Will the National GOP learn from Virginia?

Since 1860, Republicans have won the Presidency 23 times. dimocrap scum 16.

From 1860 to 1900.... 9 of 11 races went to Republicans, including 6 wins in a row.

In the 'modern era' which is generally regarded as post-1950, Republicans have won 9 times and dimocrap scum 7 times.

Since 1960, it's tied at 7. Since 1980, it's Patriotic American Good Guys 5 wins, and scum of the fucking Earth dimocraps 4 wins.

And you idiots are going to tell us to dig our graves?

You people really are stupid, aren't you? Nevermind, stupid people are seldom smart enough to know how stupid they really are

Hey don't sugarcoat it bro, tell us how you really feel.
 
I don't understand why anyone would want to drive over a 40 year old bridge? Or not want their children educated.

The tea party is like electing the muslim brotherhood. Illogical and plain dumb.

give me one quote from a tea party person where he or she said that we should not maintain our bridges or not educate children.

You won't get one. It takes straw men to attack the Tea Party
 
The TeaPs "aren't the speaker or judge of what the people want in this country"

80% of America despise the TPM
 
The dems did every wrong they could, including the disastrous ACA roll out.

The TeaP lost anyway.

Parasitic Faction credo Feed me, insure me , take care of my needs and

three-wise-monkeys.jpg


.

.
 
I'm personally shocked and appalled buisiness would not give money to an attny general who wanted a law to make it possible for one biz to sue another biz for employing illegal aliens. those rat bastards threw the race to the dems.
 
Actually, the GOP should have kept the Governor's mansion from all historical accounts

Dude, Virginia voted for Democrat in the last two elections and has two Democratic Senators. Northern Virginia is being flooded with liberal government workers. And leftists claim Republicans are hosed because the tea party shut down Washington. And the Democrats spent four times as much money.

And you're gloating you won a squeaker? How much kool-aid did you drink today?
 
The TeaP candidate lost only because the TeaPs closed the government, threatened to default the American taxpayer, and wanted to stick ultra sound wands up vaginas.

Yes, a normal GOP candidate would have won handily.
 
the lesson of NJ---------put an R behind the name of a liberal and he will win in a blue state, BFD.

Or put an R behind the name of a nutjob and you lose a general election...

that may apply to McCain, but Romney is not a nut job, he would have been a great president. But we will never know because you fools gave Barry another 4 years to continue his destruction of our economy and our culture.

President Obama was, is, and always will be the superior choice to Mitt Romney; otherwise Romney would have won. The voters got it correct.
 
The TeaP candidate lost only because the TeaPs closed the government, threatened to default the American taxpayer, and wanted to stick ultra sound wands up vaginas.

Yes, a normal GOP candidate would have won handily.

In a state that voted the last two elections for the Democrat and has two Democratic senators where the Democrats spent four times as much money and everyone hates the tea party and blames them for the gridlock? What is your projection based on exactly?
 
Or put an R behind the name of a nutjob and you lose a general election...

that may apply to McCain, but Romney is not a nut job, he would have been a great president. But we will never know because you fools gave Barry another 4 years to continue his destruction of our economy and our culture.

President Obama was, is, and always will be the superior choice to Mitt Romney; otherwise Romney would have won. The voters got it correct.

Voters got correct that Obama was going to give them more handouts.
 
Or put an R behind the name of a nutjob and you lose a general election...

that may apply to McCain, but Romney is not a nut job, he would have been a great president. But we will never know because you fools gave Barry another 4 years to continue his destruction of our economy and our culture.

President Obama was, is, and always will be the superior choice to Mitt Romney; otherwise Romney would have won. The voters got it correct.

lol, he's so superior his approvals are in the toilet
now you need to kiss his picture or bow to the shine you have of him
 
Opinion: What GOP can learn from Cuccinelli's tanking bid in Virginia - CNN.com

(CNN) -- Virginia is a cautionary tale for conservatives this year. And those Republicans who always argue that their party wins when it moves further to the right are going to have a lot of explaining to do after Election Day.

This was written before the election, but I doubt the GOP will learn a lesson. Their call now is, "But the margin wasn't as big as......"

Actually, the GOP should have kept the Governor's mansion from all historical accounts. And they could have if they had nominated Bill Bolling the moderate Lt Gov. But the TP fanatics and the untra-right out of state money pushed for Coooooch.

This is just a small lesson for the national GOP. Will they heed the warning or continue their march to the right?

I agree. They'll double down & say that they weren't Right enough again :eusa_doh:
 
The TeaP candidate lost only because the TeaPs closed the government, threatened to default the American taxpayer, and wanted to stick ultra sound wands up vaginas.

Yes, a normal GOP candidate would have won handily.

In a state that voted the last two elections for the Democrat and has two Democratic senators where the Democrats spent four times as much money and everyone hates the tea party and blames them for the gridlock? What is your projection based on exactly?

Hint? The TeaP candidate lost, a normal Republican would have won.

80% of America plus a majority of the GOP despise the TPM.
 
Rush says the RNC coulda and shoulda spent a lot more than the piddling $1,000,000 they spent on this race. They coulda gotten some big hitters to campaign for Cuccinelli.

The fact they didn't has to be blamed on the old timers in the GOP.

This was supposed to be a referendum on Obamacare.

He continued, 'if the GOP had won in VA they could have made it really difficult for Dems to win in the next election by campaigning on Obamacare.'

the GOP old timers are working against the best interest of America by working against the new, ambitious warriors for our Country.

establishment republicans fear the tea party as much as the democrats do, if not more.

yep. and the VA race proves that - they decided to "punish" Cuch :lol:
establishment GOP feels pretty good in opposition - as all they want is "business as usual" and TP threatened to drain that swamp :D
 
The TeaP candidate lost only because the TeaPs closed the government, threatened to default the American taxpayer, and wanted to stick ultra sound wands up vaginas.

Yes, a normal GOP candidate would have won handily.

In a state that voted the last two elections for the Democrat and has two Democratic senators where the Democrats spent four times as much money and everyone hates the tea party and blames them for the gridlock? What is your projection based on exactly?

Hint? The TeaP candidate lost, a normal Republican would have won.

80% of America plus a majority of the GOP despise the TPM.

Repeating your claim doesn't support it. The question was what your projection is based on in a State that has two Democratic Senators and voted Democrat in the last to elections and hates the tea party and the Democrat outspent the Republican by four times. And then won a squeaker.

Northern Virginia is booming with liberals, Virginia is becoming a blue State again. Do you have an argument as to why a "normal Republican" would have won? Or are you just going to state as assumption they would again?
 
jakie the one trick pony...tea party tea party tea party tea party and he never tires of repeating the same crap over and over
 
In a state that voted the last two elections for the Democrat and has two Democratic senators where the Democrats spent four times as much money and everyone hates the tea party and blames them for the gridlock? What is your projection based on exactly?

Hint? The TeaP candidate lost, a normal Republican would have won.

80% of America plus a majority of the GOP despise the TPM.

Repeating your claim doesn't support it. The question was what your projection is based on in a State that has two Democratic Senators and voted Democrat in the last to elections and hates the tea party and the Democrat outspent the Republican by four times. And then won a squeaker.

Northern Virginia is booming with liberals, Virginia is becoming a blue State again. Do you have an argument as to why a "normal Republican" would have won? Or are you just going to state as assumption they would again?

Northern Virginia certainly does not help.

However, pure math and some analysis prove that if the candidate who basically does not have support from his own party loses with a 1% difference and the third candidate - an obvious shill from the left gained 90% of his votes in the precincts which were NOT northern - than there is room left.
It is the ones fooled by a "libertarian" ideas which caused this particular race to go the way it did.
However, I have to agree with Jake that if this race had one week more - Cuch would have won.

It amazes me that a man who plays a clown 99% of the time is actually able to diagnose the reality precisely when he does not, because it warrants the question - what's the purpose of the clowning?
 

Forum List

Back
Top