FA_Q2
Gold Member
- Dec 12, 2009
- 25,474
- 6,788
Were we talking about robbery? Nope, that would be YOUR IMAGINARY legal standard. Were we talking about giving money back? No, that would be your imaginary legal standard. That is why reading the indictments would help, they would tell you directly the standards that are in play and the legal sections that apply. But you can't do that, can you? Instead you talk about law that is not even relevant.So if a bank robber gives the money back — eventually— there’s no crime? See how ridiculous and imaginary your legal standard becomes?
You make shit up to lie about the standards and then claim it is others using an imaginary standard.
Do you think you could address the actual standards in play here or are you going to just lie some more. We all know the answer to that already.