World Jewish Population Statistics

[Penelope]

Turf battles follow Haredi population surge in NY

New York's Orthodox Jews are expanding into these towns, and some residents aren’t happy - Jewish Telegraphic Agency

 

[irosie91]

It stays overall constant.
That’s in the Torah.
God does not want us to be haught due to numbers.

No it doesn't. The baby boom capital of the US is the orthodox jews in NY. The Torah is wrong, and the torah does not know what God wants.

Penny----if EVERY ultra-ortho jew in New York City had 25 children------that would STILL NOT CONSTITUTE A NEW
YORK BABY BOOOM-------because there are so few of them-----the baby booom is New York City is based on baby rate of teenaged Hispanic girls------and---that of muslims. Did you
pass first grade arithmetic?

Please I know someone in NY who said the orthodox are taking over her community. Two or more families living in a house and calling it a synagogue.

I know someone who told me that you molest the neighborhood cats. I am intrigued----you know someone in a neighborhood in
New York that has a house in which two or more families live? It is clear that you have never been in New York. For those who have never been in New York City----MOST of the residential houses are BUILT as "multifamily" residences. It is a response
to the fact that New York City has lots of PORTS and a history of industry. Someone told me that the stench emanating from
Penny's ass permeates the whole neighborhood in which she lives

Yes she is going to move before the take over her neighborhood.

who? your neighbor who insists that the stink from your ass is taking over the neighborhood?

 

[irosie91]

oh that's UPSTATE NY------yes----the land of the same Nazis that hanged blacks from trees and telephone poles in the early
part of the 20th century. Good to know that Penelope ascribes to THAT GROUP

 

[rightwinger]

https://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/world-jewish-population.htm

Jews represented 0.2% of the world population as of 2002.

Estimates indicate that the above percentage hardly changed by 2016.

Doesn’t matter

They still rule the world...just like God intended

 

[irosie91]

^ repeaping what she has sown.

What have I sown?

early 20th century------your kind hanged black refugees from southern oppression from telephone poles and trees in New York

 

[hobelim]

I mentioned that Jesus said, "Eat this", an allegory.. I agreed with you... The NT is allegory.

You took it as a personal attack... You actually think that you won something... lol



Fascinating!

And has nothing to offer.

I can offer this...a redirection to the question that you avoided answering, quite clumsily I might add.

Do you really believe that a person can be defiled or become holy, AS GOD IS HOLY, by eating or abstaining from certain foods?


A simple yes or no will do.

Don't be shy.. A world full of ignorant goyim are in dire need of divine guidance.

HaShev says we need to rebuild the Temple, install him as the messiah and high priest, (because his name is Michael), and begin to slaughter farm animals again in jerusalem to bring about world peace because God is a really big fan of the bring your own plate backyard barbecue....

Is that a good Idea?

If a person eats turkey bacon can they be saved or is it kosher?

There are so many questions!

Don't clam up now Mr Bravado... I heard that clams are not kosher.

Next question...
Who was the first person to ever suggest the Tanach was an allegory?

Ahem... Why don't you answer the question put to you?

Do you really believe that a person can be defiled or become holy, AS GOD IS HOLY, by eating or abstaining from certain foods?


Its a simple question. Are you ashamed or something? You brag about studying for 30 years...

Is the question too difficult for such an expert?

A yes or no will do.

Yes.
When did the allegory nonsense come about?

Ok.. You believe that kashrut is a divine menu...Your perception of holiness is based upon what a person eats.


Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate ?

Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of teeming vermin who go down on all fours?

Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of anything that crawls on its belly?

Doesn't ring a bell? See Genesis 3:14......


Do you understand that following the law in the wrong way has the exact same death consequent as does worshipping and eating a triune mangod and that, whether Jew or Gentile, misleading people about the true subject and intent of God in giving the law amounts to murder?


No? See Genesis 3:14



The law was allegorical from the beginning. Kashrut has absolutely nothing whatever to do with food and never did.

People turned aside from the way that Moses taught to follow the law as soon as he died. At least according to your own scriptures.

 

[irosie91]

no

 

[rightwinger]

Our Jewish masters have done a wonderful job taking care of us

 

[hobelim]

Our Jewish masters have done a wonderful job taking care of us

Your insolence has been duly noted.

You are now under the watchful eye of the Zohan.

 

[rightwinger]

Our Jewish masters have done a wonderful job taking care of us

Your insolence has been duly noted.

You are now under the watchful eye of the Zohan.

I do not want to offend our Jewish masters

 

[hobelim]

Our Jewish masters have done a wonderful job taking care of us

Your insolence has been duly noted.

You are now under the watchful eye of the Zohan.

I do not want to offend our Jewish masters

Don't worry about that anymore....

 

[irosie91]

Our Jewish masters have done a wonderful job taking care of us

Your insolence has been duly noted.

You are now under the watchful eye of the Zohan.

I do not want to offend our Jewish masters

good boy goy

 

[ding]

Our Jewish masters have done a wonderful job taking care of us

Your insolence has been duly noted.

You are now under the watchful eye of the Zohan.

I do not want to offend our Jewish masters

good boy goy

Who strengthens you?

 

[irosie91]

Our Jewish masters have done a wonderful job taking care of us

Your insolence has been duly noted.

You are now under the watchful eye of the Zohan.

I do not want to offend our Jewish masters

good boy goy

Who strengthens you?

WONDER BREAD-------and spinach

 

[Indeependent]

And has nothing to offer.

I can offer this...a redirection to the question that you avoided answering, quite clumsily I might add.

Do you really believe that a person can be defiled or become holy, AS GOD IS HOLY, by eating or abstaining from certain foods?


A simple yes or no will do.

Don't be shy.. A world full of ignorant goyim are in dire need of divine guidance.

HaShev says we need to rebuild the Temple, install him as the messiah and high priest, (because his name is Michael), and begin to slaughter farm animals again in jerusalem to bring about world peace because God is a really big fan of the bring your own plate backyard barbecue....

Is that a good Idea?

If a person eats turkey bacon can they be saved or is it kosher?

There are so many questions!

Don't clam up now Mr Bravado... I heard that clams are not kosher.

Next question...
Who was the first person to ever suggest the Tanach was an allegory?

Ahem... Why don't you answer the question put to you?

Do you really believe that a person can be defiled or become holy, AS GOD IS HOLY, by eating or abstaining from certain foods?


Its a simple question. Are you ashamed or something? You brag about studying for 30 years...

Is the question too difficult for such an expert?

A yes or no will do.

Yes.
When did the allegory nonsense come about?

Ok.. You believe that kashrut is a divine menu...Your perception of holiness is based upon what a person eats.


Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate ?

Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of teeming vermin who go down on all fours?

Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of anything that crawls on its belly?

Doesn't ring a bell? See Genesis 3:14......


Do you understand that following the law in the wrong way has the exact same death consequent as does worshipping and eating a triune mangod and that, whether Jew or Gentile, misleading people about the true subject and intent of God in giving the law amounts to murder?


No? See Genesis 3:14



The law was allegorical from the beginning. Kashrut has absolutely nothing whatever to do with food and never did.

People turned aside from the way that Moses taught to follow the law as soon as he died. At least according to your own scriptures.

I asked you a question and you continue to bluff.

 

[Picaro]

The OT wasn't joking when it teaches its students about the pitifalls of arrogance and vanity.

Agreed.

Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure.

True. It was clear the Jewish Establishment had degenerated into self-absorption, obsessed with 'racial purity' and personal status, splitting up over starting wars against much larger foes in fits of stupid racial superiority delusions, against Babylonians, Assyrians, Persians and the like, not really any different the Nazi's 'Aryan' myths in motivation, despite any evidence at all that God chose them as a vehicle for their racial superiority or intellectual superiority, and then after those losses the remainder stagnated into impotence and dissipation. That's why after Malachi's time we see the rise of the Pharisees sect, Hillel, et al, and of course Jesus, and the Jewish Reformation, moving the agenda first implemented in Genesis on, to carry the theology on to the rest of the world, while the 'orthodox' devoted themselves to racist sniveling, irrelevant genealogies, self-isolation and bigotry, no longer relevant to Judaism any more. As someone said earlier, Jesus and the Gentile Jews are necessary for fulfilling the promises and bot the OT and NT covenants, really. The Jewish geniuses who wrote the NT were far more dynamic and knew the Laws far better than most, and needed to throw off the existing ossified and repressive hierarchy peddling false teachings in order t move on with the spread of the genuine teachings.

 

[irosie91]

The OT wasn't joking when it teaches its students about the pitifalls of arrogance and vanity.

Agreed.

Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure.

True. It was clear the Jewish Establishment had degenerated into self-absorption, obsessed with 'racial purity' and personal status, splitting up over starting wars against much larger foes in fits of stupid racial superiority delusions, against Babylonians, Assyrians, Persians and the like, not really any different the Nazi's 'Aryan' myths in motivation, despite any evidence at all that God chose them as a vehicle for their racial superiority or intellectual superiority, and then after those losses the remainder stagnated into impotence and dissipation. That's why after Malachi's time we see the rise of the Pharisees sect, Hillel, et al, and of course Jesus, and the Jewish Reformation, moving the agenda first implemented in Genesis on, to carry the theology on to the rest of the world, while the 'orthodox' devoted themselves to racist sniveling, irrelevant genealogies, self-isolation and bigotry, no longer relevant to Judaism any more. As someone said earlier, Jesus and the Gentile Jews are necessary for fulfilling the promises and bot the OT and NT covenants, really. The Jewish geniuses who wrote the NT were far more dynamic and knew the Laws far better than most, and needed to throw off the existing ossified and repressive hierarchy peddling false teachings in order t move on with the spread of the genuine teachings.

from where did you cull this utterly idiotic analysis? I really like that ".....as someone said....." Can you describe the "ossified and repressive hierarchy ..." of the time that the putative Jesus lived?-----how about the "false teaching peddling...." ? The jews who contributed to the writing of the NT -----were no geniuses-------the people called JOHN did know how to use existing Hebrew poetry and imagery. The stuff reliably attributed to the putative Jesus----was simply ---HILLEL

 

[irosie91]

what your source really did PIC------made an unsuccessful attempt to render every ROMAN EMPIRE SERVING word found in the NT to be an utterly correct representation of "JUDEA" at the time of the putative life-time of "JESUS"-----a kind of Monday morning sophistry

 

[hobelim]

I can offer this...a redirection to the question that you avoided answering, quite clumsily I might add.

Do you really believe that a person can be defiled or become holy, AS GOD IS HOLY, by eating or abstaining from certain foods?


A simple yes or no will do.

Don't be shy.. A world full of ignorant goyim are in dire need of divine guidance.

HaShev says we need to rebuild the Temple, install him as the messiah and high priest, (because his name is Michael), and begin to slaughter farm animals again in jerusalem to bring about world peace because God is a really big fan of the bring your own plate backyard barbecue....

Is that a good Idea?

If a person eats turkey bacon can they be saved or is it kosher?

There are so many questions!

Don't clam up now Mr Bravado... I heard that clams are not kosher.

Next question...
Who was the first person to ever suggest the Tanach was an allegory?

Ahem... Why don't you answer the question put to you?

Do you really believe that a person can be defiled or become holy, AS GOD IS HOLY, by eating or abstaining from certain foods?


Its a simple question. Are you ashamed or something? You brag about studying for 30 years...

Is the question too difficult for such an expert?

A yes or no will do.

Yes.
When did the allegory nonsense come about?

Ok.. You believe that kashrut is a divine menu...Your perception of holiness is based upon what a person eats.


Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate ?

Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of teeming vermin who go down on all fours?

Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of anything that crawls on its belly?

Doesn't ring a bell? See Genesis 3:14......


Do you understand that following the law in the wrong way has the exact same death consequent as does worshipping and eating a triune mangod and that, whether Jew or Gentile, misleading people about the true subject and intent of God in giving the law amounts to murder?


No? See Genesis 3:14



The law was allegorical from the beginning. Kashrut has absolutely nothing whatever to do with food and never did.

People turned aside from the way that Moses taught to follow the law as soon as he died. At least according to your own scriptures.

I asked you a question and you continue to bluff.

Bluff? lol.. I never gamble..

I answered your question..

The law was allegorical from the beginning. Kashrut has absolutely nothing whatever to do with food and never did.

Would you like me to show you how?

 

[irosie91]

Next question...
Who was the first person to ever suggest the Tanach was an allegory?

Ahem... Why don't you answer the question put to you?

Do you really believe that a person can be defiled or become holy, AS GOD IS HOLY, by eating or abstaining from certain foods?


Its a simple question. Are you ashamed or something? You brag about studying for 30 years...

Is the question too difficult for such an expert?

A yes or no will do.

Yes.
When did the allegory nonsense come about?

Ok.. You believe that kashrut is a divine menu...Your perception of holiness is based upon what a person eats.


Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate ?

Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of teeming vermin who go down on all fours?

Do you see no deeper implications in the command to refrain from the flesh of anything that crawls on its belly?

Doesn't ring a bell? See Genesis 3:14......


Do you understand that following the law in the wrong way has the exact same death consequent as does worshipping and eating a triune mangod and that, whether Jew or Gentile, misleading people about the true subject and intent of God in giving the law amounts to murder?


No? See Genesis 3:14



The law was allegorical from the beginning. Kashrut has absolutely nothing whatever to do with food and never did.

People turned aside from the way that Moses taught to follow the law as soon as he died. At least according to your own scriptures.

I asked you a question and you continue to bluff.

Bluff? lol.. I only gamble when the fix is in...

I answered your question..

The law was allegorical from the beginning. Kashrut has absolutely nothing whatever to do with food and never did.

Would you like me to show you how?

go for it, Hobie-----give us the "how to make bacon" process utilized by Abraham