Women in Mini-Skirts Drive Islamists to Plot Bomb Blast at Holy Mosque

[Statistikhengst]

It's amazing the amount of hate displayed here towards muslims because of a bombing at a mosque in a country on the other side of the world. ..

There is no hate, there is disgust that people think it OK to murder over the way people dress. There is disgust at the level of violence directed at women because you can. Women will be stoned to death for looking at a man who is not her husband or family, but a man can have multiple affairs and it's OK because he's a guy.

That's absurd, and yet that is the system you wish to impose here...in my country....FUCK THAT!

 

[BobPlumb]

I want to see these women in miniskirts for myself.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I just lol'ed. A bunch of retards.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I want to see these women in miniskirts for myself.

Me too,

but these men seem to be homosexuals.

 

[Pogo]

Pogo, goes right to the Christian thing. Timothy McVeigh was not Christian. He was agnostic. He made the statement many times to newspapers. He also said “science is my religion.” McVeigh was Catholic as a young child, but never really practiced the religion. He told the authors of American Terrorist that he “did not believe in Hell.” If there’s one tenet that’s consistent with Christian religions, it’s a belief in Hell---and Heaven, for that matter.

We all know the reason the activist old media perpetuate this myth. They want so badly to blame a terrorist attack on a Christian. For the record---have I mentioned this yet? Timothy McVeigh the terrorist who planted the bomb at the Murrah Federal Building that killed 165 people back in 1995 was not a Christian.

Pogo says "religion" and of course in a predictable liberal fashion, brings up OKC bombing. Predictable isn't it?

Do Christians systematically stone women to death for BEING RAPED? Does the Christian faith have ministers calling for the killing and beheadings of the infidel?

Why am I even communicating with pogo. Notice the muslim is thanking him too. A microcosm of what enables these people to get away with their murders around the world.

Let me know pogo if you want me to make a list of murders carried out by muslim fanatics who were carrying out what their holy book commands them to do.

Pathetic liberals are pathetic.

No, Pogo went right to the logic thing. Specifically the shifting bases of reasoning, where any number of terrorists/murderers who happen to be Christian are indicted for their political acts, not their religion (and rightly so) and yet the minute it involves an Arab, whether he's religious or not -- suuuuuuuudenly it's all about "religion", not politics.

As I always say -- having it both ways: priceless.

Why am I even communicating with pogo. [sic]

Oh don't worry. You're not.

I have never seen you insult muslims. When did you do that?

Uhhhh.... never. Is this a trick question? I've never insulted anybody's religion. I'll insult your illlogic eight ways to Sunday though. Thanks for the easy targets.

I dare you to carry an image of Muhammed in a jar of piss. I dare you pogo. Please do it pogo.

Uh, no thanks - I have more productive uses for my piss. Keep your freaky fantasies to yourself. And close your mouth. Eww.

McVeigh was no Christian and he did not carry out the acts on behalf of any faith.

Then on what basis do we claim the 9/11 guys did?

Again -- when "we" do it it's a political act by a wacko and he doesn't represent his religion; when "they" do it it's a religious act entirely and he doesn't represent any kind of politics?

Soooooo.... why the double standard then?

 

[Pogo]

I want to see these women in miniskirts for myself.

Hell, that's all I clicked in here for. Now I get accosted by a perv who wants golden showers.

 

[Sunni Man]

It's amazing the amount of hate displayed here towards muslims because of a bombing at a mosque in a country on the other side of the world. ..

There is no hate, there is disgust that people think it OK to murder over the way people dress. There is disgust at the level of violence directed at women because you can. Women will be stoned to death for looking at a man who is not her husband or family, but a man can have multiple affairs and it's OK because he's a guy.

That's absurd, and yet that is the system you wish to impose here...in my country....FUCK THAT!

I personally have no problem with sharia law.

Eventually, parts of it will be woven into the U.S. legal system.

How much and how soon remains to be seem.

But it will happen.........

 

[Theowl32]

Then on what basis do we claim the 9/11 guys did?

Again -- when "we" do it it's a political act by a wacko and he doesn't represent his religion; when "they" do it it's a religious act entirely and he doesn't represent any kind of politics?

Soooooo.... why the double standard then?

Wait wait, you are claiming in your typical pathetic way that the OKC bombing was carried out for religious purposes but the 19 terrorists were not carrying out their jihad for religious purposes?

You have to love these double talking pieces of shit. The funny thing is pogo thinks he is being all clever.

http://www.islamforpeace.org/quran.html

The Quran:
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle, as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. Here is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-" This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah" Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had the power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

Quran (9:14) - "Fight them, Allah will punish them by your hands and bring them to disgrace..."

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad". The context is obviously holy war.

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place." This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them" This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).

Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."

Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." How does the Quran define a true believer?

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).


The 19 terrorists are honored........in those stink countries.

Pogo, you are a piece of shit.

 

[Pogo]

Then on what basis do we claim the 9/11 guys did?

Again -- when "we" do it it's a political act by a wacko and he doesn't represent his religion; when "they" do it it's a religious act entirely and he doesn't represent any kind of politics?

Soooooo.... why the double standard then?

ISLAM for peace

<snipped>


The 19 terrorists are honored........in those stink countries.

Pogo, you are a piece of shit.

So .... you're saying because you found this image on the internet ..... that makes "the 19" religious freaks? There were more than 19 btw but you're not supposed to know that.

Wanna see some biblical quotes I can put up next to Tim McVeigh's name, proving equally nothing except that both exist? Shall we start with, say, Leviticus? And why are we centred on McVeigh to the exclusion of Rudolph and Roeder and John Salvi and The Reverend Paul Jennings Hill? Inconvenient, are they?

But thanks for these. You've thus confirmed the double standard I noted. You still can't answer the question: why do we only bring up terrorists' religion when they're non-Christian?

Having it both ways: priceless.

 

[westwall]

To me it's amazing the way, McVeigh bombs OKC, oh that's "poitical" ... Rudolph bombs abortion clinics and lesbian bars, oh that's "political"... Roeder shoots Tiller point blank in church, oh that's "political", even though they're all professed Christians... yet a squad of terrorists who may or may not have even been religious do a 9/11 and suddenly -- new plan, it's all about "religion" now.

No one, and I mean no one I know has ever said that what those animals did was acceptable. Why do you continually defend those who do those things?

 

[Unkotare]

Pogo, goes right to the Christian thing. Timothy McVeigh was not Christian. He was agnostic. He made the statement many times to newspapers. He also said “science is my religion.” McVeigh was Catholic as a young child, but never really practiced the religion. He told the authors of American Terrorist that he “did not believe in Hell.” If there’s one tenet that’s consistent with Christian religions, it’s a belief in Hell---and Heaven, for that matter.

We all know the reason the activist old media perpetuate this myth. They want so badly to blame a terrorist attack on a Christian. For the record---have I mentioned this yet? Timothy McVeigh the terrorist who planted the bomb at the Murrah Federal Building that killed 165 people back in 1995 was not a Christian.

Pogo says "religion" and of course in a predictable liberal fashion, brings up OKC bombing. Predictable isn't it?

Do Christians systematically stone women to death for BEING RAPED? Does the Christian faith have ministers calling for the killing and beheadings of the infidel?

Why am I even communicating with pogo. Notice the muslim is thanking him too. A microcosm of what enables these people to get away with their murders around the world.

Let me know pogo if you want me to make a list of murders carried out by muslim fanatics who were carrying out what their holy book commands them to do.

Pathetic liberals are pathetic.

No, Pogo went right to the logic thing. ...

Pogo isn't very familiar at all with "the logic thing." A false comparison is not logical.

 

[westwall]

When guy murders a bunch of people at the post office, mall, or movie theater.......it's called work place violence by a deranged mentally ill man.

But if a deranged man who happens to be a muslim shoots up a bunch of people and shouts Allahu Akbar.......he is said to be perfectly sane and normal. ...

I think ANYONE who murders people is insane to some degree. It is NOT NORMAL to murder people. Those who do then blame religion are merely lying. Face it...there are some humanoids who are sadists, or predators, who just want an excuse to do the evil they enjoy.

They would do it regardless they just seek the socially acceptable (to them) reason to do it.

 

[westwall]

It's amazing the amount of hate displayed here towards muslims because of a bombing at a mosque in a country on the other side of the world. ..

There is no hate, there is disgust that people think it OK to murder over the way people dress. There is disgust at the level of violence directed at women because you can. Women will be stoned to death for looking at a man who is not her husband or family, but a man can have multiple affairs and it's OK because he's a guy.

That's absurd, and yet that is the system you wish to impose here...in my country....FUCK THAT!

I personally have no problem with sharia law.

Eventually, parts of it will be woven into the U.S. legal system.

How much and how soon remains to be seem.

But it will happen.........

No, no it won't. That is specifically what the separation of Church and State was referring to. Not the bullshit the militant atheists sue people over all the time. Much more likely is another Hulegu will be born, and he will bring the radical Islamists to their knees like he did the Old Man of the Mountain.

 

[Pogo]

To me it's amazing the way, McVeigh bombs OKC, oh that's "poitical" ... Rudolph bombs abortion clinics and lesbian bars, oh that's "political"... Roeder shoots Tiller point blank in church, oh that's "political", even though they're all professed Christians... yet a squad of terrorists who may or may not have even been religious do a 9/11 and suddenly -- new plan, it's all about "religion" now.

No one, and I mean no one I know has ever said that what those animals did was acceptable. Why do you continually defend those who do those things?

And what did I "defend" besides logic? Where have I made a value judgment on the acts themselves? Where did I even hint that any of it was "acceptable"? Where?

I just want this double standard of reasoning acknowledged. That's it.

 

[Sunni Man]

There is no hate, there is disgust that people think it OK to murder over the way people dress. There is disgust at the level of violence directed at women because you can. Women will be stoned to death for looking at a man who is not her husband or family, but a man can have multiple affairs and it's OK because he's a guy.

That's absurd, and yet that is the system you wish to impose here...in my country....FUCK THAT!

I personally have no problem with sharia law.

Eventually, parts of it will be woven into the U.S. legal system.

How much and how soon remains to be seem.

But it will happen.........

No, no it won't. That is specifically what the separation of Church and State was referring to. Not the bullshit the militant atheists sue people over all the time. Much more likely is another Hulegu will be born, and he will bring the radical Islamists to their knees like he did the Old Man of the Mountain.

It won't happen militarily or by armed conflict.

The muslims will make it happen thru the courts and and the voting booth........slowly and methodical..... all democratic and legal.. ..

 

[westwall]

I personally have no problem with sharia law.

Eventually, parts of it will be woven into the U.S. legal system.

How much and how soon remains to be seem.

But it will happen.........

No, no it won't. That is specifically what the separation of Church and State was referring to. Not the bullshit the militant atheists sue people over all the time. Much more likely is another Hulegu will be born, and he will bring the radical Islamists to their knees like he did the Old Man of the Mountain.

It won't happen militarily or by armed conflict.

The muslims will make it happen thru the courts and and the voting booth........slowly and methodical..... all democratic and legal.. ..

Good luck with that. Something about the COTUS preventing that particular bit of BS gives me comfort. Like I said, there's a new Hulegu coming...better make plans for his arrival.

 

[Sunni Man]

That's why the Constitution allows Amendments to be added in order to adjust to political and societal in our country. ..

 

[toastman]

No, no it won't. That is specifically what the separation of Church and State was referring to. Not the bullshit the militant atheists sue people over all the time. Much more likely is another Hulegu will be born, and he will bring the radical Islamists to their knees like he did the Old Man of the Mountain.

It won't happen militarily or by armed conflict.

The muslims will make it happen thru the courts and and the voting booth........slowly and methodical..... all democratic and legal.. ..

Good luck with that. Something about the COTUS preventing that particular bit of BS gives me comfort. Like I said, there's a ne Hulegu coming...better make plans for his arrival.

Lol you're actually taking this fool serious??
He himself knows very well that Muslims will never be a majority in the U.S and that even if the Muslim population does increase dramatically, they're simply not smart enough to emerge themselves in high government positions.
Not to mention that Americans would never go for that Shitia Law.

Sunni Man has been acting extremely delirious since he lost his rep meter

 

[Moonglow]

Mini skirts gives me get a boner..
Mini skirts gives Muslims a bomber...

 

[Jarlaxle]

Now we post a picture at the entrance describing proper attire for visiter's who wish to come in and tour the mosque.

Basically, no shorts, long sleeve shirts buttoned up to the neck, and a head scarf for the women. ..

I much prefer my wife in what she wore Friday: T-shirt, Carhart work pants, boots, and short-sleeve safety shirt. As usual, she wore a sun visor, with hair reaching her waist even from a topknot.

I would love to see the reaction if one of the yahoos from your mosque called for a wrecker on a hot day, and the wrecker driver was a woman in a halter top & shorts! I married a damned attractive woman...why the hell wouldn't I want to see her?!