Woman charged for trying to shoot tires of shoplifter

Trying to shoot the fucking tires out... good grief.
I agree. Deflection is dangerous. The first shot takes the glass, the second tap goes to the head.
I doubt a dumb hoe who thinks it's wise to open fire in a public parking lot can make a head shot

She should have shot the thief in the head and done the rest of us a favor.
Quite right...a summary public execution can be the only just sentence for a shoplifter!
Surely the woman is destined to be the new Conservative hero de-jour.


A thief is a thief. The amount taken or using a term to lessen that the person STOLE something is irrelevant. Here's a hint. Don't steal and it won't be an issue.

If you steal from me, I don't care if it's a penny or all I have. Stealing is stealing.
Didn't I agree with you?
Shoot that dirty shoplifter in the head!
And shoot people that walk out of a shop knowing that they've been given too much change...damned thieves!

And shoot jaywalkers too...if you don't follow the rules then you deserve to die.

Oooo...ooo...what about those dirty bastards that spit on the sidewalk!
I hate that...gun them down too I say!
 
You'd love Sharia law.

I hate thieves and the amount they steal is irrelevant. Why do you justify thievery because it's a small amount?
Yep you'd love it :thup:

So you do think the amount stolen matters and that a thief really isn't a thief unless they steal something of an amount to the level you determine. Got it. You support thieves which puts you on the same sorry level they are.
By your logic, you support a toddler getting shot in the head for stealing a gumball. That's fucked up man.

By your logic, a toddler and an adult think on the same level. A toddler doesn't know better. An adult should.

What's fucked up is you give an adult THIEF a pass.
No. What's fucked up is you think all crimes deserve a death penalty. And from vigilante citizens no less.
 
US woman charged for shooting at fleeing shoplifter

A perfect example of a CCW person playing Charles Bronson in a busy parking lot, and putting bystanders at risk.

Is she what some call a "responsible gun owner"?
legally, you can only use deadly force when you have a reasonable belief that failing to do so will cause you or another innocent to suffer imminent severe bodily harm

so what she did was improper. and a shoplifter is not a criminal activity that justifies using such force

however, I don't really get all worked up if criminals get shot

How do you feel about her losing her right to carry because of this incident? For a little while, forever, not at all?

No one needs to carry a concealed weapon in a urban environment, unless you carry a lot on money, or something like that. In addition, she has shown why she should not have such a license. The cops are making a statement about this issue, and using her as an example, and rightly so. If she wants to keep a gun in her home, fine. She doesn't need to be walking the streets with a gun, and since it was a no brainer that she should not have drawn her weapon in the first place, I have no confidence that she is going to be any smarter next time.

Who the hell do you think you are to determine what someone needs or doesn't need to do. I don't think you should be allowed in public. Are you willing to stay hidden because you've shown you're an idiot.

I'm sure that there is an anger management class near where you live, Conservative.

I'm sure that you will never understand the concept that an adult thief is a thief no matter how much of how little they steal.
 
No one needs to carry a concealed weapon in a urban environment ... .

Yeah... right.

maxresdefault.jpg
 
I agree. Deflection is dangerous. The first shot takes the glass, the second tap goes to the head.
I doubt a dumb hoe who thinks it's wise to open fire in a public parking lot can make a head shot

She should have shot the thief in the head and done the rest of us a favor.
Quite right...a summary public execution can be the only just sentence for a shoplifter!
Surely the woman is destined to be the new Conservative hero de-jour.


A thief is a thief. The amount taken or using a term to lessen that the person STOLE something is irrelevant. Here's a hint. Don't steal and it won't be an issue.

If you steal from me, I don't care if it's a penny or all I have. Stealing is stealing.
Didn't I agree with you?
Shoot that dirty shoplifter in the head!
And shoot people that walk out of a shop knowing that they've been given too much change...damned thieves!

And shoot jaywalkers too...if you don't follow the rules then you deserve to die.

Oooo...ooo...what about those dirty bastards that spit on the sidewalk!
I hate that...gun them down too I say!

Jaywalkers aren't taking from anyone else.
 
legally, you can only use deadly force when you have a reasonable belief that failing to do so will cause you or another innocent to suffer imminent severe bodily harm

so what she did was improper. and a shoplifter is not a criminal activity that justifies using such force

however, I don't really get all worked up if criminals get shot

How do you feel about her losing her right to carry because of this incident? For a little while, forever, not at all?

No one needs to carry a concealed weapon in a urban environment, unless you carry a lot on money, or something like that. In addition, she has shown why she should not have such a license. The cops are making a statement about this issue, and using her as an example, and rightly so. If she wants to keep a gun in her home, fine. She doesn't need to be walking the streets with a gun, and since it was a no brainer that she should not have drawn her weapon in the first place, I have no confidence that she is going to be any smarter next time.

Who the hell do you think you are to determine what someone needs or doesn't need to do. I don't think you should be allowed in public. Are you willing to stay hidden because you've shown you're an idiot.

I'm sure that there is an anger management class near where you live, Conservative.

I'm sure that you will never understand the concept that an adult thief is a thief no matter how much of how little they steal.

Perhaps we should bring back crucifixion?
 
I hate thieves and the amount they steal is irrelevant. Why do you justify thievery because it's a small amount?
Yep you'd love it :thup:

So you do think the amount stolen matters and that a thief really isn't a thief unless they steal something of an amount to the level you determine. Got it. You support thieves which puts you on the same sorry level they are.
By your logic, you support a toddler getting shot in the head for stealing a gumball. That's fucked up man.

By your logic, a toddler and an adult think on the same level. A toddler doesn't know better. An adult should.

What's fucked up is you give an adult THIEF a pass.
No. What's fucked up is you think all crimes deserve a death penalty. And from vigilante citizens no less.

Not all crimes. What's fucked up is you don't think any crime does.
 
I agree. Deflection is dangerous. The first shot takes the glass, the second tap goes to the head.
I doubt a dumb hoe who thinks it's wise to open fire in a public parking lot can make a head shot

She should have shot the thief in the head and done the rest of us a favor.
Quite right...a summary public execution can be the only just sentence for a shoplifter!
Surely the woman is destined to be the new Conservative hero de-jour.


A thief is a thief. The amount taken or using a term to lessen that the person STOLE something is irrelevant. Here's a hint. Don't steal and it won't be an issue.

If you steal from me, I don't care if it's a penny or all I have. Stealing is stealing.
Didn't I agree with you?
Shoot that dirty shoplifter in the head!
And shoot people that walk out of a shop knowing that they've been given too much change...damned thieves!

And shoot jaywalkers too...if you don't follow the rules then you deserve to die.

Oooo...ooo...what about those dirty bastards that spit on the sidewalk!
I hate that...gun them down too I say!

Well, there are certainly different degrees of thievery. If a person breaks into your home to steal things and you are there? Then, yes, I think you should be able to defend yourself as well as your property, and your store too, such as if looters or thieves are trying to rob you.
 
How do you feel about her losing her right to carry because of this incident? For a little while, forever, not at all?

No one needs to carry a concealed weapon in a urban environment, unless you carry a lot on money, or something like that. In addition, she has shown why she should not have such a license. The cops are making a statement about this issue, and using her as an example, and rightly so. If she wants to keep a gun in her home, fine. She doesn't need to be walking the streets with a gun, and since it was a no brainer that she should not have drawn her weapon in the first place, I have no confidence that she is going to be any smarter next time.

Who the hell do you think you are to determine what someone needs or doesn't need to do. I don't think you should be allowed in public. Are you willing to stay hidden because you've shown you're an idiot.

I'm sure that there is an anger management class near where you live, Conservative.

I'm sure that you will never understand the concept that an adult thief is a thief no matter how much of how little they steal.

Perhaps we should bring back crucifixion?

If the punishment actually fit the crime, perhaps people wouldn't commit so many. If they did, they deserve what they get.
 
Yep. This is a perfect example for you of a a CCW person playing Charles Bronson in a busy parking lot, and putting bystanders at risk.


One example.

Noone was hurt, luckily and I hope she does not actually do jail time for such a minor incident.

Lose of CCW seems certainly called for.
She should have done at least 6 months for reckless endangerment. That kind of incident is not minor, and that attitude that it is will bring about Australian gun laws here. You act responsibly with a firearm, or you do time, and lose your ability to ever own one again.
 
I doubt a dumb hoe who thinks it's wise to open fire in a public parking lot can make a head shot

She should have shot the thief in the head and done the rest of us a favor.
Quite right...a summary public execution can be the only just sentence for a shoplifter!
Surely the woman is destined to be the new Conservative hero de-jour.


A thief is a thief. The amount taken or using a term to lessen that the person STOLE something is irrelevant. Here's a hint. Don't steal and it won't be an issue.

If you steal from me, I don't care if it's a penny or all I have. Stealing is stealing.
Didn't I agree with you?
Shoot that dirty shoplifter in the head!
And shoot people that walk out of a shop knowing that they've been given too much change...damned thieves!

And shoot jaywalkers too...if you don't follow the rules then you deserve to die.

Oooo...ooo...what about those dirty bastards that spit on the sidewalk!
I hate that...gun them down too I say!

Well, there are certainly different degrees of thievery. If a person breaks into your home to steal things and you are there? Then, yes, I think you should be able to defend yourself as well as your property, and your store too, such as if looters or thieves are trying to rob you.

You don't need to carry a concealed weapon for either of those scenarios.
 
I doubt a dumb hoe who thinks it's wise to open fire in a public parking lot can make a head shot

She should have shot the thief in the head and done the rest of us a favor.
Quite right...a summary public execution can be the only just sentence for a shoplifter!
Surely the woman is destined to be the new Conservative hero de-jour.


A thief is a thief. The amount taken or using a term to lessen that the person STOLE something is irrelevant. Here's a hint. Don't steal and it won't be an issue.

If you steal from me, I don't care if it's a penny or all I have. Stealing is stealing.
Didn't I agree with you?
Shoot that dirty shoplifter in the head!
And shoot people that walk out of a shop knowing that they've been given too much change...damned thieves!

And shoot jaywalkers too...if you don't follow the rules then you deserve to die.

Oooo...ooo...what about those dirty bastards that spit on the sidewalk!
I hate that...gun them down too I say!

Well, there are certainly different degrees of thievery. If a person breaks into your home to steal things and you are there? Then, yes, I think you should be able to defend yourself as well as your property, and your store too, such as if looters or thieves are trying to rob you.

No. Only different amounts stolen. If you steal, you're a thief. The lesser amount doesn't make you a less thief.
 
Well, if a shop lifter is fleeing, I don't think shooting and killing them is very fair. If they are on your property, since you can't know for sure of their intentions (a lot of people are killed in robberies/sometimes intentionally and sometimes not), then it is completely justified, IMO.
 
Yep you'd love it :thup:

So you do think the amount stolen matters and that a thief really isn't a thief unless they steal something of an amount to the level you determine. Got it. You support thieves which puts you on the same sorry level they are.
By your logic, you support a toddler getting shot in the head for stealing a gumball. That's fucked up man.

By your logic, a toddler and an adult think on the same level. A toddler doesn't know better. An adult should.

What's fucked up is you give an adult THIEF a pass.
No. What's fucked up is you think all crimes deserve a death penalty. And from vigilante citizens no less.

Not all crimes. What's fucked up is you don't think any crime does.
No what's fucked up is you supporting opening fire in a crowded parking lot like this was the wild west. Gun laws were put in place to stop us from being like the wild west.
 
She should have shot the thief in the head and done the rest of us a favor.
Quite right...a summary public execution can be the only just sentence for a shoplifter!
Surely the woman is destined to be the new Conservative hero de-jour.


A thief is a thief. The amount taken or using a term to lessen that the person STOLE something is irrelevant. Here's a hint. Don't steal and it won't be an issue.

If you steal from me, I don't care if it's a penny or all I have. Stealing is stealing.
Didn't I agree with you?
Shoot that dirty shoplifter in the head!
And shoot people that walk out of a shop knowing that they've been given too much change...damned thieves!

And shoot jaywalkers too...if you don't follow the rules then you deserve to die.

Oooo...ooo...what about those dirty bastards that spit on the sidewalk!
I hate that...gun them down too I say!

Well, there are certainly different degrees of thievery. If a person breaks into your home to steal things and you are there? Then, yes, I think you should be able to defend yourself as well as your property, and your store too, such as if looters or thieves are trying to rob you.

You don't need to carry a concealed weapon for either of those scenarios.

I disagree. What do you base your argument upon?
 
Well, if a shop lifter is fleeing, I don't think shooting and killing them is very fair. If they are on your property, since you can't know for sure of their intentions (a lot of people are killed in robberies/sometimes intentionally and sometimes not), then it is completely justified, IMO.
Sure. But in a busy parking lot when you don't know anything about the situation and you could just as easily gun down a bystander than a person who stole $50 worth of stuff it is not justified. Especially if there are witnesses and cameras that would eventually track the person down anyways.
 
By your logic, you support a toddler getting shot in the head for stealing a gumball.

Reader, this is a fatal flaw in reasoning that has been identified for 3500 years. OKA: Reductio ad absurdum (Which is Latin: "reduction to absurdity"), the modern idiots are still succumbing to this crippling form of reasoning.

The woman's behavior was foolish. She fired a firearm, threatening the lives of innocents all around her, for reasons other than defending her own safety or the safety of those around her. Such is the behavior common to Progs all over the world, everyday. Just last weekend, 40 people were murdered by the product of socialism, in Chicago alone... .

And as the above would-be 'Contributor' recently pointed out, is no where CLOSE to the most violent of Leftist population centers.
 
She should have shot the thief in the head and done the rest of us a favor.
Quite right...a summary public execution can be the only just sentence for a shoplifter!
Surely the woman is destined to be the new Conservative hero de-jour.


A thief is a thief. The amount taken or using a term to lessen that the person STOLE something is irrelevant. Here's a hint. Don't steal and it won't be an issue.

If you steal from me, I don't care if it's a penny or all I have. Stealing is stealing.
Didn't I agree with you?
Shoot that dirty shoplifter in the head!
And shoot people that walk out of a shop knowing that they've been given too much change...damned thieves!

And shoot jaywalkers too...if you don't follow the rules then you deserve to die.

Oooo...ooo...what about those dirty bastards that spit on the sidewalk!
I hate that...gun them down too I say!

Well, there are certainly different degrees of thievery. If a person breaks into your home to steal things and you are there? Then, yes, I think you should be able to defend yourself as well as your property, and your store too, such as if looters or thieves are trying to rob you.

You don't need to carry a concealed weapon for either of those scenarios.

You are such a know-it-all, telling thers what they "need." :rolleyes-41: Puuhleese!
 
Trying to shoot the fucking tires out... good grief.
I agree. Deflection is dangerous. The first shot takes the glass, the second tap goes to the head.
I doubt a dumb hoe who thinks it's wise to open fire in a public parking lot can make a head shot

She should have shot the thief in the head and done the rest of us a favor.

Here you are, RWer's. You own him. He is the poster child of why there are plenty of people walking around who don't have the judgement necessary to be a responsible gun owner.
 
Quite right...a summary public execution can be the only just sentence for a shoplifter!
Surely the woman is destined to be the new Conservative hero de-jour.


A thief is a thief. The amount taken or using a term to lessen that the person STOLE something is irrelevant. Here's a hint. Don't steal and it won't be an issue.

If you steal from me, I don't care if it's a penny or all I have. Stealing is stealing.
Didn't I agree with you?
Shoot that dirty shoplifter in the head!
And shoot people that walk out of a shop knowing that they've been given too much change...damned thieves!

And shoot jaywalkers too...if you don't follow the rules then you deserve to die.

Oooo...ooo...what about those dirty bastards that spit on the sidewalk!
I hate that...gun them down too I say!

Well, there are certainly different degrees of thievery. If a person breaks into your home to steal things and you are there? Then, yes, I think you should be able to defend yourself as well as your property, and your store too, such as if looters or thieves are trying to rob you.

You don't need to carry a concealed weapon for either of those scenarios.

You are such a know-it-all, telling thers what they "need." :rolleyes-41: Puuhleese!

Ok, if you don't like that answer, here is another one. A felon loses his right to own a gun forever. So should she.
 

Forum List

Back
Top