tinydancer
Diamond Member
You do know that that is his adopted daughter, not Soon Yi?
Are you claiming that baby girl on his lap is Dylan?
My how she changed over the years.
![]()
Perv and Soon Yi have adopted two girls I believe. And that is what Dr Grump is saying. That kid on his lap is one of the adopted girls. NOT Soon Yi. Not Dylan. His NEW adopted child.
I linked directly to the article that had that picture as Soon Yi.
By the way, I just found the actual court documents denying Woody Allen any and all visitation rights with the children.
And the Court is scathing in their review of his relationship with Soon Yi and believe that there was a case to be made on the molestation of Dylan.
Check this out. Oh man this is killer.
As we noted above, Mr. Allen maintains that Ms. Farrow's allegations concerning the sexual abuse of Dylan were fabricated by Ms. Farrow both as a result of her rage over his relationship with Ms. Previn and as part of her continued plan to alienate him from his children.
However, our review of the record militates against a finding that Ms. Farrow fabricated the allegations without any basis.
Unlike the court at IAS, we do not consider the conclusions reached by Doctors Coates and Schultz and by the Yale-New Haven team, to be totally unpersuasive.
While the tendency of Dylan to withdraw into a fantasy and the inconsistencies in her account of the events of August 4, 1992, noted particularly by the Yale-New Haven team, must be taken into account in the evaluation of these serious allegations, the testimony given at trial by the individuals caring for the children that day, the videotape of Dylan made by Ms. Farrow the following day and the accounts of Dylan's behavior toward Mr. Allen both before and after the alleged instance of abuse, suggest that the abuse did occur.
YOWZAH!
ALLEN v. FARROW | Leagle.com