Why there is bias on who gets prosecuted for crimes.

Slyhunter

Gold Member
Jun 4, 2014
11,347
1,875
290
Florida
Folks call trump a Felon because of a liberal judge and demand they haven't gone after the Democrats. This is why Harris-led office, ATF stonewalling probe into 'collusion' with anti-gun group lawsuit: House Oversight chair

Colmes listed all the evidence that made Hillary quality, then claim she didn't have intent because she was too stupid to know she was violating the law. She graduated from Harvard, and claims she didn't know what destruction of evidence or obstruction of evidence was. She was Secretary of State and claims she didn't know the rules when handling Classified documents were. He wouldn't do that if Hillary was a Republican.

The rules for Republicans are different from the rules for Democrats.
 
Folks call trump a Felon because of a liberal judge and demand they haven't gone after the Democrats. This is why Harris-led office, ATF stonewalling probe into 'collusion' with anti-gun group lawsuit: House Oversight chair

Colmes listed all the evidence that made Hillary quality, then claim she didn't have intent because she was too stupid to know she was violating the law. She graduated from Harvard, and claims she didn't know what destruction of evidence or obstruction of evidence was. She was Secretary of State and claims she didn't know the rules when handling Classified documents were. He wouldn't do that if Hillary was a Republican.

The rules for Republicans are different from the rules for Democrats.
trump is a felon because he has committed and been proven beyond doubt to be guilty .

trump is currently on probation for the ny fraud convictions. if he is at bedminster to hand out the j6 awards it would be a great opportunity for law enforcement to roll up the bunch of them for "associating with known felons," a violation of their probations and paroles.
 
He's a felon because a grand jury recommended indicting him and a jury convicted him based on the evidence they were presented after he was given every opportunity to defend himself in court.

Next.
The evidence presented and not presented was controlled by a biased judge, sustaining or revoking objections made in court.
 
""The White House’s Office of Gun Violence Prevention, overseen by Vice President Harris, is stonewalling the Oversight Committee’s investigation into potential collusion by White House officials with anti-Second Amendment groups despite our multiple requests," Comer continued"
 
This point couldn't be better illustrated than by the difference in how Biden's illegally held classified documents case was handled vs. the exact same charge for Trump who was legally authorized to possess those documents.
It was not "exactly" the same case....and no, convicted felon Trump was not authorized to possess those documents.
 
She graduated from Harvard, and claims she didn't know what destruction of evidence or obstruction of evidence was
There never was any case that she had anything to do with destruction of evidence.
She was Secretary of State and claims she didn't know the rules when handling Classified documents were. He wouldn't do that if Hillary was a Republican.
It wasn’t that she was mishandling classified documents, it was that they discussed classified topics on an unclassified system. Hardly the same as, let’s say, taking home hundreds of classified documents with clear classified markings about military and intelligence secrets and hiding them from the DoJ in your basement.
 
He's a felon because a grand jury recommended indicting him and a jury convicted him based on the evidence they were presented after he was given every opportunity to defend himself in court.

Next.
We don't believe you. If we get attacked again, we will not be united, and you should know that. Perhaps the Communists will use a red area for destruction to test that. The canvas for the painting has been in control of the Progressive artists and any of the Republican members who are frauds for many decades. Finding people who are empowered by the globalists and who hate Trump from the lifetime of propaganda they were fed is not difficult.
 
There never was any case that she had anything to do with destruction of evidence.
Destruction of computer HD's, tablets, and cellphones is exactly destruction of evidence and obstruction due to destruction of evidence she was guilty.
It wasn’t that she was mishandling classified documents, it was that they discussed classified topics on an unclassified system. Hardly the same as, let’s say, taking home hundreds of classified documents with clear classified markings about military and intelligence secrets and hiding them from the DoJ in your basement.
Taking classified stuff home in paper form vs digital form is exactly the same.
 
Destruction of computer HD's, tablets, and cellphones is exactly destruction of evidence and obstruction due to destruction of evidence she was guilty.
There was no evidence connecting her to the destruction of evidence.
Taking classified stuff home in paper form vs digital form is exactly the same.
The defense was that she didn’t know the information was classified when she wrote the emails. They thought they were vague enough and “talking around the information” to avoid it being classified. You can’t use that defense when the papers have the classified markings plastered all over them.
 
trump is a felon because he has committed and been proven beyond doubt to be guilty .

trump is currently on probation for the ny fraud convictions. if he is at bedminster to hand out the j6 awards it would be a great opportunity for law enforcement to roll up the bunch of them for "associating with known felons," a violation of their probations and paroles.
Still no crime mentioned. What was he supposedly convicted of?
 
He's a felon because a grand jury recommended indicting him and a jury convicted him based on the evidence they were presented after he was given every opportunity to defend himself in court.

Next.
He was convicted based on the evidence and law they deliberately hid from the jury, a jury that was composed of 100% progressive Democrats.
 
Ask what he was supposedly convicted of
Which is to My point.

The charges were misdemeanors that had gone beyond their statute of limitations. They tried to upgrade them to felonies by some strange legal theory that says you commit a felony by covering up a misdemeanor or something like that. But here is the kicker.

They never actually listed the specifics of the felony charges.

The judge gave a grab bag of something like 3 separate possible charges that could convict.

At no time did the Defense have a list of tangible broken laws to defend against. That is a violation of due process.

The Judge was deceitful and violated the law.

This will be overturned on appeal.
 
It's called prosecutorial discretion, and it is the tool that DAs and prosecutors use to tilt the table in whatever angle they feel is politically expedient ( in their hoods).
Prosecutorial discretion is the authority that prosecutors have to make decisions in criminal and immigration cases:


  • Criminal cases
    Prosecutors can use their discretion to decide whether to charge someone for a crime, which charges to file, and how to direct the case through the legal system. Prosecutors consider many factors when making these decisions, including the strength of the evidence, the seriousness of the crime, and the defendant's criminal record. Plea bargains are a common result of prosecutorial discretion.


 

Forum List

Back
Top