Why Trump Was Charged On Secret Documents And Clinton, Pence Were Not

[Fort Fun Indiana]

TDS

You don't know what a non sequitur is. It's a stupid error you make all the time. You should read up on it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So it's the Orange Man Bad precedent. Interesting. Possessing the documents, not a crime; Orange Man, crime

Trump isn't charged simply with possessing the documents.

Frank, if you would actually read up on a topic once in a while before commenting, you wouldn't say so many stupid things.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Trump isn't charged simply with possessing the documents.

Frank, if you would actually read up on a topic once in a while before commenting, you wouldn't say so many stupid things.

Possession by a democrat = not a crime; Orange Man possession = crime

Rule #1 in America 2.0: It's not a crime when a democrat does it

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Possession by a democrat = not a crime; Orange Man possession = crime

Wrong and idiotic, for the reason already stated.

You have a high tolerance for embarrassment.

 

[beagle9]

So what protocol required her to keep emails from a job three years after she left it?

Government protocol, otherwise as it pertains to official government business. Don't give this bull shite of them being birthday party memories and other such ludicrous stupidity you knuckleheads and her tried to sell the public on.

 

[beagle9]

Not well. Fact is that using her own server was more convenient for her.

No, you need more than that. Deleted by whom? Not by Clinton.

Matters now by whom, because she was the property owner of the email's.

 

[Marener]

Matters now by whom, because she was the property owner of the email's.

It matters if you want to charge them with doing something it helps if you can demonstrate they actually did it.

 

[FA_Q2]

Indictments say we are persecuting you and not Biden because we think your secret documents are what?

As you see, they cannot read them. If they did, it would be obvious why such a statement is nonsensical. You do not even know what he is charged with but declare confidently that he is innocent.

Willful ignorance.

The difference has been pointed out several times already. Even on this very page.

 

[FA_Q2]

If you are, allegedly, competent to be the US president, that, allegedly, is supposed to be the top job in the world, then you should have the brains not to take classified documents. For fucks sake, even the US president should have the brains and ability to order a Latte out of a fucking vending machine. So what you're saying is, your presidents are thick as fuck and a janitor in outer Mongolia is more qualified. Let's be honest, a stationary object is faster than your current paedophile president.

Said like someone that has never dealt with classified information.

Laymen have no concept of the absolute volume of classified information of how prevalent it is when holding high office.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wrong and idiotic, for the reason already stated.

You have a high tolerance for embarrassment.

You keep making up imaginary legal standards and expect me to believe them....not going to happen!

Bide had classified documents, so did Hillary, but the Bad Orange man, WHO WAS PRESIDENT is charged....because...he...hurt...mah....feelz

 

[CrusaderFrank]

????
Explain yourself (or your avatar)....poster CF.

The avatar is a house in Tuscany

 

[FA_Q2]

You keep making up imaginary legal standards and expect me to believe them....not going to happen!

Bide had classified documents, so did Hillary, but the Bad Orange man, WHO WAS PRESIDENT is charged....because...he...hurt...mah....feelz

The indictments are there for you to read anytime you actually start to care about truth. They will show you the material difference.

But you wont read them and you will absolutely NEVER face the material difference or explain why it should not matter because you and the rest of the Trump crowed do not care about facts or truth. Just Trump.

It amazes me how Trumpsters bleat out ignorance on purpose and embrace it as though ignorance was a virtue.

 

[beagle9]

It matters if you want to charge them with doing something it helps if you can demonstrate they actually did it.

Oh it's been demonstrated, but denial reigns supreme among leftist power groups who hope to protect their hive.

 

[beagle9]

Said like someone that has never dealt with classified information.

Laymen have no concept of the absolute volume of classified information of how prevalent it is when holding high office.

Prevalent until Trump was involved, then you'd think it was the rarest of jewels.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The indictments are there for you to read anytime you actually start to care about truth. They will show you the material difference.

But you wont read them and you will absolutely NEVER face the material difference or explain why it should not matter because you and the rest of the Trump crowed do not care about facts or truth. Just Trump.

It amazes me how Trumpsters bleat out ignorance on purpose and embrace it as though ignorance was a virtue.

Explain why it’s a crime for Trump, but not Hillary or Biden..,,go!

 

[SeaMajor7]

Explain why it’s a crime for Trump, but not Hillary or Biden..,,go!

All the demented LEFT have is more gaslighting obfuscation pretzel twisting LIES.
It's Different when they do what they accuse others of.

 

[beagle9]

All the demented LEFT have is more gaslighting obfuscation pretzel twisting LIES.
It's Different when they do what they accuse others of.

The corruption is exceedingly great these days, and it's causing the eyes of the bewildered and oppressed to fail. The earth with her blood of the saints flowing like rivers now, along with it's cries (just as it was in the days of Cain and Able), rises up to the gates, and it's cries shall be heard in regards too.

 

[Marener]

Oh it's been demonstrated, but denial reigns supreme among leftist power groups who hope to protect their hive.

Are you sure? Let’s see it.

 

[Chillicothe]

Tell us again how it's not a crime because democrats never intend to get caught
.....Rule #1 in America 2.0: It's not a crime when a democrat does it

The avatar is a house in Tuscany

----------------------------------------
The 'Tuscany' thing was fun.
However, it is still dodgem'.
Explain your allegation that crimes aren't crimes if Democrats commit 'em.

Frank, don't simply and merely be a slogan-slinger. Show the forum that you have gravitas, and serious thoughts about important issues. Slingin' slogans is for 16yr olds attempting to impress 14yr old girls.

Show us that you and MAGA and QAnon are really serious players that need to be taken seriously by mature educated Americans.

 

[Chillicothe]

"The earth with her blood of the saints flowing like rivers now, along with it's cries (just as it was in the days of Cain and Able), rises up to the gates, and it's cries shall be heard in regards too."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


No disrespect intended, good poster 'beagle', but.....

But what da hell are you trying to convey in the comment quoted above?

Son, you may be trying too hard here.