Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The FBI did not "basically" tell social media to remove dissenting opinions and posts. Is that what your media is telling you?
You have a good point about college speakers, but that issue died years ago and was always a very minor issue.
What do you think should be done about the problem?Now we're finding out the FBI met with social media editors once a week. What did they go there for, the free coffee?
It's all going to come out and it should be a doozy given Musk has only been the boss there for a few weeks and we haven't heard from any of the 14 FBI agents turned whistleblowers yet. I'm sure there is much more to come.
They went there to talk about foreign interference into our elections...What did they go there for, the free coffee?
If the whole Internet is controlled by one ideology and no alternative is allowed, then there is no Free Speech or free exchange of ideas. Of course a Totalitarian Society can be stable for a long time, but everyone who values Freedom must oppose the rise of Totalitarianism by every legal means.You haven't described anything that violates anyone's freedom. I don't really give a shit what social media companies do. But both sides of the duopoly want to control social media - that's clear.
And how do you propose to deal with the problem?If the whole Internet is controlled by one ideology and no alternative is allowed, then there is no Free Speech or free exchange of ideas. Of course a Totalitarian Society can be stable for a long time, but everyone who values Freedom must oppose the rise of Totalitarianism by every legal means.
Racist screedThere are jobs and many of them where the shit has to be cleaned up. There ais a small percentage who are asses in doing it. Government jobs in these costs a few times more than needed. Due to quotas, diversity and affirmative action. The people who abuse others need to go. Then we deal with this.
1) Elon Musk and architects of Free Speech Media are dealing with the problem right now.And how do you propose to deal with the problem?
Yep. I'm not a Republican, but I'll do my part!1) Elon Musk and architects of Free Speech Media are dealing with the problem right now.
2) Republicans should muster the art of boycott to pressure Social Media companies to allow diversity of viewpoints.
Nope. If you think the government is indirectly controlling social media, I don't see how giving them direct control over social media would help. Sounds like dumb piled on dumb.2) Anyone who supports Freedom should support any Republican initiative to legislatively penalize Social Media companies which are particularly censorious. Banning TikTok from USA has been suggested.
Thank you!Yep. I'll do my part!
If there is an initiative to ban TikTok from USA for [insert reason], I would support it 100% and vote for it.Nope. If you think the government is indirectly controlling social media, I don't see how giving them direct control over social media would help. Sounds like dumb piled on dumb.
And when progressives are in charge, should they be allowed to do likewise and ban social media companies that they don't like?Thank you!
If there is an initiative to ban TikTok from USA for [insert reason], I would support it 100% and vote for it.
The Democrats are a radical socialist party with a romantic view of communism.You really are pumping out that propaganda. What's the difference from what they're doing and what you're doing? Not much.
You're creating a fantasy enemy, the "Socialist Communists" as the whole of the Democratic Party. There are Socialists and Communists on the far left of the party, but that's all it is, a fringe movement. The only reason it happens is because of the electoral system that leads to a two party system and everything to the left needs to fit in that system, same as the Republican Party with their fascists, libertarians, Tea Party and others all fitting into the same party.
That you say that the party is the extreme of that party is worrying, it's a narrative, a false narrative, being pushed because the electoral system is all about negative voting. You push a negative view of the Democratic Party to try and convince those people in the middle that they shouldn't vote for the Dems, and the Dems are doing the same thing. So at the end of the day both sides just fling shit at each other, like you're doing.
They will definitely try to. They did everything to deplatform Parler and Gab.And when progressives are in charge, should they be allowed to do likewise and ban social media companies that they don't like?
Parler and Gab are platforms.They will definitely try to. They did everything to deplatform Parler and Gab.
I guess overt Racism and anti-Semitism should be banned.Parler and Gab are platforms.
They still exist as disgusting little corners of fringe racist internet. Especially Gab where antisemitism runs wild.
THAT might start here>>>>And how do you propose to deal with the problem?
www.bloomberg.com
Suppose Progressives win the Culture War. Then every website including this one will be faced with a choice of either banning anyone who disagrees with Progressives or being thrown off Internet.
This will not be achieved by government action, but by pressure on Social Media, web hosting providers, DDoS mitigation companies, etc. Thus the First Amendment will not be violated. Nevertheless, anyone who disagrees with Progressives will have no platform anywhere online.
Will that be a Free Society?
They went there to talk about foreign interference into our elections...
...which is illegal.
What do you think should be done about the problem?
I think social media platforms have the right to determine what kind of community and standards they adhere to.I guess overt Racism and anti-Semitism should be banned.
Sadly many Progressives work hard to ban legitimate views and Human Rights activism.
