rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,050
- 157,772
Scalia was someone who believed the rich should buy elections, that because someone won the popular vote they shouldn't be listened to or even have their votes counted, that people should be executed even after the evidence that put them on death row was discredited. He someone who thought your employer should be able to dictate your health care based on their superstitions.
The world is truly a better place now that he's taking a dirt nap.
Actually he believed that if you want to change the constitution, you use the amendment process as intended, not by convincing 5 of 9 un-elected lawyers to do it for you. That he actually was one of those un-elected lawyers and understood the intended limits of his position only increases my respect for him, regardless of your feckless hatred of him.
He strictly defended the Constitution when it supported his views
When it didn't ....not so much
Examples?
Bush
Heller
Citizens United
The Bush case I agree was a clusterfuck, either way the court decided the other side would throw a fit, and both sides would have a right to be angry.
As for heller, the people have the right to keep and bear arms, not the state, not the militia, not the government only, the PEOPLE.
And as for citizens united, forming a corporation doesn't mean you lose your 1st amendment rights.
A strict constitutionalist does not block votes from being counted
A strict interpretation of the Constitution does not ignore a well regulated militia
No interpretation of founding fathers intent would allow corporations equal standing with citizens in influencing the political process