Will Roe v Wade be overturned? We all know its headed there so what say you?

[beautress]

Murdering a separate human being, even in its starting state, it is not a body part of the mother. The Democrats want to "legislate" the fetus' life by falsely claiming it is part of its mother. You look at that small being's DNA, and it is no way its mother's replicated body. It is entirely a different person. DNA will prove it. Right now, we're losing children because of lawyering people around in a sea of lies.

You never told us….
If you believe in God and that He controls all things….
When a baby dies in utero….clearly that was God’s design.
So if God has no problem snuffing out a life….why do you?

I believe that you would blame God for something he ordered, even though he gave you a finite life in which he hoped you would become a considerate human being instead of one who wars against living humans-to-be, in spite of being an otherwise well-off, politically correct human being. And you are the last person on this planet I would trust, since you have zero respect for helpless living beings dependent on others to help him become a doctor who figured out how to rid the planet of diseases, a sanitation worker who figured out an economical way to clean up the detritus in the 7 seas thrown in by thoughtless dolts, a woman who found a simple solution for and slimmed down all the obese people on the planet to stay that way, a musician who would write a piece of work so uplifting depressed people would regain their sense of happiness for life, a biochemist who would develop a beautiful flowering plant that would clean up the skies and yield a fruit that would when eaten make a human brain wiser, a minister who would prepare people to turn away from lying, stealing, raping, hating, killing, and disrespecting of parents into loving, caring persons who would bring about heaven on this earth, and creative people who'd make this world a better place and would feel a part of the good they did, but no. We must go with the flow and support bad things for people made worse by them, like aborting one's own child, and not thinking about it until facing St. Peter and that aborted child and all his brethren at Heaven's gate, restored to the full glory they would have had in life. If we would only let them live, might be that heaven was right here all along, and since one of them would bring about no more death, we'll have to die first to find out the secrets God entrusted to those who were aborted by truly immature, disrespectful, thoughtless, and hateful beings in charge of human misery on this side whose parents did not abort them. Our job is to make life better, not worse for the unborn who will bring more answers to our kind. And that's what I think and will until God says "Your days are up. Thanks for standing up for the helpless who lost life to those gone wrong." God's blessings are better than your curses.

Thats all fine (and gibberish) but….

You still have never told us….
If you believe in God and that He controls all things….
When a baby dies in utero….clearly that was God’s design.
So if God has no problem snuffing out a life….why do you?

And if you believe that God kills babies (or at least doesn’t prevent their death)….how can you worship such a being?

Read the Proverbs and you will know why I worship God. Then read the book of Matthew. That will answer your question, but you won't like it.

Sorry to paint you into the corner showing you the hilarious ridiculousness of your own beliefs—so much so that you’ve had to cower behind “read this” and “read that” instead of answering a direct question.

But you really brought it on yourself.

So God kills a baby. You supposedly hate that.
But you worship the God that allows a baby to die.

Yep—that is your existence in a nutshell.

You can continue to deny it but it is the truth.

I'm in no corner, but you're in the loser's corner as long as you hate God, hate his people, love and support those killing the unborn, and fool yourself into thinking that bad is good and that good is bad. God is not in charge of a mother who kills her own child. He has, however, left that child at St. Peter's gate to point a finger at the evil person who tries to sneak in undetected in full patronage of others, O Madam Arrogance.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

you have no freedom from religion, it is freedom of Religion






.


.

 

[BS Filter]

The Apostle Paul killed Christian's before he saw the light. God forgives our past. You losers need to keep it alive for political reasons. That's why you're losers and going to get your nasty vile asses kicked good in the next election.

I will ask the God of my fathers to forgive you

So what is your god's name?

View attachment 261611
12:54
The Pronunciation of the name יהוה (YHWH)
Jeff A. Benner
YouTube - Apr 10, 2012
View attachment 261612
0:06
How To Pronounce YHWH
pronunciationbook
YouTube - Mar 24, 2012
View attachment 261613
1:36:00
Nehemia Gordon: How to Pronounce YHWH in Hebrew The ...

You better ask your YHWH to forgive you. He doesn't condone murder.

Over the centuries who has killed more than the Christians?

Self defense isn't murder. Idiot.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

you have no freedom from religion, it is freedom of Religion






.


.

The Bible definition of Religion is this:



James 1:27

• Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.

.

 

[beautress]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

 

[caddo kid]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

you have no freedom from religion, it is freedom of Religion






.


.

The Bible definition of Religion is this:



James 1:27

• Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.

.

the last time Republicans did that Jesus wasn't even around; LOFL ..................

 

[caddo kid]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

I'm not discussing funding; that's something else altogether.

I'm saying that folks may wanna reconsider overturning a 46 year SCOTUS precedent.

That is asking for a SERIOUS slippery slope this nation will regret, forever.

Funding is a different issue so, try & stay on topic.

 

[HappyJoy]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

Can i ask you my fetus vs. baby question and you actually answer it?

 

[Manonthestreet]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

I'm not discussing funding; that's something else altogether.

I'm saying that folks may wanna reconsider overturning a 46 year SCOTUS precedent.

That is asking for a SERIOUS slippery slope this nation will regret, forever.

Funding is a different issue so, try & stay on topic.

And what about The precedent that was the norm how many yrs ......such nonsense......

 

[beautress]

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

you have no freedom from religion, it is freedom of Religion

.

The Bible definition of Religion is this:

James 1:27

• Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.

.

the last time Republicans did that Jesus wasn't even around; LOFL ..................

Yes he was around.

 

[beautress]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

Can i ask you my fetus vs. baby question and you actually answer it?

Yes.

 

[HappyJoy]

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

Can i ask you my fetus vs. baby question and you actually answer it?

Yes.

Cool.

A burning house has two rooms, one has two 6 week old fetuses and the other a 6 month old baby. You only have time to go into one room before the house collapses, which one do you save?

 

[beautress]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

I'm not discussing funding; that's something else altogether.

I'm saying that folks may wanna reconsider overturning a 46 year SCOTUS precedent.

That is asking for a SERIOUS slippery slope this nation will regret, forever.

Funding is a different issue so, try & stay on topic.

Funding is a problem, Brainiac. I am on topic. You're a Democrat, so you want to control the outcome more than do the right thing.

 

[HappyJoy]

I have never been pregnant & will never be pregnant because I am male.

Having said that I agree with a woman's right to choice in the US under the 46 year old SCOTUS ruling Roe v Wade.

America is supposed to be about freedom for the people aka citizens, and a woman's right to choose is certainly one of many freedoms within our nation.

IMO it is asking for a 'Pandora's box' to approach a 46 year old SCOTUS precedent such as Roe v Wade.

If the GOP are successful in having Roe v Wade overturned then get ready for legal chaos in this nation of rule of law, which would result in the rule of chaos.

Be careful what you wish for

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

I'm not discussing funding; that's something else altogether.

I'm saying that folks may wanna reconsider overturning a 46 year SCOTUS precedent.

That is asking for a SERIOUS slippery slope this nation will regret, forever.

Funding is a different issue so, try & stay on topic.

Funding is a problem, Brainiac. I am on topic. You're a Democrat, so you want to control the outcome more than do the right thing.

I'd say funding a surgical procedure is not the topic here unless you want to include in the discussion government funding for vasectomies and the that changes everything. Here we are talking about Roe v Wade.

 

[caddo kid]

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

I'm not discussing funding; that's something else altogether.

I'm saying that folks may wanna reconsider overturning a 46 year SCOTUS precedent.

That is asking for a SERIOUS slippery slope this nation will regret, forever.

Funding is a different issue so, try & stay on topic.

Funding is a problem, Brainiac. I am on topic. You're a Democrat, so you want to control the outcome more than do the right thing.

I'd say funding a surgical procedure is not the topic here unless you want to include in the discussion government funding for vasectomies and the that changes everything. Here we are talking about Roe v Wade.

I already tried telling that stupid ass **** to stay on topic but all she wants to do is talk bull shit

 

[HappyJoy]

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

I'm not discussing funding; that's something else altogether.

I'm saying that folks may wanna reconsider overturning a 46 year SCOTUS precedent.

That is asking for a SERIOUS slippery slope this nation will regret, forever.

Funding is a different issue so, try & stay on topic.

Funding is a problem, Brainiac. I am on topic. You're a Democrat, so you want to control the outcome more than do the right thing.

I'd say funding a surgical procedure is not the topic here unless you want to include in the discussion government funding for vasectomies and the that changes everything. Here we are talking about Roe v Wade.

I already tried telling that stupid ass **** to stay on topic but all she wants to do is talk bull shit

And shockingly this person apparently values the life of a baby more than two fetuses. They are all hypocrites.

 

[alang1216]

Vote &/or offer your personal thoughts.

Keep in mind this poll isn't asking YOUR opinion on the law but rather how the Justices will come down on the subject.

Stare decisis.

The court will declare the Alabama law unconstitutional but will continue to chip away at the edges of the right to an abortion. Until the public reverses its support the court will not get ahead of the public on this.

What court?

The supreme one.

The one with Kavanaugh and Gorsuch that one?

Uhhhh... Yep, that's the one.

 

[beautress]

So you agree that it is a woman's right to kill her own unborn child. I'm gonna faint.

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

Can i ask you my fetus vs. baby question and you actually answer it?

Yes.

Cool.

A burning house has two rooms, one has two 6 week old fetuses and the other a 6 month old baby. You only have time to go into one room before the house collapses, which one do you save?

I'm not qualified to be a fireman, but if he has a room with two expectant mothers carrying fetuses, or one 6-month old baby, he will have to make a decision. My decision would be to call other firemen to the scene to improve the chances of all of them, saving all 5. I know fireman. They've pulled out dead bodies from many fires over a long career. I pray for and bless the firemen to have the strength to make the best decision. Prayer works, in case you are wondering.

 

[candycorn]

You never told us….
If you believe in God and that He controls all things….
When a baby dies in utero….clearly that was God’s design.
So if God has no problem snuffing out a life….why do you?

I believe that you would blame God for something he ordered, even though he gave you a finite life in which he hoped you would become a considerate human being instead of one who wars against living humans-to-be, in spite of being an otherwise well-off, politically correct human being. And you are the last person on this planet I would trust, since you have zero respect for helpless living beings dependent on others to help him become a doctor who figured out how to rid the planet of diseases, a sanitation worker who figured out an economical way to clean up the detritus in the 7 seas thrown in by thoughtless dolts, a woman who found a simple solution for and slimmed down all the obese people on the planet to stay that way, a musician who would write a piece of work so uplifting depressed people would regain their sense of happiness for life, a biochemist who would develop a beautiful flowering plant that would clean up the skies and yield a fruit that would when eaten make a human brain wiser, a minister who would prepare people to turn away from lying, stealing, raping, hating, killing, and disrespecting of parents into loving, caring persons who would bring about heaven on this earth, and creative people who'd make this world a better place and would feel a part of the good they did, but no. We must go with the flow and support bad things for people made worse by them, like aborting one's own child, and not thinking about it until facing St. Peter and that aborted child and all his brethren at Heaven's gate, restored to the full glory they would have had in life. If we would only let them live, might be that heaven was right here all along, and since one of them would bring about no more death, we'll have to die first to find out the secrets God entrusted to those who were aborted by truly immature, disrespectful, thoughtless, and hateful beings in charge of human misery on this side whose parents did not abort them. Our job is to make life better, not worse for the unborn who will bring more answers to our kind. And that's what I think and will until God says "Your days are up. Thanks for standing up for the helpless who lost life to those gone wrong." God's blessings are better than your curses.

Thats all fine (and gibberish) but….

You still have never told us….
If you believe in God and that He controls all things….
When a baby dies in utero….clearly that was God’s design.
So if God has no problem snuffing out a life….why do you?

And if you believe that God kills babies (or at least doesn’t prevent their death)….how can you worship such a being?

Read the Proverbs and you will know why I worship God. Then read the book of Matthew. That will answer your question, but you won't like it.

Sorry to paint you into the corner showing you the hilarious ridiculousness of your own beliefs—so much so that you’ve had to cower behind “read this” and “read that” instead of answering a direct question.

But you really brought it on yourself.

So God kills a baby. You supposedly hate that.
But you worship the God that allows a baby to die.

Yep—that is your existence in a nutshell.

You can continue to deny it but it is the truth.

I'm in no corner, but you're in the loser's corner as long as you hate God,

Can’t hate something that doesn’t exist.

hate his people,

Bitch please.

I don’t hate Christians. I do dislike stupid people and hypocrites. You are both.

love and support those killing the unborn,

Strange…I thought the Bible said “love thy neighbor”. Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself" If you don’t think I should “love” my neighbor…why are you going against the teachings of the Bible?

and fool yourself into thinking that bad is good and that good is bad. God is not in charge of a mother who kills her own child. He has, however, left that child at St. Peter's gate to point a finger at the evil person who tries to sneak in undetected in full patronage of others, O Madam Arrogance.

The women who have a baby die in utero didn’t “kill her own child”.

So again, please explain to us how, if God is in charge of everything….how he can let a baby die before it’s taken it’s first breath….and how you can worship a God who rubs out a life like that?

You never answered that question. Are you scared?

 

[candycorn]

I don't believe the 'state' has the authority to determine what a woman can, or cannot do with her own body, in a nation that claims it is for freedom, and particularly considering a 46 year SCOUT precedent.

This nation is a nation where we have freedom of religion but we also have freedom from religion.

If you desire The AmeriKKKan Taliban then you are for the GOP with their agenda to relegate women & women's right into the 17th century.

Good luck wit dat

I don't believe the state should charge me for females who kill their own babies by listening to the lies of smoothe talkers who tell them how good their decision for themselves was, when in fact, it's a soul-kiliing thing to do to oneself, to kill one's unborn child. Those 600 million dead fetuses? There was a price to pay, and taxpayers have been taxed to death for a stupid Roe v. Wade footshoot decision against all unborn childrenin this nation. I'm sorry to tell you, but women are nothing like men. We are the givers of life, we need partners, but we don't need yo bull. And it's on you if you rattle some poor girl's hormones.

Can i ask you my fetus vs. baby question and you actually answer it?

Yes.

Cool.

A burning house has two rooms, one has two 6 week old fetuses and the other a 6 month old baby. You only have time to go into one room before the house collapses, which one do you save?

I'm not qualified to be a fireman, but if he has a room with two expectant mothers carrying fetuses, or one 6-month old baby, he will have to make a decision. My decision would be to call other firemen to the scene to improve the chances of all of them, saving all 5. I know fireman. They've pulled out dead bodies from many fires over a long career. I pray for and bless the firemen to have the strength to make the best decision. Prayer works, in case you are wondering.

Wow…you can’t answer a single direct question…can you?