
Why would donations need an incentive? Aren't you Christians supposed to do it because Jesus told you to and not because you get a tax break from the government?
1. Not everyone in a Christian sweetie. Just ask all the muslims you want to import from Syria, Iraq, etc.

2. When the government takes 65% of what we earn, it doesn't leave us much to live off of - much less donate. Hence the need for tax deductible donations.

Ah, so the incentives aren't for the 70+% of the country that is Christian? That's quite a pretzel you twist yourself into to justify hypocrisy. :lol:
If that many people were actually Christians, instead of just saying they are when asked by a poll taker, this country would be a vastly different place. The reality is, they are not. In fact, most people have no idea what being a Christian really means.

Whether you feel someone is "actually" a Christian or not is immaterial. They self describe as Christian.

Rachel Dolezal self describes as a black woman. It does not make her one.

Was it or was it not Christians that passed the tax break for charitable giving?

I don't know them. You are saying they are, perhaps you could indicate what leads you to say that? First, why not identify the legislators who voted for the measure? Then we can look at who they were.

She actually used the term "Trans Racial".
 

Forum List

Back
Top