Women cannot be trusted with their own bodies

.

Abortion is the easy choice, Abortion is abdicating responsibility.

abortion is none of yer biz'nez.

Shedding your leftist indoctrination is taking responsibility.

you worry 'bout you & leave others to do the same about themselves.

Supporting women who have made the right choice is taking responsibility, which I do every month with a donation to this organization:


I feed and house those women and their babies.

sure.


How do you support women who make the hard choice?

again - it's none of yer biz'nez & those that feel they hafta announce their 'good deeds' are usually full of poo.

Adopting is taking responsibility which, by the way, white Christians do quite often, statistically:


that's nice.


"Christians. According to EthicsDaily.com, 5 percent of practicing Christians in the United States have adopted, which is more than twice the number of all adults who have adopted. In addition, a survey showed that 38 percent of practicing Christians had seriously considered adoption, while only 26 percent of all adults had.

lovely.

Caucasians. Most adoptive parents (73 percent) are non-Hispanic white adults, according to a study by the Barna Group. However, they are less likely to adopt a Caucasian child. Only 37 percent of children adopted are Caucasian."




.

whoop dee do.

it's still ZERO % any of yer biz'nez what others choose to do with their family planning or who they donate to.
 
Last edited:
Like what? The morality police?

images


see some similarity?
 
Once again women are complaining about laws (proposed or enacted) which make us a moral country. Saying you want control of your own body is a great slogan, but are you going to live your life in a good moral fashion if you get the control you want? Obviously more laws are needed.

---Allow women to have control over their own bodies---


---Liberal Sexual Morality: Where Promiscuity and Abortion Are Promoted---

It's only her body until she conceives. Then she is a duly appointed member of the US Procreation Corps, and obligated to follow their dictates.
 
It's only her body until she conceives. Then she is a duly appointed member of the US Procreation Corps, and obligated to follow their dictates.

i guess this must be on their flag:
stirrups.jpg
 
Once again women are complaining about laws (proposed or enacted) which make us a moral country. Saying you want control of your own body is a great slogan, but are you going to live your life in a good moral fashion if you get the control you want? Obviously more laws are needed.

---Allow women to have control over their own bodies---


---Liberal Sexual Morality: Where Promiscuity and Abortion Are Promoted---

Oh lookie here - someone tanned his nutsack
 
Well actually we do


No, if you can't define what a woman is, and demand that men be allowed to compete against women, that classifies you as mentally deranged.

No one pays the slightest attention to you at that point.
 
Women have little control over their bodies, until they get pregnant and even then they can be influenced by others.
 
Last edited:
The DNA of the child inside the woman is different than the mothers.. so this isn’t about anything to do with the woman’s body

that DNA contains 1/2 the female's genes & 1/2 of the male's.

guess what? cancer has its own unique sequencing as well.
 
John Wayne as an abortion doctor,

"We're gonna hafta... yank it otta there."
 
Sounds like someone hates men to say that. Men are, and have always been, the expendable sex. Women are the valued, protected sex

women have always been considered chattel.

a relatively short while ago, it was ok for a 'husband' to legally rape his wife.

women, on average, earn less than a man for the same work.

there had to be a constitutional amendment that allowed women to vote.

women couldn't own property or have their own credit card or get birth control without their husband's permission.
 
More laws aren't needed.

What's needed is a America with morals, standards and standards. We could get rid of a lot of laws if our country had that. Not saying it was perfect but in the 50s we didn't have issues we do now or so many laws because we had a general sense of morals, values and standards in our society.

Abortion wasn't such an issue either because of that because women were raised to be responsible in what they did and weren't all hedonistic rutting pigs jumping on every dick they can and shaking their ass in tv commercials. And that was partly due to having a father figure and a mother.
Wrong. That is Not how it was. Not even close.
 
women have always been considered chattel.
They are the most valued and catered to in society
a relatively short while ago, it was ok for a 'husband' to legally rape his wife.
When? And such a standard would go both ways.
women, on average, earn less than a man for the same work.
The gender pay gap has been thoroughly debunked by economists and people who don’t put their politics over math.
there had to be a constitutional amendment that allowed women to vote.
Many/most women didn’t want to vote then because doing so would make them eligible for military service. Men still have to register, women get free voting without the military responsibilities. What happened to equality?
women couldn't own property or have their own credit card or get birth control without their husband's permission.
And how long ago was that? And why? Let me guess.. evil, immoral men for the mysterious “patriarchy”?
 

Forum List

Back
Top