Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Daniel had a drug problem and numerous run ins with the law, his relatives are quick to admit.
But what Daniel was not, they say was a total stranger to 23-year-old Shane McDonald.
"Personally I don't know him," McDonald told reporters on Tuesday.
"They smoked drugs together, they smoked cocaine rocks together," said Darryl Daniel, Lewis' younger brother.
McDonald says she shot Daniel because his unwanted sexual advances made her fear for her life.
"I was just protecting myself," said McDonald.
No Daniel's brother said, she shot Lewis because he owed her 30 bucks.
While there's no sound on the video Daniel's brother says McDonalds' actions as well as his brothers' speaks volumes.
Notice how Daniel barely reacts when McDonald pulls the gun.
MOre on Marty's Dream Date!
Relatives say woman and man she shot at gas station were no stra - Houston weather, traffic, news | FOX 26 | MyFoxHouston
Daniel had a drug problem and numerous run ins with the law, his relatives are quick to admit.
But what Daniel was not, they say was a total stranger to 23-year-old Shane McDonald.
"Personally I don't know him," McDonald told reporters on Tuesday.
"They smoked drugs together, they smoked cocaine rocks together," said Darryl Daniel, Lewis' younger brother.
McDonald says she shot Daniel because his unwanted sexual advances made her fear for her life.
"I was just protecting myself," said McDonald.
No Daniel's brother said, she shot Lewis because he owed her 30 bucks.
While there's no sound on the video Daniel's brother says McDonalds' actions as well as his brothers' speaks volumes.
Notice how Daniel barely reacts when McDonald pulls the gun.
Jesus, I'm going to have to admit, Sunshine was on the right track here.
[
IF thats the case, she will be duly convicted by a jury of her peers.
Still not a reason to prevent me from owning a firearm.
[
IF thats the case, she will be duly convicted by a jury of her peers.
Still not a reason to prevent me from owning a firearm.
Because you haven't done anything crazy- yet?
That's not a good reason for the rest of us to let you have one.
[
IF thats the case, she will be duly convicted by a jury of her peers.
Still not a reason to prevent me from owning a firearm.
Because you haven't done anything crazy- yet?
That's not a good reason for the rest of us to let you have one.
[quo
The off chance that I "might" go crazy is not a reason to deny me the right to defend myself with a firearm.
And the rest of you have no right to deny me that unless I have been found incompetent by a judge, or convicted of a felony.
Since neither is the case, again, go pound sand, and as always, go fuck yourself.
[quo
The off chance that I "might" go crazy is not a reason to deny me the right to defend myself with a firearm.
And the rest of you have no right to deny me that unless I have been found incompetent by a judge, or convicted of a felony.
Since neither is the case, again, go pound sand, and as always, go fuck yourself.
If a jury or a judge can take it away from you, it isn't a right.
It's a privilage.
And the fact you can't tell the difference between a rape victim and a meth head tells me you probably don't have the judgement to "defend" yourself. Who knows who you'd shoot. Probably some grandfather or something.
[quo
The off chance that I "might" go crazy is not a reason to deny me the right to defend myself with a firearm.
And the rest of you have no right to deny me that unless I have been found incompetent by a judge, or convicted of a felony.
Since neither is the case, again, go pound sand, and as always, go fuck yourself.
If a jury or a judge can take it away from you, it isn't a right.
It's a privilage.
And the fact you can't tell the difference between a rape victim and a meth head tells me you probably don't have the judgement to "defend" yourself. Who knows who you'd shoot. Probably some grandfather or something.
Women Especially Should Embrace The 2nd Amendment.
I recommend they not listen to Anti-2nd Amendment wingnuts like Nancy Pelosi
Women Especially Should Embrace The 2nd Amendment.
I recommend they not listen to Anti-2nd Amendment wingnuts like Nancy Pelosi
Why does the thought of an armed Nancy Pelosi suddenly make me want to reconsider my position on gun control? I would recommend the next time you try to encourage people to embrace the 2nd Amendment you leave all references to lunatics like Nancy Pelosi out of it.
Women Especially Should Embrace The 2nd Amendment.
I recommend they not listen to Anti-2nd Amendment wingnuts like Nancy Pelosi
Why does the thought of an armed Nancy Pelosi suddenly make me want to reconsider my position on gun control? I would recommend the next time you try to encourage people to embrace the 2nd Amendment you leave all references to lunatics like Nancy Pelosi out of it.
She's not likely armed herself.
but bringing up guns and Nancy Pelosi in any close proximity to one another just conjures up all sorts of nightmarish imagery, after all she's dangerous enough unarmed. 
Of course you don't.
You want meth heads to ride around with guns in their trunks...
Actually you want the meth heads to be the only armed people besides the police (who will arrive 5-10 minutes later, at best).
JoeB: "Only criminals should be armed, because I am a limp wristed mary boy afraid of tubes that go bang!"
So you want a meth head to gun down a grandfather at a gas station?
Drug Deal gone bad or not, the man had no right to approach and assault the woman. He should have kept his hands to himself. He might be alive today if he had.
So liberty is a privilege? You're going to have to prove that!
Drug Deal gone bad or not, the man had no right to approach and assault the woman. He should have kept his hands to himself. He might be alive today if he had.
Or they might have slapped each other around a bit until the cops came and broke it up.
Now he's dead and she's facing probable murder charges.
How is this good for anyone again?
Drug Deal gone bad or not, the man had no right to approach and assault the woman. He should have kept his hands to himself. He might be alive today if he had.
Or they might have slapped each other around a bit until the cops came and broke it up.
Now he's dead and she's facing probable murder charges.
How is this good for anyone again?
It's good for this woman because she wasn't brutally raped & murdered. She's still alive. We'll see if they charge her with murder. I'm leaning towards believing that won't happen. But who knows? There are a lot of Anti-2nd Amendment assholes out there. I could see them trying to prosecute her.
Or they might have slapped each other around a bit until the cops came and broke it up.
Now he's dead and she's facing probable murder charges.
How is this good for anyone again?
It's good for this woman because she wasn't brutally raped & murdered. She's still alive. We'll see if they charge her with murder. I'm leaning towards believing that won't happen. But who knows? There are a lot of Anti-2nd Amendment assholes out there. I could see them trying to prosecute her.
Except that he wasn't trying to "rape" her. He was someone she smoked dope with on a regular basis and he owed her $30.00. That's what they were arguing about.
It's good for this woman because she wasn't brutally raped & murdered. She's still alive. We'll see if they charge her with murder. I'm leaning towards believing that won't happen. But who knows? There are a lot of Anti-2nd Amendment assholes out there. I could see them trying to prosecute her.
Except that he wasn't trying to "rape" her. He was someone she smoked dope with on a regular basis and he owed her $30.00. That's what they were arguing about.
All irrelevant. He should have kept his hands to himself. His decision to engage in violence was a fatal error in judgement. He paid for it with his life.
