Will ANYONE in the government be held accountable for violations of the first amendment via Twitter?

[Faun]

Says the hypocritical poster who has a picture of Trump behind bars.

You really cant make this shit up

Oh? What's hypocritical about it?

 

[Dragonlady]

Says the hypocritical poster who has a picture of Trump behind bars.

You really cant make this shit up

Anyone who is legitimately an American patriot, wants to see Donald Trump behind bars.

 

[bripat9643]

You're insane, fucking moron. If you had proof , you'd post it. Simple as that.

For anything to meet your definition of "proof" is categorically impossible. Even a conviction doesn't constitute proof in your mind.

 

[bripat9643]

Anyone who is legitimately an American patriot, wants to see Donald Trump behind bars.

That's what only psychotic Marxists want.

 

[Faun]

you are correct...he said peacefully have your voices heard at the steps of the capitol. How inciting!

Unlike...I dont know....crying Chuck who set "you set off a whirlwind Gorsuch and Cavanaugh....

And...Oh Yeah....waters who said Get in their faces in a gasoline station.....who the hell still calls it a gasoline station anyway?

Or how about Michelle....when they go low we kick them.

And, of course, the classic....the police acted stupidly....fucking dumbass Obama.

But Trump used the word peacefully and morons like you claim that was "code" for riot.

Dumbass morons...the whole lot of you.

Or how about Michelle....when they go low we kick them.

Jeez, goober, you can't get anything right, can ya?


.

 

[Faun]

For anything to meet your definition of "proof" is categorically impossible. Even a conviction doesn't constitute proof in your mind.

Fucking moron, if you had proof, you post it. Instead, you whimper a lame excuse for why you don't post the proof you don't actually have.

 

[bripat9643]

Fucking moron, if you had proof, you post it. Instead, you whimper a lame excuse for why you don't post the proof you don't actually have.

I don't waste my time doing your homework assignments, jackass. Like I said, for anything to meet your definition of "proof" is categorically impossible.

Why dont you stick it where the sun don't shine?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Twitter is private. The government doesn't own it.

Then Mr Musk can do as he pleases. Right?

That's what you loons screeched when that asshole Dorsey ran it

 

[Redfish]

Twitter is a privately-owned company. It's not the government. This isn't a First Amendment issue.

Should a company -- especially a company that deals in freedom of expression -- fuck around with banning and shadow-banning and playing games? No, not in my estimation. Those are only band aids, and band aids usually make things worse. We just refuse to learn that one.

But this ain't a First Amendment issue.

hmmm, can you write to your local newspaper and have your opinions printed? is the newspaper a privately owned company? How about your TV station if they interview you and air the interview? Of course censorship by twitter and facebook are first amendment issues. Freedom of speech does not end at the entrance to a private corporation.

 

[Redfish]

Then Mr Musk can do as he pleases. Right?

That's what you loons screeched when that asshole Dorsey ran it

So if Musk blocked all left wing comments that would be OK with you? it works both ways, asshole. comment not meant for you sassy, sorry.

 

[scruffy]

Is there a point to anything you post, other than to attack other posters.

Yes, you stupid leftard sack of fecal matter, but it always flies right over your pointy little head.

 

[Dragonlady]

That's what only psychotic Marxists want.

How would you know what a psychotic Marxist wants. How many of them do you know?

Every honest person who doesn't lie or cheat people in their everyday life, wants Donald Trump jailed as an example to others. Republicans keep getting themselves arrested. They really do think that the laws don't apply to them. Especially rich assholes like Trump.

 

[Faun]

I don't waste my time doing your homework assignments, jackass. Like I said, for anything to meet your definition of "proof" is categorically impossible.

Why dont you stick it where the sun don't shine?

LOLOL

You fucking moron, proving YOUR claims is YOUR job, not mine.

As I already eloquently pointed out -- you would if you could. You can't, so you make up pathetically lame excuses for why you don't.

 

[Dragonlady]

Furthermore, the fact that the Supreme court cam to a decision doesn't mean all conservatives agree with the decision.

You won't accept it as proof unless every ballot is given a court ordered examination by forensic specialist, and you won't allow that unless you have proof of fraud.

It's the classic FUAX catch 22.

The Supreme Court unanimously agreed that Trump had no basis for an Appeal.

 

[OKTexas]

Twitter is a privately-owned company. It's not the government. This isn't a First Amendment issue.

Should a company -- especially a company that deals in freedom of expression -- fuck around with banning and shadow-banning and playing games? No, not in my estimation. Those are only band aids, and band aids usually make things worse. We just refuse to learn that one.

But this ain't a First Amendment issue.

You're a fucking idiot. The government can't enlist companies/third parties to do things it is constitutionally prohibited from doing. You're a poor liar and even a poorer propagandist.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Twitter is private. The government doesn't own it.

Doesn't mean they weren't willing accomplices to government censorship. How would you like the feds to tell a "private" security company is would be nice if they searched your home, because the feds didn't have enough for a warrant. Would you throw your hands up in the air as they kick in your door, and say, nothing I can do, after all it's "private" company? You're a fucking moron that buys into anything the commies feed ya. Must be tough not to be able to think for yourself.

.

 

[toobfreak]

I see the first two responses are from idiots who can't grasp the idea that the government is BANNED from interfering in the free speech of its citizens yet went out of its way to do that very thing by putting pressure on Twitter and most likely every other social media site

Exactly well-stated. I know this doesn't sit well with the neo-Marxists, but the US government is Constitutionally barred from obstructing the reasonable free-speech of the citizens. That does not allow it to coax, encourage, endorse, influence, conjoin with, exploit, entice, finance, bribe nor extort another actor, private business or subcontractor outside of government to perpetrate the crime of a civil rights violation for them, to their benefit, as an actor thereof, or otherwise to their satisfaction.

 

[OKTexas]

Read the First Amendment.

Or don't. I don't care.

Read court cases on governments using third parties to do shit they can't legally do. Or don't, you can remain an ignorant ass for all I care. At least you're entertaining.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Yet, the actions occurred by private employees, not govt. employees.

You got anything relevant to say?

.

 

[OKTexas]

The conservative Supreme Court decided that a conviction should stand even when significant exculpatory evidence was withheld because we shouldn’t be second guessing the finality of convictions.

So there goes the right to a fair trial. Conservatives said nothing. Their justices are responsible for this travesty. Our rights are being trampled.

SCOTUS Refused to Take Up Case on 'Suppressed Exculpatory Evidence' About 'Key Witness' in Capital Case, and Justice Jackson Had Some Thoughts

Justice Jackson expressed concern about the prosecution's "key witness" in a 1989 capital murder case.

lawandcrime.com

Has nothing to do with the topic in the OP.

.