Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 71,438
- 35,789
- 2,615
Not after he left office he didn’tBiden violated the law as a Senator, the President didn't violate the law since he had Presidential powers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not after he left office he didn’tBiden violated the law as a Senator, the President didn't violate the law since he had Presidential powers.
Biden blatantly broke multiple classified docs laws, multiple times. Pair that with the Biden crime family selling influence all over the globe. But the DC swamp said, nothing to see here move along.This point couldn't be better illustrated than by the difference in how Biden's illegally held classified documents case was handled vs. the exact same charge for Trump who was legally authorized to possess those documents.
We call Trump a felon because he committed 34 felonies.Folks call trump a Felon because of a liberal judge and demand they haven't gone after the Democrats. This is why Harris-led office, ATF stonewalling probe into 'collusion' with anti-gun group lawsuit: House Oversight chair
Colmes listed all the evidence that made Hillary quality, then claim she didn't have intent because she was too stupid to know she was violating the law. She graduated from Harvard, and claims she didn't know what destruction of evidence or obstruction of evidence was. She was Secretary of State and claims she didn't know the rules when handling Classified documents were. He wouldn't do that if Hillary was a Republican.
The rules for Republicans are different from the rules for Democrats.
She admitted to taking a hammer to them.There was no evidence connecting her to the destruction of evidence.
I.e. she was too stupid. Therefore, she wasn't educated enough to be Secretary of State.The defense was that she didn’t know the information was classified when she wrote the emails. They thought they were vague enough and “talking around the information” to avoid it being classified. You can’t use that defense when the papers have the classified markings plastered all over them.
The only bias lies with your own inability to parse information honestly.Folks call trump a Felon because of a liberal judge and demand they haven't gone after the Democrats. This is why Harris-led office, ATF stonewalling probe into 'collusion' with anti-gun group lawsuit: House Oversight chair
Colmes listed all the evidence that made Hillary quality, then claim she didn't have intent because she was too stupid to know she was violating the law. She graduated from Harvard, and claims she didn't know what destruction of evidence or obstruction of evidence was. She was Secretary of State and claims she didn't know the rules when handling Classified documents were. He wouldn't do that if Hillary was a Republican.
The rules for Republicans are different from the rules for Democrats.
Or your alleged ignorance of it, I.E. Your blinders.The only bias lies with your own inability to parse information honestly.
Trump was given ample opportunity to return documents when requested to do so. No?This point couldn't be better illustrated than by the difference in how Biden's illegally held classified documents case was handled vs. the exact same charge for Trump who was legally authorized to possess those documents.
We don't believe you. If we get attacked again, we will not be united, and you should know that. Perhaps the Communists will use a red area for destruction to test that. The canvas for the painting has been in control of the Progressive artists and any of the Republican members who are frauds for many decades. Finding people who are empowered by the globalists and who hate Trump from the lifetime of propaganda they were fed is not difficult.
That is entirely your choice and the consequences of that choice are yours alone.We don't believe you.
I’m ignorant of nothing. My understanding comports with reality.Or your alleged ignorance of it, I.E. Your blinders.
That wasn’t destruction of evidence. It occurred way before any investigation took place.She admitted to taking a hammer to them.
The facts make it harder to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Sorry.I.e. she was too stupid. Therefore, she wasn't educated enough to be Secretary of State.
Nope it wasn’t. That charge is a misdemeanor and it had expiredare you deaf? FRAUD
Then post the crime he was convicted onI’m ignorant of nothing. My understanding comports with reality.
It is you who is at odds with reality.![]()
It was never added to the chargesWhich is to My point.
The charges were misdemeanors that had gone beyond their statute of limitations. They tried to upgrade them to felonies by some strange legal theory that says you commit a felony by covering up a misdemeanor or something like that. But here is the kicker.
They never actually listed the specifics of the felony charges.
The judge gave a grab bag of something like 3 separate possible charges that could convict.
At no time did the Defense have a list of tangible broken laws to defend against. That is a violation of due process.
The Judge was deceitful and violated the law.
This will be overturned on appeal.
That is the problem.We don't believe you.
I believe facts, post oneThat is the problem.
You, and basically all Trump supporters, do not 'believe' facts, evidence or reality. Just Trump.
It is sick.
Needed a Judge's warrant before going in.Trump was given ample opportunity to return documents when requested to do so. No?
Choosing to obstruct justice was his own choice as well. Right?