Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? Even when the FBI issues a subpoena for the emails? Wow!
"This new learning amazes me!"
Golly, CF, you seem so unusually obtuse on some things.So it's the Orange Man Bad precedent. Interesting. Possessing the documents, not a crime; Orange Man, crime
Bill Clinton fired droves when he took office. Replaced them with buddies.Golly, CF, you seem so unusually obtuse on some things.
I mean by that, there have been any number of articulate and perceptive posts by others.....that clearly described that lying, getting others to lie, hiding, defying a lawful subpoena....well, those things make a difference in this kind of case and circumstance.
Yet, you ---again ---retreat into this petulant "Orange Man Bad" defense.
What's up with that?
Bill Clinton fired droves when he took office. Replaced them with buddies.
Trump was too new not to do the same
Golly, CF, you seem so unusually obtuse on some things.
I mean by that, there have been any number of articulate and perceptive posts by others.....that clearly described that lying, getting others to lie, hiding, defying a lawful subpoena....well, those things make a difference in this kind of case and circumstance.
Yet, you ---again ---retreat into this petulant "Orange Man Bad" defense.
What's up with that?
It shouldn't. The FBI issued a subpoena long after she cleaned her server. You have the sequence of events wrong, as usual.
When she was no longer secretary of state, there was no reason for her to keep those emails, most of which were copied on State Department servers, anyway.
Indictments say we are persecuting you and not Biden because we think your secret documents are what?You have been given the indictments. Every Trump supporter I have seen thus far has failed to read them in any shape or form because you need your thinking done for you by pundits as every good dogmatic believer does. Why would anyone bother anymore.
If you are, allegedly, competent to be the US president, that, allegedly, is supposed to be the top job in the world, then you should have the brains not to take classified documents. For fucks sake, even the US president should have the brains and ability to order a Latte out of a fucking vending machine. So what you're saying is, your presidents are thick as fuck and a janitor in outer Mongolia is more qualified. Let's be honest, a stationary object is faster than your current paedophile president.There are plenty of reasonable ways to have classified spillage that doesn't necessarily involve incompetence. But that's not the question. You are trying to argue that any such spillage automatically does, or at least should be prosecuted. Moving the goalposts from "it's criminal" to "it makes a person incompetent" is exactly that.
I responded because your analogy was faulty making the conclusion you reached on the basis of that analogy also faulty. I told you how to make it more accurate. So, here's my question.
Would you find it reasonable for a court to convict someone of shoplifting who is shown to have brought the goods back without prompting while explaining it happened inadvertently? Do you think a judge let alone a jury would convict such a person?
Fake indictments aren't worth reading.. Everyone knows what the hell is going on, and that's why Trump's pole numbers are off the chain. Stay tuned dummies..You have been given the indictments. Every Trump supporter I have seen thus far has failed to read them in any shape or form because you need your thinking done for you by pundits as every good dogmatic believer does. Why would anyone bother anymore.
So she told the FBI, the server is clear? That's amazing! She destroyed evidence, but that's cool because she never intended to get caught
She's wasn't like all of us (she was a government official bound by rules and protocols that we aren't bound by), but nice try agitator.She never did anything wrong.
She stopped being Secretary of State in 2013. The FBI didn't come looking for these files until 2015.
She did what almost all of us do, deleted emails that were no longer relevant.
Of course she was. that was the whole point of her home brewed server- to avoid public scrutiny. And deleting tens of thousands of emails after receiving a congressional subpoena? Give us a break.Not even close. Clinton wasn’t taking clearly labeled classified documents and placing them on her server. She also wasn’t trying to cover anything up.
Tell us again how it's not a crime because democrats never intend to get caught
Could never be proven in court. All indications were that it was used for convenience. There was no evidence Clinton ordered the server to be deleted after the subpoena.Of course she was. that was the whole point of her home brewed server- to avoid public scrutiny. And deleting tens of thousands of emails after receiving a congressional subpoena? Give us a break.
Bill Clinton fired droves when he took office. Replaced them with buddies.
She's wasn't like all of us (she was a government official bound by rules and protocols that we aren't bound by), but nice try agitator.
Huh? Why is more convenient? In fact, it is significantly less convenient operating and maintaining her own private server rather than using the government's system.Could never be proven in court. All indications were that it was used for convenience.
Just a big old coincidence that they were deleted three weeks after she received the subpoena? LOLThere was no evidence Clinton ordered the server to be deleted after the subpoena.
backatcha.You don’t know what you’re talking about.
The government email system was horseshit. It was often down. Access was limited to devices she was unfamiliar with. It was very inconvenient and poorly functional. Clinton’s private server already existed before she became SoS. It took no additional work to repurpose it for her work.Huh? Why is more convenient? In fact, it is significantly less convenient operating and maintaining her own private server rather than using the government's system.
You’re going to need some more evidence than that. Is that all you have?Just a big old coincidence that they were deleted three weeks after she received the subpoena? LOL
Watch and learn.backatcha.
Blah Blah Blah. Seems to have worked for the 77,000 other State Department employees.The government email system was horseshit. It was often down. Access was limited to devices she was unfamiliar with. It was very inconvenient and poorly functional. Clinton’s private server already existed before she became SoS. It took no additional work to repurpose it for her work.
No, That's actually all you need. These emails were under a Congressional subpoena and they were deleted.So yeah. More convenient.
You’re going to need some more evidence than that. Is that all you have?
Sit and rotate.Watch and learn.
Not well. Fact is that using her own server was more convenient for her.Blah Blah Blah. Seems to have worked for the 77,000 other State Department employees.
No, you need more than that. Deleted by whom? Not by Clinton.No, That's actually all you need. These emails were under a Congressional subpoena and they were deleted.
