Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are just a dumb SUCKER who thinks they are smarter than everybody else, side irrelevant.I was in the business for nearly 20 years, I know precisely how the game is played, and I'm still involved on the periphery.Yeah I read your failed attempt to blame both sides, again if there was so much bias in the media, the Right would not have to fabricate it so SUCKERS like you would think it was equal on both sides.What in the world are you talking about?Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!So you don't "see" bias in the media, and I'm the sucker.The real "problem" is SUCKERS like you didn't catch the change the OP made to CREATE the so called "bias."
Okay, I believe you.
.
Did you actually read my post, or did you just go full drama queen immediately when you realized it wasn't in simplistic lockstep with your ideology?
Yikes.
.
You think you are so even-handed, but you are nothing more than a first class SUCKER.
You are just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Side irrelevant.
Since you're unable to control yourself, please melt down for someone else, thanks.
.
Yes, got it, thanks so much. You're just too smart for me.You are just a dumb SUCKER who thinks they are smarter than everybody else, side irrelevant.I was in the business for nearly 20 years, I know precisely how the game is played, and I'm still involved on the periphery.Yeah I read your failed attempt to blame both sides, again if there was so much bias in the media, the Right would not have to fabricate it so SUCKERS like you would think it was equal on both sides.What in the world are you talking about?Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!So you don't "see" bias in the media, and I'm the sucker.
Okay, I believe you.
.
Did you actually read my post, or did you just go full drama queen immediately when you realized it wasn't in simplistic lockstep with your ideology?
Yikes.
.
You think you are so even-handed, but you are nothing more than a first class SUCKER.
You are just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Side irrelevant.
Since you're unable to control yourself, please melt down for someone else, thanks.
.
Again, if there was so much REAL bias, the Right would not have to fabricate it!!!
Get it????
Then you should be aware of the FACT that the only honest and objective reporting available to the American public is through blogs and small news dedicated organizations like OAN, right?I was in the business for nearly 20 years, I know precisely how the game is played, and I'm still involved on the periphery.
.
Ed is the smartest man in the world....in his own estimation.Yes, got it, thanks so much. You're just too smart for me.You are just a dumb SUCKER who thinks they are smarter than everybody else, side irrelevant.
.
Notice how the worthless lying scum America-hating Right ALWAYS change the words when they "quote" the Americans they have been programed to hate!!!!!
Well, I did catch the OP changing the headline, and you didn't, so at the very least I am more observant than you.Yes, got it, thanks so much. You're just too smart for me.You are just a dumb SUCKER who thinks they are smarter than everybody else, side irrelevant.I was in the business for nearly 20 years, I know precisely how the game is played, and I'm still involved on the periphery.Yeah I read your failed attempt to blame both sides, again if there was so much bias in the media, the Right would not have to fabricate it so SUCKERS like you would think it was equal on both sides.What in the world are you talking about?Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!
Did you actually read my post, or did you just go full drama queen immediately when you realized it wasn't in simplistic lockstep with your ideology?
Yikes.
.
You think you are so even-handed, but you are nothing more than a first class SUCKER.
You are just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Side irrelevant.
Since you're unable to control yourself, please melt down for someone else, thanks.
.
Again, if there was so much REAL bias, the Right would not have to fabricate it!!!
Get it????
.
The real "problem" is SUCKERS like you didn't catch the change the OP made to CREATE the so called "bias."The problem here is that our media's abject inability to hide or control its biases is, in effect, giving more exposure and credibility to other sources with the same abject inability.
This ain't good, kids. If we really value country over party, we can't allow this to continue at this pace.
. Well they who are on the left figure that they are the ultimate intellectual scholarly lawyers in a room always, and they are trying to use some sort of Watergate precedent up against the Trump case, and even if it doesn't apply, then they will attempt to make it apply one way or the other.Do you know libs still think Watergate was a big deal?
That is how pathetic and hypocritical the MSM is.
There's no way to verify the accuracy or objectivity of a blog. Any winger nut can write something online. I'm not familiar with OAN, but I simply don't believe any media source out-of-hand.Then you should be aware of the FACT that the only honest and objective reporting available to the American public is through blogs and small news dedicated organizations like OAN, right?I was in the business for nearly 20 years, I know precisely how the game is played, and I'm still involved on the periphery.
Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!So you don't "see" bias in the media, and I'm the sucker.The real "problem" is SUCKERS like you didn't catch the change the OP made to CREATE the so called "bias."The problem here is that our media's abject inability to hide or control its biases is, in effect, giving more exposure and credibility to other sources with the same abject inability. This ain't good, kids. If we really value country over party, we can't allow this to continue at this pace.
Okay, I believe you.
.
Perfect example of lying and deflection. Note I never said the OP was a saint or anything else. But you are a liar.The OP altered the headline to attach the media and that make ME the liar and the OP a saint.In face of all the proof that the liberal media is lying, you post a clear cut lie. You are evil.Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!So you don't "see" bias in the media, and I'm the sucker.The real "problem" is SUCKERS like you didn't catch the change the OP made to CREATE the so called "bias."The problem here is that our media's abject inability to hide or control its biases is, in effect, giving more exposure and credibility to other sources with the same abject inability. This ain't good, kids. If we really value country over party, we can't allow this to continue at this pace.
Okay, I believe you.
.
Right-wing "logic" is mind boggling!!!
You said I was an evil liar for pointing out how the OP altered the headline, which he undeniably did, so that implies the OP is an honest saint to you compared to the me, which is your deflection from having to admit the dishonesty of your fellow traveler, the OP..Perfect example of lying and deflection. Note I never said the OP was a saint or anything else. But you are a liar.The OP altered the headline to attach the media and that make ME the liar and the OP a saint.In face of all the proof that the liberal media is lying, you post a clear cut lie. You are evil.Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!So you don't "see" bias in the media, and I'm the sucker.The real "problem" is SUCKERS like you didn't catch the change the OP made to CREATE the so called "bias."
Okay, I believe you.
.
Right-wing "logic" is mind boggling!!!
You are just a dumb SUCKER who thinks they are smarter than everybody else, side irrelevant.I was in the business for nearly 20 years, I know precisely how the game is played, and I'm still involved on the periphery.Yeah I read your failed attempt to blame both sides, again if there was so much bias in the media, the Right would not have to fabricate it so SUCKERS like you would think it was equal on both sides.What in the world are you talking about?Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!So you don't "see" bias in the media, and I'm the sucker.
Okay, I believe you.
.
Did you actually read my post, or did you just go full drama queen immediately when you realized it wasn't in simplistic lockstep with your ideology?
Yikes.
.
You think you are so even-handed, but you are nothing more than a first class SUCKER.
You are just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Side irrelevant.
Since you're unable to control yourself, please melt down for someone else, thanks.
.
Again, if there was so much REAL bias, the Right would not have to fabricate it!!!
Get it????
Notice how the worthless lying scum America-hating Right ALWAYS change the words when they "quote" the Americans they have been programed to hate!!!!!
Well, I did catch the OP changing the headline, and you didn't, so at the very least I am more observant than you.Yes, got it, thanks so much. You're just too smart for me.You are just a dumb SUCKER who thinks they are smarter than everybody else, side irrelevant.I was in the business for nearly 20 years, I know precisely how the game is played, and I'm still involved on the periphery.Yeah I read your failed attempt to blame both sides, again if there was so much bias in the media, the Right would not have to fabricate it so SUCKERS like you would think it was equal on both sides.What in the world are you talking about?
Did you actually read my post, or did you just go full drama queen immediately when you realized it wasn't in simplistic lockstep with your ideology?
Yikes.
.
You think you are so even-handed, but you are nothing more than a first class SUCKER.
You are just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Side irrelevant.
Since you're unable to control yourself, please melt down for someone else, thanks.
.
Again, if there was so much REAL bias, the Right would not have to fabricate it!!!
Get it????
.
No I didn't. Try to stop lying. I said you were evil for refusing to believe the MSM is lying a and twisting when the daily proof is there! CNN is even printing retractions! And you don't believe they are lying and twisting then that makes you evil. Spin more monster, no one believes any of you,You said I was an evil liar for pointing out how the OP altered the headline, which he undeniably did, so that implies the OP is an honest saint to you compared to the me, which is your deflection from having to admit the dishonesty of your fellow traveler, the OP..Perfect example of lying and deflection. Note I never said the OP was a saint or anything else. But you are a liar.The OP altered the headline to attach the media and that make ME the liar and the OP a saint.In face of all the proof that the liberal media is lying, you post a clear cut lie. You are evil.Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!So you don't "see" bias in the media, and I'm the sucker.
Okay, I believe you.
.
Right-wing "logic" is mind boggling!!!
You said I was an evil liar for pointing out how the OP altered the headline, which he undeniably did, so that implies the OP is an honest saint to you compared to the me, which is your deflection from having to admit the dishonesty of your fellow traveler, the OP..Perfect example of lying and deflection. Note I never said the OP was a saint or anything else. But you are a liar.The OP altered the headline to attach the media and that make ME the liar and the OP a saint.In face of all the proof that the liberal media is lying, you post a clear cut lie. You are evil.Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!So you don't "see" bias in the media, and I'm the sucker.
Okay, I believe you.
.
Right-wing "logic" is mind boggling!!!
No, to pathological liars on the Right it says Trump watches TV 8 hours a day, but to honest people it says what it actually says, UP TO 8 hours a day, which clearly means an occasional maximum of 8 hours, especially when the article clearly says he watched TV 4 hours a day, establishing that 4 is the norm and 8 is the max.The HEAD LINE SAID watches UP to 8 hours per DAY! To any person reading that headline it says Trump watches TV 8 hours a day!
And now the dumb act to pretend you are too stupid to know what you did.Well, I did catch the OP changing the headline, and you didn't, so at the very least I am more observant than you.Yes, got it, thanks so much. You're just too smart for me.You are just a dumb SUCKER who thinks they are smarter than everybody else, side irrelevant.I was in the business for nearly 20 years, I know precisely how the game is played, and I'm still involved on the periphery.Yeah I read your failed attempt to blame both sides, again if there was so much bias in the media, the Right would not have to fabricate it so SUCKERS like you would think it was equal on both sides.
You think you are so even-handed, but you are nothing more than a first class SUCKER.
You are just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Side irrelevant.
Since you're unable to control yourself, please melt down for someone else, thanks.
.
Again, if there was so much REAL bias, the Right would not have to fabricate it!!!
Get it????
.
Where did I change ANY headline?
The Headline clearly stated Trump WATCHES up to 8 hours a DAY PER DAY!
How did you catch anything? Then one line later it says at LEAST 4 hours watching television! That's a far cry from UP TO EIGHT HOURS PER DAY!
View attachment 165235
Another one playing dumb.No I didn't. Try to stop lying. I said you were evil for refusing to believe the MSM is lying a and twisting when the daily proof is there! CNN is even printing retractions! And you don't believe they are lying and twisting then that makes you evil. Spin more monster, no one believes any of you,You said I was an evil liar for pointing out how the OP altered the headline, which he undeniably did, so that implies the OP is an honest saint to you compared to the me, which is your deflection from having to admit the dishonesty of your fellow traveler, the OP..Perfect example of lying and deflection. Note I never said the OP was a saint or anything else. But you are a liar.The OP altered the headline to attach the media and that make ME the liar and the OP a saint.In face of all the proof that the liberal media is lying, you post a clear cut lie. You are evil.Whatever "bias" is in the media was NOT in the OP's headline, so obviously there is a lot LESS bias than you dishonest suckers have been led to believe or the Right would not have to stoop to creating it!!!!!
Right-wing "logic" is mind boggling!!!
