Will ANYONE in the government be held accountable for violations of the first amendment via Twitter?

Will anyone be held to account for the government violating the first amendment rights of citizens?

  • Yes

  • No

  • There were no first amendment violations


Results are only viewable after voting.
Folks like you who can't prove widespread fraud.
We will the minute we get a hearing on the subject. Turds like you keep saying we can't have a hearing about fraud unless we have already proven it. What's the point of the hearing if it has already been proven? You catch-22 arguments only fool the gullible.
 
The conservative Supreme Court decided that a conviction should stand even when significant exculpatory evidence was withheld because we shouldn’t be second guessing the finality of convictions.

So there goes the right to a fair trial. Conservatives said nothing. Their justices are responsible for this travesty. Our rights are being trampled.

The right to a fair trial does not mean the right to an infallible result. How much evidence is required to overturn a verdict is another issue altogether. You certainly haven't established that. You just assumed it.

Furthermore, the fact that the Supreme court came to a decision doesn't mean all conservatives agree with that decision.
 
As I have said in this thread--yes, but Twitter "colluded" with the govt to shut down speech.

And we are about to find out what went down with Covid...
There's too much already to ignore: RFK Jr.'s The Real Anthony Fauci, forthcoming The Wuhan Cover-Up, and Huff's The Truth About Wuhan, let alone all of the Twitter members: Quay, Ebright, McCullough, Malone, The Jikky, Florin_Uncovers, stevenemassey, thackerpd, tony_vandongen, VBruttel, CharlesRixey, BillyBostickson, Ayjchan, profnfenton, BiophysicsFl, breakfast_dogs, KeithEv84928885, FoolsMultiply, WashburneAlex, KevinMcKernan, etc.
 
We will the minute we get a hearing on the subject. Turds like you keep saying we can't have a hearing about fraud unless we have already proven it. What's the point of the hearing if it has already been proven? You catch-22 arguments only fool the gullible.

You don't need a hearing to prove it here.

That's just the lame excuse of a fucking moron who knows he can't prove it.
 
WIKI is meaningless.

You idiots keep pointing to Twitter being a private entity but this isn't about Twitter. This is about the government boot being applied to Twitter in the hopes of removing speech that was already exercised. AKA infringement
What boot? What were the threats?
 
The right to a fair trial does not mean the right to an infallible result. How much evidence is required to overturn a verdict is another issue altogether. You certainly haven't established that. You just assumed it.

Furthermore, the fact that the Supreme court cam to a decision doesn't mean all conservatives agree with the decision.
You don't need a hearing to prove it here.

That's just the lame excuse of a fucking moron who knows he can't prove it.
You won't accept it as proof unless every ballot is given a court ordered examination by forensic specialist, and you won't allow that unless you have proof of fraud.

It's the classic FUAX catch 22.
 
Furthermore, the fact that the Supreme court cam to a decision doesn't mean all conservatives agree with the decision.

You won't accept it as proof unless every ballot is given a court ordered examination by forensic specialist, and you won't allow that unless you have proof of fraud.

It's the classic FUAX catch 22.

Nope, you have no proof. How many times are you going to repeat it? Had you actually had proof, you'd post it and you wouldn't care what I thought.
 
There are no first amendment rights for people dealing with a privately owned media platform. The first amendment only protects you from prosecution by the government for criticizing the government.
You stupid twit, the First doesn't protect you from ANYTHING.

God damn you leftards are stupid.

Do us a favor, stay in Canada. Don't come down here
 
You stupid twit, the First doesn't protect you from ANYTHING.

God damn you leftards are stupid.

Do us a favor, stay in Canada. Don't come down here

Is there a point to anything you post, other than to attack other posters.

Do yourself a favour and take a civics class.
 
Pretty easy to see what the talking points are, yes we suppressed free speech, pressured Twitter to do so but no there is nothing you can do about it. We only like our free speech, and that which supports our lies.
 
Doesn't count just because you say there's fraud when you're utterly incapable of proving it. No one cares about your rightarded hallucinations.
Says the hypocritical poster who has a picture of Trump behind bars.

You really cant make this shit up
 
Yeah, Trump never said a word,,,,,not.
you are correct...he said peacefully have your voices heard at the steps of the capitol. How inciting!

Unlike...I dont know....crying Chuck who set "you set off a whirlwind Gorsuch and Cavanaugh....

And...Oh Yeah....waters who said Get in their faces in a gasoline station.....who the hell still calls it a gasoline station anyway?

Or how about Michelle....when they go low we kick them.

And, of course, the classic....the police acted stupidly....fucking dumbass Obama.

But Trump used the word peacefully and morons like you claim that was "code" for riot.

Dumbass morons...the whole lot of you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top