Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To anyone but the most partisan it is clear that first amendment violations are abundant but will ANYONE be held to account for it?
If not our so called constitutional rights are nothing but a figment of our imagination IMO.
Congress enacted a false currency. congress enacted the federal income tax. Congress enacted the 17th amendment.Please see post 39. Or 71. Or 140.
You're just making shit up again. It's smarter to be honest and accurate. You clearly don't even know what the First Amendment says.
"Congress shall make no law...." No law was made. There could be real problems here, but no law was made. That's what it says.
But don't worry -- I'm not expecting honesty or accuracy from you. Only hyper-partisanship and middle school-level insults.
Is there a point here?Congress enacted a false currency. congress enacted the federal income tax. Congress enacted the 17th amendment.
Please see post 39. Or 71. Or 140.
You're just making shit up again. It's smarter to be honest and accurate. You clearly don't even know what the First Amendment says.
"Congress shall make no law...." No law was made. There could be real problems here, but no law was made. That's what it says.
But don't worry -- I'm not expecting honesty or accuracy from you. Only hyper-partisanship and middle school-level insults.
I don't have a Twitter account , Moron.Read the twitter files, dumbass.
From irrelevant WIKI to Trump?The majority of Americans think Trump is disgusting.. and they tend to be tolerant towards people who are a different color or faith or sexual orientation. Sponsors are keenly aware of this. They just aren't going to support religious extremists or Fascists.
Start your own social media.
Half of the department that banned accounts was comprised of EX DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS AND THEIR KIDS.It's not a First Amendment issue. That applies to the government, not a privately owned company like Twitter. And since the government didn't force Twitter to suppress anything, it means Twitter acted on their own accord.
Half of the department that banned accounts was comprised of EX DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS AND THEIR KIDS.
It was DEFINITELY collusion with the Democrats in government.
Y'all found collusion where none existed with Russia but can't see the shit that right there in front of you.
Absurd
The ones telling them WHO TO BAN are.Ex-Democrats are not the government.
I didn't, ya moron.
list an example.Yes, he has. It's second nature to Trump.
Let's see...let's try this again.Once more:
Eliminating cushy tax breaks is NOT limiting free speech
www.google.com
This is not difficult. It is really easy.
Please cite in the Constitution where any company has a right to cushy tax breaks.
OTOH can you cite where I have the right to speech free of coercion by the govt? OH YEAH!! Right in the First Amendment!!
What if they were foreign actors?If...and I say IF the FBI, DHS or the DNS persuaded Twitter to censor anyone,....be it a liberal or a conservative, the first amendment has been breached.
Why are your panties in such a bunch that Twitter would not post Hunter Biden's dick pics?I see the first two responses are from idiots who can't grasp the idea that the government is BANNED from interfering in the free speech of its citizens yet went out of its way to do that very thing by putting pressure on Twitter and most likely every other social media site
The ones telling them WHO TO BAN are.
I hope heads roll for this bullshit once the right regains control
If the government pressured Twitter to suppress the Hunter story - that seems like a pretty clear violation. Especially if it was done for political reasons, rather than public safety. I don't know the facts of what went down. If the Twitter people say they weren't coerced, that would make it pretty tough to prosecute.Twitter is a privately-owned company. It's not the government. This isn't a First Amendment issue.
Should a company -- especially a company that deals in freedom of expression -- fuck around with banning and shadow-banning and playing games? No, not in my estimation. Those are only band aids, and band aids usually make things worse. We just refuse to learn that one.
But this ain't a First Amendment issue.
Foreign actors are not the federal government.What if they were foreign actors?
So the fact that the FBI was working with social media about foreign actors means that they weren’t violating the first amendment.Foreign actors are not the federal government.
First amendment protects American Citizens from censorship by any branch of the federal government....including all agencies.
I thought you knew that.
I didn't say that. I guess you have trouble engaging in an honest debate making it not worth my time interacting with your childish behavior.So the fact that the FBI was working with social media about foreign actors means that they weren’t violating the first amendment.
Right?
Pretty pathetic.I didn't say that. I guess you have trouble engaging in an honest debate making it not worth my time interacting with your childish behavior.
Cya.
