Hang on Sloopy
Diamond Member
- Jul 12, 2015
- 20,793
- 28,088
and you were wrong about everything covid dr lesh....you got sucked up just like dizzy and uyb
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NOPE, it's still shoplifting, getting CHARGED with shoplifting is up to the petitioner.So in your eyes, shoplifting is only shoplifting only if the shop presses charges?
NOPE.Bank robbery is only bank robbery if the bank only presses charges?
About right, again, THAT would be up to the attorney general and like forkup stated.............INTENT.Taking classified documents is only taking classified documents if the government presses charges?
No offence, I reckon you think WWII was fought in black and white.
When dealing with massive amounts of documents over decades, it’s not unreasonable that a few documents are misplaced.Do you think someone who has the brains to 'accidently' take classified documents be in that job? Do you think that's a competent or desired trait? If you interviewed someone and they said, "Oh, I might accidentally take your company secrets because that's just me", would you hire them? Sounds like my Jack Russell is more competent than your president.
And like wise, someone saying, "I would purposely take the classified documents", is equally unsuitable for the job. The US seems to be having a run of unsuitable presidents, but we all know that.
What happens if the shop or bank doesn't press charges but the police do?There was more to it than that and you know it.
That you ignored the fact that intent matters greatly just speaks to your dishonesty or stupidity.
You pick
Just like HilLIARy did with her email server. But then again, she's YOUR team so she gets a pass, amirite?When dealing with massive amounts of documents over decades, it’s not unreasonable that a few documents are misplaced.
The problem is when it’s someone has clearly done it intentionally and clearly tried to cover it up.
Not even close. Clinton wasn’t taking clearly labeled classified documents and placing them on her server. She also wasn’t trying to cover anything up.Just like HilLIARy did with her email server. But then again, she's YOUR team so she gets a pass, amirite?
Not even close. Clinton wasn’t taking clearly labeled classified documents and placing them on her server. She also wasn’t trying to cover anything up.
Actually it matters a lot.Doesn't matter. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, even if it means locking up that old c*nt.
Yeah, because the Benghazi Bitch is YOUR team. You are nothing but a fuckface Communist longing for an America without any political opposition, asshole.Actually it matters a lot.
You sound like you need therapy before you break.Yeah, because the Benghazi Bitch is YOUR team. You are nothing but a fuckface Communist longing for an America without any political opposition, asshole.
As soon as the Biden folks realized that these docs where, they returned them.
There is no evidence otherwise and it shows lack of intent and certainly obstruction or conspiracy.
You know that
(Tell us again how you’re not a Trump fan ya lying fuck)
That is exactly the opposite of what happened with Trump.
He lied and obstructed for almost two years to the point of instructing his lawyers to lie about what had been returned.
As soon as the Biden folks realized that these docs where, they returned them.
Tell us again how you’re not a Trump fan ya lying fuck)
Trump was not charged with having those top secret classified documents. Just like, Biden and Pence and Clinton were not charged. Even, Steven! Equal justice under the law.Yeah, they magically discovered them when trump was found with them. That shows intent. They intended to keep them until the eyes of Nara and other people were on trump.
The argument is that Biden didn’t know they had them. If that’s the case, then what prompted them to “go oh, hey, we better look for documents”
If nobody had started looking Trump, those documents would still be in bidens gargage…indefinitely.
Other than being quite rude, I’m not a trump fan. What I am is, not a leftists fan. Just because I point out the antics you all pull on trump doesn’t mean I support HIM, it means I push back on leftists. I’ve said this before, but I know it doesn’t land with dems because they love to paint everyone with a broad brush. If they think it, it must be true.
It is possible to defend actions against someone without supporting that person.
I’ve said it many time (you can look this up), I don’t support a person, I support the party and the ideology.
THE TRUTH LOLHe doesn't need the job. This isn't his career. He left government jobs years ago and works for the Hague....he lives in the Netherlands. He was brought in as a Special Counsel because he has no connection to Garland or the administration...including President Biden.
All the garbage spread about him is just that, garbage.... a deflection from truth.
There are plenty of reasonable ways to have classified spillage that doesn't necessarily involve incompetence. But that's not the question. You are trying to argue that any such spillage automatically does, or at least should be prosecuted. Moving the goalposts from "it's criminal" to "it makes a person incompetent" is exactly that.Do you think someone who has the brains to 'accidently' take classified documents be in that job? Do you think that's a competent or desired trait? If you interviewed someone and they said, "Oh, I might accidentally take your company secrets because that's just me", would you hire them? Sounds like my Jack Russell is more competent than your president.
And like wise, someone saying, "I would purposely take the classified documents", is equally unsuitable for the job. The US seems to be having a run of unsuitable presidents, but we all know that.
True.If Trump had returned ALL the classified documents he took, as Biden, Pence, and Clinton had done, there would be no indictment.
Yup, they were probably copies of copies. And there were so few of them no one noticed.
Trump backed up a big old truck and took out hundreds of boxes of classified documents. That's why NARA Noticed.
It tells me that we classify too many things, which is why people don't take it as seriously as they should.
For instance, one of the "classified" documents on the Hillary Scandal was a NY Times report about US drone strikes against Taliban targets in Pakistan.
Why was it a "Secret"? Everyone knew it was happening, but because the official stance was that we weren't doing that (when everyone knew we were) it was classified as a secret.
Yup, they were probably copies of copies. And there were so few of them no one noticed.
It tells me that we classify too many things, which is why people don't take it as seriously as they should.
Aren’t the copies of copies tracked also? I mean, you’re making the case that it’s just entirely too easy to steal classified documents. We’re talking about Biden allegedly accidentally having classified information, imagine the secrets someone could steal if they were really trying. Wow..and they say we have the greatest intelligence agencies in the world…lol…pretty shitty if you ask me if someone could casually stroll out the door with classified information, store it in their garage in cardboard boxes for 30 years, and nobody was any the wiser. Lol…that’s pretty amateur if you ask me..
Sure we do. The Special Counsel reviewed it, determined there was no criminal intent, and let it go.Maybe, but it still tells a large tale of our security protocols, it also doesn’t explain the fact that Biden had classified information unsecured, in multiple places, for so long. It doesn’t matter that if was something inconsequential, we don’t get to just ignore rules of classified information because someone seems it not very relevant.
What pray tell makes the subpoena illegal?
Trump was not charged with having those top secret classified documents. Just like, Biden and Pence and Clinton were not charged. Even, Steven! Equal justice under the law.
What part of that, do you not understand?