Ragnar
<--- Pic is not me
- Thread starter
- #21
Speculation is fine with you and me. IT IS NOT FINE WITH THE MEDIA OR OFFICIALS.
Essentially, news needs to stop reporting shit they know nothing about because it causes real, tangible harm. These people in the photos are likely to go through some serious problems because of this or could even have been harmed.
Look at what happened to sandy hook. The national dialog was sent back and tainted with continual incorrect bullshit. There are still people that do not know half of what they believe is false because the media kept reporting falsehoods and things they knew nothing about.
I mostly agree. Not much can be done about the media (free press) other than holding them to account with the facts and making sure bad actors get punished with derision, mocking and maybe best of all lost viewership. (maybe boycotts if that's your thing)
The authorities better damn well get it right and if not we have the constitutional means to get them thrown out of office. (elected authorities anyway, bureaucrats are tougher but they all have elected bosses at some point)
Well, yes a boycott is the way to go as this is obviously not a legal matter in that you cannot restrict the press. Boycott really misses it though because that implies some sort of conscious organization. People just need to wake up and stop feeding the giants. Personally, I have stopped patronizing virtually all news sources. They are not worth the time. I can get all my news from a ton of varied sources right here on the internet with very little contact with the alphabet soup and their entertainment shows (as they no longer qualify as actual news). AP reports can be garnered from other places and most real data can be mined from source material rather than the cut up versions that the media gives you anyway. Want to know about budgets, expenditures and changing receipts? The news will only feed you lies about that. Go to the CBO and the Whitehouse historical tables. Want to know about gun control, go to the FBI crime statistics. New laws? They are there online. There is truth in source material and lies in material where you let others do your thinking.
I would hope that enough people see the light and force the news agencies to actually go back to reporting but I fear that we are only going to wrong direction. People dont really want real information, that makes them think. All they want is an affirmation of their core beliefs and some empty entertainment.
Always a good idea going the multiple sources route and the internet is truly built with exactly that in mind. Old PoliSci Prof. always shared a favorite quote of his, "Stealing from one source is plagiarism. Stealing from many sources is scholarship".
As for the rest I agree there too but would hasten to add that this is clearly a big problem but it's not a particularly new problem. Back in the nineteenth century any decent sized town had multiple partisan newspapers fighting for business, news leads, circulation and often eachother. I think it was Mark Twain who said, "If you don't read the paper you're uninformed. If you do read the paper you're misinformed.".
Maybe it was just always is way.