Why Trump's many scandals simply don't resonate with the American people.

[danielpalos]

silly; it is exogenous to myself.

Not when you are unaccountable.

i am accountable to my stockholders; not everybody.

You are accountable for everything you do.

good thing i don't resort to fallacy. what would, St. Pete, say.

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

 

[RASTAMEN]

There are just too many.

When you have four presidents that entered office with a single civil suit against each one of them, then you have Trump with more than 70, it just doesn't seem possible. It seems like it must be fake news.

They still talk about the Clinton Foundation, but bring up the Trump Foundation and it's fake news.

And his nominees. A new basket of deplorable straight out of a swamp. They are so horrible, one after the other, when new info comes up on them, is just seems like more fake news. People just can't that bad. Or can they?

Take his Carrier deal. Many right wingers think he did an amazing thing. Then you look at the facts. It wasn't 1100 jobs saved. It was 730. And the CEO said he is going to take the millions he got from Trump and Pence and use it to automate. Meaning at least half of those will be gone. And when you explain that to the right wing, they just deny it. It can't be. It's fake news.

What happens when it's no longer fake?

Like I said. It's a train wreck. We can see it coming.

You weren't concerned about Obama's many scandals. Why the hypocrisy?

List Obama SCANDALS!!!! Remember President Obama after 8 years in office leaves office with a 60 percent approval.

 

[Leweman]

It's spelled CLINTON

 

[Leweman]

There are just too many.

When you have four presidents that entered office with a single civil suit against each one of them, then you have Trump with more than 70, it just doesn't seem possible. It seems like it must be fake news.

They still talk about the Clinton Foundation, but bring up the Trump Foundation and it's fake news.

And his nominees. A new basket of deplorable straight out of a swamp. They are so horrible, one after the other, when new info comes up on them, is just seems like more fake news. People just can't that bad. Or can they?

Take his Carrier deal. Many right wingers think he did an amazing thing. Then you look at the facts. It wasn't 1100 jobs saved. It was 730. And the CEO said he is going to take the millions he got from Trump and Pence and use it to automate. Meaning at least half of those will be gone. And when you explain that to the right wing, they just deny it. It can't be. It's fake news.

What happens when it's no longer fake?

Like I said. It's a train wreck. We can see it coming.

You weren't concerned about Obama's many scandals. Why the hypocrisy?

List Obama SCANDALS!!!! Remember President Obama after 8 years in office leaves office with a 60 percent approval.

And 99 percent from the minuscule group of people that present the majority of the people with their information.

 

[12icer]

List Obama SCANDALS!!!! Remember President Obama after 8 years in office leaves office with a 60 percent approval.

TOO MANY TO EVEN BEGIN to list they start at AA, and go to ZZ. Theft, graft, violation of the separation of powers hundreds of times, murder daily, interjecting himself in things he should not have, OSHITCARE lies, LIES, TREASON, Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the state, LIES, Theft of billions of taxpayer dollars by the global warming scam green energy initiative. You didn't mind al shitass gore getting 98 million of OUIR dollars for just ONE company going belly up did you, lies theft. supporting violence, promoting conflict, conspiring to defraud the public of billions of dollars through government programs. OSHITCARE>> just an infinitesimally smalllllll list of thousands.

 

[ding]

Not when you are unaccountable.

i am accountable to my stockholders; not everybody.

You are accountable for everything you do.

good thing i don't resort to fallacy. what would, St. Pete, say.

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

 

[tycho1572]

There are just too many.

When you have four presidents that entered office with a single civil suit against each one of them, then you have Trump with more than 70, it just doesn't seem possible. It seems like it must be fake news.

They still talk about the Clinton Foundation, but bring up the Trump Foundation and it's fake news.

And his nominees. A new basket of deplorable straight out of a swamp. They are so horrible, one after the other, when new info comes up on them, is just seems like more fake news. People just can't that bad. Or can they?

Take his Carrier deal. Many right wingers think he did an amazing thing. Then you look at the facts. It wasn't 1100 jobs saved. It was 730. And the CEO said he is going to take the millions he got from Trump and Pence and use it to automate. Meaning at least half of those will be gone. And when you explain that to the right wing, they just deny it. It can't be. It's fake news.

What happens when it's no longer fake?

Like I said. It's a train wreck. We can see it coming.

Enjoy your idea of a train wreck while millions enjoy having a job, rdean.

 

[danielpalos]

i am accountable to my stockholders; not everybody.

You are accountable for everything you do.

good thing i don't resort to fallacy. what would, St. Pete, say.

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

Moral values are subjective. Why do you believe they aren't?

 

[ding]

Outcomes.

You are accountable for everything you do.

good thing i don't resort to fallacy. what would, St. Pete, say.

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

Moral values are subjective. Why do you believe they aren't?

Outcomes

 

[gipper]

There are just too many.

When you have four presidents that entered office with a single civil suit against each one of them, then you have Trump with more than 70, it just doesn't seem possible. It seems like it must be fake news.

They still talk about the Clinton Foundation, but bring up the Trump Foundation and it's fake news.

And his nominees. A new basket of deplorable straight out of a swamp. They are so horrible, one after the other, when new info comes up on them, is just seems like more fake news. People just can't that bad. Or can they?

Take his Carrier deal. Many right wingers think he did an amazing thing. Then you look at the facts. It wasn't 1100 jobs saved. It was 730. And the CEO said he is going to take the millions he got from Trump and Pence and use it to automate. Meaning at least half of those will be gone. And when you explain that to the right wing, they just deny it. It can't be. It's fake news.

What happens when it's no longer fake?

Like I said. It's a train wreck. We can see it coming.

You weren't concerned about Obama's many scandals. Why the hypocrisy?

List Obama SCANDALS!!!! Remember President Obama after 8 years in office leaves office with a 60 percent approval.

His scandals are numerous and impeachable, but you likely know nothing them.

 

[RASTAMEN]

There are just too many.

When you have four presidents that entered office with a single civil suit against each one of them, then you have Trump with more than 70, it just doesn't seem possible. It seems like it must be fake news.

They still talk about the Clinton Foundation, but bring up the Trump Foundation and it's fake news.

And his nominees. A new basket of deplorable straight out of a swamp. They are so horrible, one after the other, when new info comes up on them, is just seems like more fake news. People just can't that bad. Or can they?

Take his Carrier deal. Many right wingers think he did an amazing thing. Then you look at the facts. It wasn't 1100 jobs saved. It was 730. And the CEO said he is going to take the millions he got from Trump and Pence and use it to automate. Meaning at least half of those will be gone. And when you explain that to the right wing, they just deny it. It can't be. It's fake news.

What happens when it's no longer fake?

Like I said. It's a train wreck. We can see it coming.

You weren't concerned about Obama's many scandals. Why the hypocrisy?

List Obama SCANDALS!!!! Remember President Obama after 8 years in office leaves office with a 60 percent approval.

His scandals are numerous and impeachable, but you likely know nothing them.

Well the Gipper is 6ft under. Perhaps you can dig up Ole Ronny Boo to help you with your research to find all those Obama Scandals. If Trump's Dementia wasn't at an advance stage perhaps he could lend you hand.

 

[gipper]

There are just too many.

When you have four presidents that entered office with a single civil suit against each one of them, then you have Trump with more than 70, it just doesn't seem possible. It seems like it must be fake news.

They still talk about the Clinton Foundation, but bring up the Trump Foundation and it's fake news.

And his nominees. A new basket of deplorable straight out of a swamp. They are so horrible, one after the other, when new info comes up on them, is just seems like more fake news. People just can't that bad. Or can they?

Take his Carrier deal. Many right wingers think he did an amazing thing. Then you look at the facts. It wasn't 1100 jobs saved. It was 730. And the CEO said he is going to take the millions he got from Trump and Pence and use it to automate. Meaning at least half of those will be gone. And when you explain that to the right wing, they just deny it. It can't be. It's fake news.

What happens when it's no longer fake?

Like I said. It's a train wreck. We can see it coming.

You weren't concerned about Obama's many scandals. Why the hypocrisy?

List Obama SCANDALS!!!! Remember President Obama after 8 years in office leaves office with a 60 percent approval.

His scandals are numerous and impeachable, but you likely know nothing them.

Well the Gipper is 6ft under. Perhaps you can dig up Ole Ronny Boo to help you with your research to find all those Obama Scandals. If Trump's Dementia wasn't at an advance stage perhaps he could lend you hand.

You know about Reagan's scandals, but know nothing of Obama's. That should tell you something, but it won't.

 

[RASTAMEN]

There are just too many.

When you have four presidents that entered office with a single civil suit against each one of them, then you have Trump with more than 70, it just doesn't seem possible. It seems like it must be fake news.

They still talk about the Clinton Foundation, but bring up the Trump Foundation and it's fake news.

And his nominees. A new basket of deplorable straight out of a swamp. They are so horrible, one after the other, when new info comes up on them, is just seems like more fake news. People just can't that bad. Or can they?

Take his Carrier deal. Many right wingers think he did an amazing thing. Then you look at the facts. It wasn't 1100 jobs saved. It was 730. And the CEO said he is going to take the millions he got from Trump and Pence and use it to automate. Meaning at least half of those will be gone. And when you explain that to the right wing, they just deny it. It can't be. It's fake news.

What happens when it's no longer fake?

Like I said. It's a train wreck. We can see it coming.

You weren't concerned about Obama's many scandals. Why the hypocrisy?

List Obama SCANDALS!!!! Remember President Obama after 8 years in office leaves office with a 60 percent approval.

His scandals are numerous and impeachable, but you likely know nothing them.

Well the Gipper is 6ft under. Perhaps you can dig up Ole Ronny Boo to help you with your research to find all those Obama Scandals. If Trump's Dementia wasn't at an advance stage perhaps he could lend you hand.

You know about Reagan's scandals, but know nothing of Obama's. That should tell you something, but it won't.

I see Dementia is a conservative trait. I look forward to Trump slobbering around and getting impeached!

 

[ding]

You weren't concerned about Obama's many scandals. Why the hypocrisy?

List Obama SCANDALS!!!! Remember President Obama after 8 years in office leaves office with a 60 percent approval.

His scandals are numerous and impeachable, but you likely know nothing them.

Well the Gipper is 6ft under. Perhaps you can dig up Ole Ronny Boo to help you with your research to find all those Obama Scandals. If Trump's Dementia wasn't at an advance stage perhaps he could lend you hand.

You know about Reagan's scandals, but know nothing of Obama's. That should tell you something, but it won't.

I see Dementia is a conservative trait. I look forward to Trump slobbering around and getting impeached!

That's because you have nothing else to look forward to. You may wish it will be something else, but it will be what it will be despite your wishes.

 

[RASTAMEN]

List Obama SCANDALS!!!! Remember President Obama after 8 years in office leaves office with a 60 percent approval.

His scandals are numerous and impeachable, but you likely know nothing them.

Well the Gipper is 6ft under. Perhaps you can dig up Ole Ronny Boo to help you with your research to find all those Obama Scandals. If Trump's Dementia wasn't at an advance stage perhaps he could lend you hand.

You know about Reagan's scandals, but know nothing of Obama's. That should tell you something, but it won't.

I see Dementia is a conservative trait. I look forward to Trump slobbering around and getting impeached!

That's because you have nothing else to look forward to. You may wish it will be something else, but it will be what it will be despite your wishes.

Impeach Trump!!!!!

 

[ding]

His scandals are numerous and impeachable, but you likely know nothing them.

Well the Gipper is 6ft under. Perhaps you can dig up Ole Ronny Boo to help you with your research to find all those Obama Scandals. If Trump's Dementia wasn't at an advance stage perhaps he could lend you hand.

You know about Reagan's scandals, but know nothing of Obama's. That should tell you something, but it won't.

I see Dementia is a conservative trait. I look forward to Trump slobbering around and getting impeached!

That's because you have nothing else to look forward to. You may wish it will be something else, but it will be what it will be despite your wishes.

Impeach Trump!!!!!

Good luck with that. You want Pence that bad, lol?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

His scandals are numerous and impeachable, but you likely know nothing them.

Well the Gipper is 6ft under. Perhaps you can dig up Ole Ronny Boo to help you with your research to find all those Obama Scandals. If Trump's Dementia wasn't at an advance stage perhaps he could lend you hand.

You know about Reagan's scandals, but know nothing of Obama's. That should tell you something, but it won't.

I see Dementia is a conservative trait. I look forward to Trump slobbering around and getting impeached!

That's because you have nothing else to look forward to. You may wish it will be something else, but it will be what it will be despite your wishes.

Impeach Trump!!!!!

Yeah, that's what a Republican Congress would do; get rid of one of their own.

 

[danielpalos]

i am accountable to my stockholders; not everybody.

You are accountable for everything you do.

good thing i don't resort to fallacy. what would, St. Pete, say.

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

socialism provides for social justice, not capital justice; Only capitalism, does that.

 

[danielpalos]

Outcomes.

good thing i don't resort to fallacy. what would, St. Pete, say.

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

Moral values are subjective. Why do you believe they aren't?

Outcomes

outcomes can also be subjective, just ask the fantastical, right wing.

 

[ding]

Outcomes.

He would say understand the difference between justice and mercy.

irrelevant; i know i merely need social justice, not social mercy.

Don't be silly. Of course being accountable for everything you do is relevant. How can it not be relevant? So is understanding the difference between justice and mercy. Justice is served when the accountable party is held accountable for his actions. Mercy is seeing it in its most favorable light. Together, all three, accountability, justice and mercy, act to establish order and harmony in a people.

Socialism is morally relative, as such there can be no such thing as social justice, it really means social preferences. As for social mercy? There is no such thing. There is no distinction in socialism between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. So there can be no mercy or justice in socialism.

Moral values are subjective. Why do you believe they aren't?

Outcomes

outcomes can also be subjective, just ask the fantastical, right wing.

No, outcomes are definitive.