Why was it OK to bomb Libya but not Iran?

[2aguy]

1. Iran would be a far bigger war and it could fight back.
2. Iran isn't bombing, killing and slaughtering its people.

We'd wipe the floor with iran.
It'd be over militarily in two or three weeks. And in Iran you actually have a populace that wants to westernize.
Go in surgically and it would be over politically in two or tree weeks as well.

Nah...they're just supporting and arming terrorist all the while screaming death to America. And obammy is giving them the bomb...

We wouldn't even have to do that...we have military forces on both of Iran's borders, we could easily begin sending in weapons and training their dissidents to fight the mullahs....

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why didn't Bush invade Iran?

They hadn't violated a ceasefire agreement like sadaam had and they didn't have the training camps that trained the 9/11 murderers...had they done that...we would have invaded them too.....

North Korea has a history of violating ceasefire agreements.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Has our feckless leader's policy "evolved" or is he just a bully who picks on those who can't fight back?

Are you suggesting that the US should start "picking fights" with countries our own size?

The situations in Libya and Iran are not the slightest bit comparable.

You really think that Iran has the ability to stand up to us?

They don't....but you have to have the will to fight....and Europe and obama don't have that will......

Enlist then.

 

[2aguy]

Has our feckless leader's policy "evolved" or is he just a bully who picks on those who can't fight back?

you know what is so fascinating about that war?

Only one sub of ours , a Ohio class, launched 90 tomahak missiles out of 126 and single handedlee destroyed Libya"s radar defense system

I thought all our ships launched tomahak missile's

But it was only one sub..

And another point...Britain ran out of missiles......we had to carry out those strikes......Europe is just waiting to be gobbled up by putin or the next Russian monster......

 

[2aguy]

Why didn't Bush invade Iran?

They hadn't violated a ceasefire agreement like sadaam had and they didn't have the training camps that trained the 9/11 murderers...had they done that...we would have invaded them too.....

North Korea has a history of violating ceasefire agreements.

Not to the point we have to invade.....had 19 North Koreans dropped those buildings things would be different....and those nukes would very well make the difference...since they could threaten to drop one on Japan or South Korea...that is why obama wants Iran to have the nuke and ballistic missiles......

 

[2aguy]

Has our feckless leader's policy "evolved" or is he just a bully who picks on those who can't fight back?

Are you suggesting that the US should start "picking fights" with countries our own size?

The situations in Libya and Iran are not the slightest bit comparable.

You really think that Iran has the ability to stand up to us?

They don't....but you have to have the will to fight....and Europe and obama don't have that will......

Enlist then.

Already did.....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

1. Iran would be a far bigger war and it could fight back.
2. Iran isn't bombing, killing and slaughtering its people.

We'd wipe the floor with iran.
It'd be over militarily in two or three weeks. And in Iran you actually have a populace that wants to westernize.
Go in surgically and it would be over politically in two or tree weeks as well.

Nah...they're just supporting and arming terrorist all the while screaming death to America. And obammy is giving them the bomb...

We wouldn't even have to do that...we have military forces on both of Iran's borders, we could easily begin sending in weapons and training their dissidents to fight the mullahs....

Yep...even with the U.S.'s constant failure to follow through they would still get takers to over throw the mullahs.
In my mind it's the best way to safe Iran. Assuming we dont bail.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

1. Iran would be a far bigger war and it could fight back.
2. Iran isn't bombing, killing and slaughtering its people.

We'd wipe the floor with iran.
It'd be over militarily in two or three weeks. And in Iran you actually have a populace that wants to westernize.
Go in surgically and it would be over politically in two or tree weeks as well.

Nah...they're just supporting and arming terrorist all the while screaming death to America. And obammy is giving them the bomb...

We wouldn't even have to do that...we have military forces on both of Iran's borders, we could easily begin sending in weapons and training their dissidents to fight the mullahs....

Iran has more than 2 borders. Which of those neighboring countries are you suggesting that we invade in order to put troops there?

 

[2aguy]

1. Iran would be a far bigger war and it could fight back.
2. Iran isn't bombing, killing and slaughtering its people.

We'd wipe the floor with iran.
It'd be over militarily in two or three weeks. And in Iran you actually have a populace that wants to westernize.
Go in surgically and it would be over politically in two or tree weeks as well.

Nah...they're just supporting and arming terrorist all the while screaming death to America. And obammy is giving them the bomb...

We wouldn't even have to do that...we have military forces on both of Iran's borders, we could easily begin sending in weapons and training their dissidents to fight the mullahs....

Iran has more than 2 borders. Which of those neighboring countries are you suggesting that we invade in order to put troops there?

We were already in Iraq and Afghanistan........until obama pulled us out and gave it over to isis....

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Has our feckless leader's policy "evolved" or is he just a bully who picks on those who can't fight back?

Are you suggesting that the US should start "picking fights" with countries our own size?

The situations in Libya and Iran are not the slightest bit comparable.

Correct. Libya was no threat. Iran was & continues to be. Just ask any US military personnel who lost their limbs.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

1. Iran would be a far bigger war and it could fight back.
2. Iran isn't bombing, killing and slaughtering its people.

We'd wipe the floor with iran.
It'd be over militarily in two or three weeks. And in Iran you actually have a populace that wants to westernize.
Go in surgically and it would be over politically in two or tree weeks as well.

Nah...they're just supporting and arming terrorist all the while screaming death to America. And obammy is giving them the bomb...

We wouldn't even have to do that...we have military forces on both of Iran's borders, we could easily begin sending in weapons and training their dissidents to fight the mullahs....

Iran has more than 2 borders. Which of those neighboring countries are you suggesting that we invade in order to put troops there?

We were already in Iraq and Afghanistan........until obama pulled us out and gave it over to isis....

So you think we should re-invade Afghanistan and Iraq in order to prepare an invasion of Iran?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

1. Iran would be a far bigger war and it could fight back.
2. Iran isn't bombing, killing and slaughtering its people.

We'd wipe the floor with iran.
It'd be over militarily in two or three weeks. And in Iran you actually have a populace that wants to westernize.
Go in surgically and it would be over politically in two or tree weeks as well.

Nah...they're just supporting and arming terrorist all the while screaming death to America. And obammy is giving them the bomb...

We wouldn't even have to do that...we have military forces on both of Iran's borders, we could easily begin sending in weapons and training their dissidents to fight the mullahs....

Iran has more than 2 borders. Which of those neighboring countries are you suggesting that we invade in order to put troops there?

We could send carrier groups and pound them into submission without ever putting a boot on the ground. Followed up by a 'peace keeping force' to make sure the mullah loyalist dont act the fool.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

1. Iran would be a far bigger war and it could fight back.
2. Iran isn't bombing, killing and slaughtering its people.

We'd wipe the floor with iran.
It'd be over militarily in two or three weeks. And in Iran you actually have a populace that wants to westernize.
Go in surgically and it would be over politically in two or tree weeks as well.

Nah...they're just supporting and arming terrorist all the while screaming death to America. And obammy is giving them the bomb...

We wouldn't even have to do that...we have military forces on both of Iran's borders, we could easily begin sending in weapons and training their dissidents to fight the mullahs....

Iran has more than 2 borders. Which of those neighboring countries are you suggesting that we invade in order to put troops there?

We could send carrier groups and pound them into submission without ever putting a boot on the ground. Followed up by a 'peace keeping force' to make sure the mullah loyalist dont act the fool.

I was asking the other armchair general.

 

[TooTall]

Has our feckless leader's policy "evolved" or is he just a bully who picks on those who can't fight back?

Why didn't Bush invade North Korea?

Why hasn't Obama invaded North Korea?

 

[2aguy]

1. Iran would be a far bigger war and it could fight back.
2. Iran isn't bombing, killing and slaughtering its people.

We'd wipe the floor with iran.
It'd be over militarily in two or three weeks. And in Iran you actually have a populace that wants to westernize.
Go in surgically and it would be over politically in two or tree weeks as well.

Nah...they're just supporting and arming terrorist all the while screaming death to America. And obammy is giving them the bomb...

We wouldn't even have to do that...we have military forces on both of Iran's borders, we could easily begin sending in weapons and training their dissidents to fight the mullahs....

Iran has more than 2 borders. Which of those neighboring countries are you suggesting that we invade in order to put troops there?

We were already in Iraq and Afghanistan........until obama pulled us out and gave it over to isis....

So you think we should re-invade Afghanistan and Iraq in order to prepare an invasion of Iran?

To keep them from getting the most destructive weapon ever created...yeah.....we should....just like Europe should have stopped hitler long before Poland...no one listened then, they aren't listening now.....

 

[2aguy]

Has our feckless leader's policy "evolved" or is he just a bully who picks on those who can't fight back?

Why didn't Bush invade North Korea?

Why hasn't Obama invaded North Korea?

He likes the style of government in North Korea, that's why.....

 

[KissMy]

Iran would be bombed, but not by Obama, to prevent them from developing a nuclear weapon.

Bombing Iran will not stop them from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran's nuclear facilities are built deep inside of mountains. A full scale invasion 3 times the size of that used in Iraq will be needed. Iraq cost US $4.4 Trillion. We won the cold war by bankrupting Russia the same way. Once we get bogged down in a huge war like that, our country will be open to attacks from all our enemies. Life as you know it will end.

 

[2aguy]

Iran would be bombed, but not by Obama, to prevent them from developing a nuclear weapon.

Bombing Iran will not stop them from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran's nuclear facilities are built deep inside of mountains. A full scale invasion 3 times the size of that used in Iraq will be needed. Iraq cost US $4.4 Trillion. We won the cold war by bankrupting Russia the same way. Once we get bogged down in a huge war like that, our country will be open to attacks from all our enemies. Life as you know it will end.

Which is why we should increase the sanctions, arm and train their opposition groups and let them deal with a well armed, well trained and funded resistance........pay them back for the killers they sent to Iraq and Afghanistan....

 

[KissMy]

Iran would be bombed, but not by Obama, to prevent them from developing a nuclear weapon.

Bombing Iran will not stop them from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran's nuclear facilities are built deep inside of mountains. A full scale invasion 3 times the size of that used in Iraq will be needed. Iraq cost US $4.4 Trillion. We won the cold war by bankrupting Russia the same way. Once we get bogged down in a huge war like that, our country will be open to attacks from all our enemies. Life as you know it will end.

Which is why we should increase the sanctions, arm and train their opposition groups and let them deal with a well armed, well trained and funded resistance........pay them back for the killers they sent to Iraq and Afghanistan....

ISIS is Iran's enemy. We already trained, armed & funded them.

 

[2aguy]

Iran would be bombed, but not by Obama, to prevent them from developing a nuclear weapon.

Bombing Iran will not stop them from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran's nuclear facilities are built deep inside of mountains. A full scale invasion 3 times the size of that used in Iraq will be needed. Iraq cost US $4.4 Trillion. We won the cold war by bankrupting Russia the same way. Once we get bogged down in a huge war like that, our country will be open to attacks from all our enemies. Life as you know it will end.

Which is why we should increase the sanctions, arm and train their opposition groups and let them deal with a well armed, well trained and funded resistance........pay them back for the killers they sent to Iraq and Afghanistan....

ISIS is Iran's enemy. We already trained, armed & funded them.

Now they want to fund Iran with billions.......and give them nukes....