Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This guy explains why all these computer models don't work and how man made climate change is fake.
Climate models don't work.
Climate will change with or without C02 change.
I'm skeptical about ANYTHING on GW that comes out of Heartland. Just saying. But I'll watch a bit..
This guy explains why all these computer models don't work and how man made climate change is fake.
Climate models don't work.
Climate will change with or without C02 change.
This guy explains why all these computer models don't work and how man made climate change is fake.
Climate models don't work.
Climate will change with or without C02 change.
Paid, discredited liar who has no experience in any climate field and has published no science on any related topic in any related field.
in other words, hero to all Trumpkins.
This guy explains why all these computer models don't work and how man made climate change is fake.
Climate models don't work.
Climate will change with or without C02 change.
Paid, discredited liar who has no experience in any climate field and has published no science on any related topic in any related field.
in other words, hero to all Trumpkins.
Yet you can't proof a word of your lies AS USUAL.
This guy explains why all these computer models don't work and how man made climate change is fake.
Climate models don't work.
Climate will change with or without C02 change.
Paid, discredited liar who has no experience in any climate field and has published no science on any related topic in any related field.
in other words, hero to all Trumpkins.
Yet you can't proof a word of your lies AS USUAL.
Of course I can. He has no experience and has published no peer-reviewed science on any related topic in any related field.
Fact.
He has been discredited as being a "denier for hire", even suggesting to the people offering to hire him that his work would pretty much become worthless, if subjected to actual peer review. Thus, he offered a hand-picked list of deniers to review it. Which of course isd not actual peer review, but a complete scam.
fact.
When offered money, he suggested that the fee go to the "CO2 Coalition", so as not to overtly demonstrate that he gets paid directly for bullshit. Guess who gets paychecks from the CO2 Coalition, a foundation set up to get anonymous money from fossil fuel industry sources to do "independent research" (yet has never gotten a single article through a peer-reviewed journal)? You guessed it! Happer.
Fact.
yes, trump's next little lying bitch is a joke. Please don't tell me this is surprising to you.
This guy explains why all these computer models don't work and how man made climate change is fake.
Climate models don't work.
Climate will change with or without C02 change.
Paid, discredited liar who has no experience in any climate field and has published no science on any related topic in any related field.
in other words, hero to all Trumpkins.
This guy explains why all these computer models don't work and how man made climate change is fake.
Climate models don't work.
Climate will change with or without C02 change.
Paid, discredited liar who has no experience in any climate field and has published no science on any related topic in any related field.
in other words, hero to all Trumpkins.
So what specifically did he say that you disagree with, and do you have any observed, measured, quantified evidence that empirically that he is wrong? Or is this just another of your logical fallacies which you are completely unable to support?
Maybe if you could live 3 or 4 thousand years you and the rest of the liars would realize it's normal.I am 74 years old. And my interest is geology. Therefore, I have been in the mountains a lot since I was 20 years old. And I have seen, decade by decade, the snows come later and melt earlier in the Cascades, Sierras, Rockies, and Blues. I have seen the glaciers recede in all those ranges. This is not computer models, this is actual observations.
As far as the computer models go, they have been wrong. What we have seen, that, as a whole, they have been far too conservative. The melt in the Arctic and Antarctic has been far greater than any predicted. The intensity of the hurricanes has exceeded predictions. The extreme weather events have exceeded predictions. The temperature rise in the atmosphere has not been as great, but the amount of energy absorbed by the ocean has been far greater. So we learn as we go, and add factors to the models. As I learned in statistics, models are not correct, but they are useful.