Would ANY Bush Basher care to refute these statements???

[PaintMyHouse]

Clinton did try to kill him. He had to wait until after the attacks of the Embassies in Africa and after Bin Laden admitted his involvement in those attacks. It was only at that point that the FBI and CIA gave certification for approval for his assassination, a legal requirement. Clinton launched 98 cruise missiles in the attack It is believed at least one strike missed Bin Laden by only about one hour. Republicans in Congress claimed it was an attempt to draw attention away from impeachment and the Star investigation. They threatened a new round of investigations and compared it to a popular movie titled "Wag The Dog". Intelligence agencies feared those investigations would have brought unwanted attention to their secretive operations.
How come you don't know this stuff.

He could've got laden, he was worried about his approval numbers. Why don't you remember that?

I seem to remember Republicans claiming that Clintons warnings about bin Laden were just attempts by Clinton to distract the country from its Blow Job Trial. Remember "wag the dog"?

I guess you're right, he got the blow job out of the papers, but didn't bother to get laden. When he had the chance. The reason, because liberals would've hated laden to be killed. To a liberal anything good for the country is bad. Another reason not to elect a president that makes his decisions on polls.

It was Bush who pulled his troops back in Tora Bora and allowed bin Laden to excape into Pakistan

Made sense actually. Bush realized that killing or capturing bin Laden in 2002 would have caused the American public to consider the war on terror to be over. America wouldn't have bought his invade Iraq rhetoric if bin Laden was dead.
And we know Bush wasn't going to jeopardize his Iraq invasion

So you think if Bush killed bin Laden the war would've been over? Bush did say he was worried more about defeating the terrorists, than concentrating on one man. He had laden on the run. Anyway his intelligence ended up getting laden. Thanks president Bush.

To say you are a partisan hack, a Bush apologist, doesn't even begin to describe how far off the rails you actually are.

 

[jknowgood]

He could've got laden, he was worried about his approval numbers. Why don't you remember that?

I seem to remember Republicans claiming that Clintons warnings about bin Laden were just attempts by Clinton to distract the country from its Blow Job Trial. Remember "wag the dog"?

I guess you're right, he got the blow job out of the papers, but didn't bother to get laden. When he had the chance. The reason, because liberals would've hated laden to be killed. To a liberal anything good for the country is bad. Another reason not to elect a president that makes his decisions on polls.

It was Bush who pulled his troops back in Tora Bora and allowed bin Laden to excape into Pakistan

Made sense actually. Bush realized that killing or capturing bin Laden in 2002 would have caused the American public to consider the war on terror to be over. America wouldn't have bought his invade Iraq rhetoric if bin Laden was dead.
And we know Bush wasn't going to jeopardize his Iraq invasion

So you think if Bush killed bin Laden the war would've been over? Bush did say he was worried more about defeating the terrorists, than concentrating on one man. He had laden on the run. Anyway his intelligence ended up getting laden. Thanks president Bush.

To say you are a partisan hack, a Bush apologist, doesn't even begin to describe how far off the rails you actually are.

I supported the Iraq war, we should've taken Saddam out the first time. I don't agree with everything Bush did. Like listening to liberals on the war. We should've went in did the job and left. Like we used to do. Left a small force to make sure it didn't turn out like it did. When Obama successfully ended it.

 

[healthmyths]

Bush either lied or was just plain stupid
He botched his decision to abandon the war on terror to attack Iraq
He botched his assessment of WMDs
He botched his evaluation of the population treating us as liberators
He botched his assesment of the probability of starting a civil war
He underestimated US Casualties
He underestimated the time we would need to be in Iraq
He underestimated the number of troops needed to keep the peace
He underestimated the amount of allied support

So Clinton was stupid also? Oh and Hillary supported the war. You want her to be the next president, a war monger?

Bush proposed the war and Bush was the decider

It was his call to make and he blew it

Lol, you need to think of obama the same instead of giving him a pass on blaming Bush. Just think if Clinton would've made the right decision, and took laden out when he had the chance. There would've been no 911 and no wars. That's what we get when a president runs his administration on polls.

In spite of numerous opportunities, President Obama has avoided putting boots on the ground

Clinton fired a cruise missile at bin Laden and missed. Bush allowed him to escape into Pakistan and then stopped chasing him

Thankfully, President Obama got him

By intelligence using water boarding, thanks Bush for thinking of the safety of America's. If Obama wouldn't do what needs to be done to protect America.

Bush didn't lie, can't you get that talking point out of your head?

Bush either lied or was just plain stupid
He botched his decision to abandon the war on terror to attack Iraq
He botched his assessment of WMDs
He botched his evaluation of the population treating us as liberators
He botched his assesment of the probability of starting a civil war
He underestimated US Casualties
He underestimated the time we would need to be in Iraq
He underestimated the number of troops needed to keep the peace
He underestimated the amount of allied support

So Clinton was stupid also? Oh and Hillary supported the war. You want her to be the next president, a war monger?

Bush proposed the war and Bush was the decider

It was his call to make and he blew it

Lol, you need to think of obama the same instead of giving him a pass on blaming Bush. Just think if Clinton would've made the right decision, and took laden out when he had the chance. There would've been no 911 and no wars. That's what we get when a president runs his administration on polls.

Clinton did try to kill him. He had to wait until after the attacks of the Embassies in Africa and after Bin Laden admitted his involvement in those attacks. It was only at that point that the FBI and CIA gave certification for approval for his assassination, a legal requirement. Clinton launched 98 cruise missiles in the attack It is believed at least one strike missed Bin Laden by only about one hour. Republicans in Congress claimed it was an attempt to draw attention away from impeachment and the Star investigation. They threatened a new round of investigations and compared it to a popular movie titled "Wag The Dog". Intelligence agencies feared those investigations would have brought unwanted attention to their secretive operations.
How come you don't know this stuff.

Bill Clinton Said The Day Before 9/11 He Could Have Killed Bin Laden
Chilling audio of former President Bill Clinton admitting that he turned down an opportunity to attack Osama bin Laden during his presidency was recently uncovered by Sky News Australia. The audio was recorded on September 10, 2001, one day before the 9/11 attacks which claimed nearly 3,000 lives and dramatically impacted the course of global history.

“I could have killed him, but I would have had to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children,” Clinton said. “And then I would have been no better than him.”

Sky News obtained this footage of the former U.S. President through former Australian politician Michael Kroger.
Bill Clinton Said The Day Before 9 11 He Could Have Killed Bin Laden

 

[jknowgood]

So Clinton was stupid also? Oh and Hillary supported the war. You want her to be the next president, a war monger?

Bush proposed the war and Bush was the decider

It was his call to make and he blew it

Lol, you need to think of obama the same instead of giving him a pass on blaming Bush. Just think if Clinton would've made the right decision, and took laden out when he had the chance. There would've been no 911 and no wars. That's what we get when a president runs his administration on polls.

In spite of numerous opportunities, President Obama has avoided putting boots on the ground

Clinton fired a cruise missile at bin Laden and missed. Bush allowed him to escape into Pakistan and then stopped chasing him

Thankfully, President Obama got him

By intelligence using water boarding, thanks Bush for thinking of the safety of America's. If Obama wouldn't do what needs to be done to protect America.

Bush either lied or was just plain stupid
He botched his decision to abandon the war on terror to attack Iraq
He botched his assessment of WMDs
He botched his evaluation of the population treating us as liberators
He botched his assesment of the probability of starting a civil war
He underestimated US Casualties
He underestimated the time we would need to be in Iraq
He underestimated the number of troops needed to keep the peace
He underestimated the amount of allied support

So Clinton was stupid also? Oh and Hillary supported the war. You want her to be the next president, a war monger?

Bush proposed the war and Bush was the decider

It was his call to make and he blew it

Lol, you need to think of obama the same instead of giving him a pass on blaming Bush. Just think if Clinton would've made the right decision, and took laden out when he had the chance. There would've been no 911 and no wars. That's what we get when a president runs his administration on polls.

Clinton did try to kill him. He had to wait until after the attacks of the Embassies in Africa and after Bin Laden admitted his involvement in those attacks. It was only at that point that the FBI and CIA gave certification for approval for his assassination, a legal requirement. Clinton launched 98 cruise missiles in the attack It is believed at least one strike missed Bin Laden by only about one hour. Republicans in Congress claimed it was an attempt to draw attention away from impeachment and the Star investigation. They threatened a new round of investigations and compared it to a popular movie titled "Wag The Dog". Intelligence agencies feared those investigations would have brought unwanted attention to their secretive operations.
How come you don't know this stuff.

Bill Clinton Said The Day Before 9/11 He Could Have Killed Bin Laden
Chilling audio of former President Bill Clinton admitting that he turned down an opportunity to attack Osama bin Laden during his presidency was recently uncovered by Sky News Australia. The audio was recorded on September 10, 2001, one day before the 9/11 attacks which claimed nearly 3,000 lives and dramatically impacted the course of global history.

“I could have killed him, but I would have had to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children,” Clinton said. “And then I would have been no better than him.”

Sky News obtained this footage of the former U.S. President through former Australian politician Michael Kroger.
Bill Clinton Said The Day Before 9 11 He Could Have Killed Bin Laden

Now you did it, they are now going back to media matters to get some new talking points. Lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

Bush either lied or was just plain stupid
He botched his decision to abandon the war on terror to attack Iraq
He botched his assessment of WMDs
He botched his evaluation of the population treating us as liberators
He botched his assesment of the probability of starting a civil war
He underestimated US Casualties
He underestimated the time we would need to be in Iraq
He underestimated the number of troops needed to keep the peace
He underestimated the amount of allied support

So Clinton was stupid also? Oh and Hillary supported the war. You want her to be the next president, a war monger?

Bush proposed the war and Bush was the decider

It was his call to make and he blew it

Lol, you need to think of obama the same instead of giving him a pass on blaming Bush. Just think if Clinton would've made the right decision, and took laden out when he had the chance. There would've been no 911 and no wars. That's what we get when a president runs his administration on polls.

Why would killing or capturing Bin Laden in the nineties eliminated the possibility of a 9/11?

He was the master mind of 911, or did you forget?

Then why was Khalid Sheikh Muhammed identified as the architect of the 9/11 attack?

 

[Camp]

So Clinton was stupid also? Oh and Hillary supported the war. You want her to be the next president, a war monger?

Bush proposed the war and Bush was the decider

It was his call to make and he blew it

Lol, you need to think of obama the same instead of giving him a pass on blaming Bush. Just think if Clinton would've made the right decision, and took laden out when he had the chance. There would've been no 911 and no wars. That's what we get when a president runs his administration on polls.

In spite of numerous opportunities, President Obama has avoided putting boots on the ground

Clinton fired a cruise missile at bin Laden and missed. Bush allowed him to escape into Pakistan and then stopped chasing him

Thankfully, President Obama got him

By intelligence using water boarding, thanks Bush for thinking of the safety of America's. If Obama wouldn't do what needs to be done to protect America.

Bush either lied or was just plain stupid
He botched his decision to abandon the war on terror to attack Iraq
He botched his assessment of WMDs
He botched his evaluation of the population treating us as liberators
He botched his assesment of the probability of starting a civil war
He underestimated US Casualties
He underestimated the time we would need to be in Iraq
He underestimated the number of troops needed to keep the peace
He underestimated the amount of allied support

So Clinton was stupid also? Oh and Hillary supported the war. You want her to be the next president, a war monger?

Bush proposed the war and Bush was the decider

It was his call to make and he blew it

Lol, you need to think of obama the same instead of giving him a pass on blaming Bush. Just think if Clinton would've made the right decision, and took laden out when he had the chance. There would've been no 911 and no wars. That's what we get when a president runs his administration on polls.

Clinton did try to kill him. He had to wait until after the attacks of the Embassies in Africa and after Bin Laden admitted his involvement in those attacks. It was only at that point that the FBI and CIA gave certification for approval for his assassination, a legal requirement. Clinton launched 98 cruise missiles in the attack It is believed at least one strike missed Bin Laden by only about one hour. Republicans in Congress claimed it was an attempt to draw attention away from impeachment and the Star investigation. They threatened a new round of investigations and compared it to a popular movie titled "Wag The Dog". Intelligence agencies feared those investigations would have brought unwanted attention to their secretive operations.
How come you don't know this stuff.

Bill Clinton Said The Day Before 9/11 He Could Have Killed Bin Laden
Chilling audio of former President Bill Clinton admitting that he turned down an opportunity to attack Osama bin Laden during his presidency was recently uncovered by Sky News Australia. The audio was recorded on September 10, 2001, one day before the 9/11 attacks which claimed nearly 3,000 lives and dramatically impacted the course of global history.

“I could have killed him, but I would have had to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children,” Clinton said. “And then I would have been no better than him.”

Sky News obtained this footage of the former U.S. President through former Australian politician Michael Kroger.
Bill Clinton Said The Day Before 9 11 He Could Have Killed Bin Laden

What is the point? Is it a bad thing that an American President would not kill three hundred innocent women and children as collateral damage?

 

[jknowgood]

So Clinton was stupid also? Oh and Hillary supported the war. You want her to be the next president, a war monger?

Bush proposed the war and Bush was the decider

It was his call to make and he blew it

Lol, you need to think of obama the same instead of giving him a pass on blaming Bush. Just think if Clinton would've made the right decision, and took laden out when he had the chance. There would've been no 911 and no wars. That's what we get when a president runs his administration on polls.

Why would killing or capturing Bin Laden in the nineties eliminated the possibility of a 9/11?

He was the master mind of 911, or did you forget?

Then why was Khalid Sheikh Muhammed identified as the architect of the 9/11 attack?

Who was bin laden then?

 

[rdean]

You are with us or with the terrorists.

That's how Bush "GOT" the Democrats. He made them anti patriotic. Then when every single one of his policies failed, the GOP blamed Democrats for not stopping them. What a bunch of irresponsible creeps.

 

[rightwinger]

Clinton did try to kill him. He had to wait until after the attacks of the Embassies in Africa and after Bin Laden admitted his involvement in those attacks. It was only at that point that the FBI and CIA gave certification for approval for his assassination, a legal requirement. Clinton launched 98 cruise missiles in the attack It is believed at least one strike missed Bin Laden by only about one hour. Republicans in Congress claimed it was an attempt to draw attention away from impeachment and the Star investigation. They threatened a new round of investigations and compared it to a popular movie titled "Wag The Dog". Intelligence agencies feared those investigations would have brought unwanted attention to their secretive operations.
How come you don't know this stuff.

He could've got laden, he was worried about his approval numbers. Why don't you remember that?

I seem to remember Republicans claiming that Clintons warnings about bin Laden were just attempts by Clinton to distract the country from its Blow Job Trial. Remember "wag the dog"?

I guess you're right, he got the blow job out of the papers, but didn't bother to get laden. When he had the chance. The reason, because liberals would've hated laden to be killed. To a liberal anything good for the country is bad. Another reason not to elect a president that makes his decisions on polls.

It was Bush who pulled his troops back in Tora Bora and allowed bin Laden to excape into Pakistan

Made sense actually. Bush realized that killing or capturing bin Laden in 2002 would have caused the American public to consider the war on terror to be over. America wouldn't have bought his invade Iraq rhetoric if bin Laden was dead.
And we know Bush wasn't going to jeopardize his Iraq invasion

So you think if Bush killed bin Laden the war would've been over? Bush did say he was worried more about defeating the terrorists, than concentrating on one man. He had laden on the run. Anyway his intelligence ended up getting laden. Thanks president Bush.

No

I believe that if Bush had killed bin Laden in 2002 like he could have, he never would have gotten his war in Iraq

That is why he was so unenthusiastic about getting bin Laden

 

[jknowgood]

He could've got laden, he was worried about his approval numbers. Why don't you remember that?

I seem to remember Republicans claiming that Clintons warnings about bin Laden were just attempts by Clinton to distract the country from its Blow Job Trial. Remember "wag the dog"?

I guess you're right, he got the blow job out of the papers, but didn't bother to get laden. When he had the chance. The reason, because liberals would've hated laden to be killed. To a liberal anything good for the country is bad. Another reason not to elect a president that makes his decisions on polls.

It was Bush who pulled his troops back in Tora Bora and allowed bin Laden to excape into Pakistan

Made sense actually. Bush realized that killing or capturing bin Laden in 2002 would have caused the American public to consider the war on terror to be over. America wouldn't have bought his invade Iraq rhetoric if bin Laden was dead.
And we know Bush wasn't going to jeopardize his Iraq invasion

So you think if Bush killed bin Laden the war would've been over? Bush did say he was worried more about defeating the terrorists, than concentrating on one man. He had laden on the run. Anyway his intelligence ended up getting laden. Thanks president Bush.

No

I believe that if Bush had killed bin Laden in 2002 like he could have, he never would have gotten his war in Iraq

That is why he was so unenthusiastic about getting bin Laden

So killing bin laden would've made Saddam obey the un sanctions?

 

[AceRothstein]

I seem to remember Republicans claiming that Clintons warnings about bin Laden were just attempts by Clinton to distract the country from its Blow Job Trial. Remember "wag the dog"?

I guess you're right, he got the blow job out of the papers, but didn't bother to get laden. When he had the chance. The reason, because liberals would've hated laden to be killed. To a liberal anything good for the country is bad. Another reason not to elect a president that makes his decisions on polls.

It was Bush who pulled his troops back in Tora Bora and allowed bin Laden to excape into Pakistan

Made sense actually. Bush realized that killing or capturing bin Laden in 2002 would have caused the American public to consider the war on terror to be over. America wouldn't have bought his invade Iraq rhetoric if bin Laden was dead.
And we know Bush wasn't going to jeopardize his Iraq invasion

So you think if Bush killed bin Laden the war would've been over? Bush did say he was worried more about defeating the terrorists, than concentrating on one man. He had laden on the run. Anyway his intelligence ended up getting laden. Thanks president Bush.

To say you are a partisan hack, a Bush apologist, doesn't even begin to describe how far off the rails you actually are.

I supported the Iraq war, we should've taken Saddam out the first time. I don't agree with everything Bush did. Like listening to liberals on the war. We should've went in did the job and left. Like we used to do. Left a small force to make sure it didn't turn out like it did. When Obama successfully ended it.

When did we do the job and leave? We're still in Germany, Japan and South Korea.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Bush proposed the war and Bush was the decider

It was his call to make and he blew it

Lol, you need to think of obama the same instead of giving him a pass on blaming Bush. Just think if Clinton would've made the right decision, and took laden out when he had the chance. There would've been no 911 and no wars. That's what we get when a president runs his administration on polls.

Why would killing or capturing Bin Laden in the nineties eliminated the possibility of a 9/11?

He was the master mind of 911, or did you forget?

Then why was Khalid Sheikh Muhammed identified as the architect of the 9/11 attack?

Who was bin laden then?

ONE of the major players in the gang.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Liberation could and actually was used to describe a coup, civil uprising, civil war or regime change instigated with and by internal forces. Invasion has a different meaning. It refers to troops violently or forcefully entering a country or region.

The long list of statements made by various politicians were refuted and explained over a decade ago. There just always seems to be someone who regurgitates them and refuses to face reality. The statements used are either obsolete, having become null and void after changes occurred due to time and changing events, misrepresentation (lies) or misguided trust of the Bush/Cheney administration and misuse of the legislation given to Bush to conduct the invasion.
The Bush/Cheney defenders are screaming and whining that because people believed their lies and misrepresentations it isn't Bush/Cheney lies responsible for the war, the responsibility goes to those who believed the lies and misrepresentations.

Bush didn't lie, can't you get that talking point out of your head?

I isn't a lie. I is an accepted fact of history. It became facts of history when years after the invasion and occupation of Iraq, claims that were made were proven to be false. Bush claimed in his State of the Union Address following 9/11 that Iraq was aiding and protecting al Qaeda. That has proven beyond any doubt to have been a lie. He might not have connected Saddam to 9/11, but he claimed Saddam was in collusion with the terrorist group that was.

The main reason we went to war was because Saddam refused to comply with un resolutions. Bush gave Saddam plenty of time to comply. Saddam lied, so he died.

That did not make war necessary.

 

[jknowgood]

I guess you're right, he got the blow job out of the papers, but didn't bother to get laden. When he had the chance. The reason, because liberals would've hated laden to be killed. To a liberal anything good for the country is bad. Another reason not to elect a president that makes his decisions on polls.

It was Bush who pulled his troops back in Tora Bora and allowed bin Laden to excape into Pakistan

Made sense actually. Bush realized that killing or capturing bin Laden in 2002 would have caused the American public to consider the war on terror to be over. America wouldn't have bought his invade Iraq rhetoric if bin Laden was dead.
And we know Bush wasn't going to jeopardize his Iraq invasion

So you think if Bush killed bin Laden the war would've been over? Bush did say he was worried more about defeating the terrorists, than concentrating on one man. He had laden on the run. Anyway his intelligence ended up getting laden. Thanks president Bush.

To say you are a partisan hack, a Bush apologist, doesn't even begin to describe how far off the rails you actually are.

I supported the Iraq war, we should've taken Saddam out the first time. I don't agree with everything Bush did. Like listening to liberals on the war. We should've went in did the job and left. Like we used to do. Left a small force to make sure it didn't turn out like it did. When Obama successfully ended it.

When did we do the job and leave? We're still in Germany, Japan and South Korea.

December 18, 2011 is when the last soldier left iraq. Obama bragged about successfully ending the iraq war around that time.

 

[jknowgood]

Liberation could and actually was used to describe a coup, civil uprising, civil war or regime change instigated with and by internal forces. Invasion has a different meaning. It refers to troops violently or forcefully entering a country or region.

The long list of statements made by various politicians were refuted and explained over a decade ago. There just always seems to be someone who regurgitates them and refuses to face reality. The statements used are either obsolete, having become null and void after changes occurred due to time and changing events, misrepresentation (lies) or misguided trust of the Bush/Cheney administration and misuse of the legislation given to Bush to conduct the invasion.
The Bush/Cheney defenders are screaming and whining that because people believed their lies and misrepresentations it isn't Bush/Cheney lies responsible for the war, the responsibility goes to those who believed the lies and misrepresentations.

Bush didn't lie, can't you get that talking point out of your head?

I isn't a lie. I is an accepted fact of history. It became facts of history when years after the invasion and occupation of Iraq, claims that were made were proven to be false. Bush claimed in his State of the Union Address following 9/11 that Iraq was aiding and protecting al Qaeda. That has proven beyond any doubt to have been a lie. He might not have connected Saddam to 9/11, but he claimed Saddam was in collusion with the terrorist group that was.

The main reason we went to war was because Saddam refused to comply with un resolutions. Bush gave Saddam plenty of time to comply. Saddam lied, so he died.

That did not make war necessary.

So you like to draw imaginary red lines and do nothing when they are crossed? Another reason we are the laughing stock of the world under Obama.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Liberation could and actually was used to describe a coup, civil uprising, civil war or regime change instigated with and by internal forces. Invasion has a different meaning. It refers to troops violently or forcefully entering a country or region.

The long list of statements made by various politicians were refuted and explained over a decade ago. There just always seems to be someone who regurgitates them and refuses to face reality. The statements used are either obsolete, having become null and void after changes occurred due to time and changing events, misrepresentation (lies) or misguided trust of the Bush/Cheney administration and misuse of the legislation given to Bush to conduct the invasion.
The Bush/Cheney defenders are screaming and whining that because people believed their lies and misrepresentations it isn't Bush/Cheney lies responsible for the war, the responsibility goes to those who believed the lies and misrepresentations.

Bush didn't lie, can't you get that talking point out of your head?

I isn't a lie. I is an accepted fact of history. It became facts of history when years after the invasion and occupation of Iraq, claims that were made were proven to be false. Bush claimed in his State of the Union Address following 9/11 that Iraq was aiding and protecting al Qaeda. That has proven beyond any doubt to have been a lie. He might not have connected Saddam to 9/11, but he claimed Saddam was in collusion with the terrorist group that was.

The main reason we went to war was because Saddam refused to comply with un resolutions. Bush gave Saddam plenty of time to comply. Saddam lied, so he died.

That did not make war necessary.

So you like to draw imaginary red lines and do nothing when they are crossed? Another reason we are the laughing stock of the world under Obama.

1. I don't want Americans dying in unnecessary wars. You do realize Americans died in Iraq, right? You talk as if you don't.

2. North Korea has been violating ceasefire agreements since the '50's.

 

[Kosh]

I guess you're right, he got the blow job out of the papers, but didn't bother to get laden. When he had the chance. The reason, because liberals would've hated laden to be killed. To a liberal anything good for the country is bad. Another reason not to elect a president that makes his decisions on polls.

It was Bush who pulled his troops back in Tora Bora and allowed bin Laden to excape into Pakistan

Made sense actually. Bush realized that killing or capturing bin Laden in 2002 would have caused the American public to consider the war on terror to be over. America wouldn't have bought his invade Iraq rhetoric if bin Laden was dead.
And we know Bush wasn't going to jeopardize his Iraq invasion

So you think if Bush killed bin Laden the war would've been over? Bush did say he was worried more about defeating the terrorists, than concentrating on one man. He had laden on the run. Anyway his intelligence ended up getting laden. Thanks president Bush.

To say you are a partisan hack, a Bush apologist, doesn't even begin to describe how far off the rails you actually are.

I supported the Iraq war, we should've taken Saddam out the first time. I don't agree with everything Bush did. Like listening to liberals on the war. We should've went in did the job and left. Like we used to do. Left a small force to make sure it didn't turn out like it did. When Obama successfully ended it.

When did we do the job and leave? We're still in Germany, Japan and South Korea.

And yes how many wars have been started by Germany since then?

But then again what does the far left know about history...

 

[jknowgood]

Bush didn't lie, can't you get that talking point out of your head?

I isn't a lie. I is an accepted fact of history. It became facts of history when years after the invasion and occupation of Iraq, claims that were made were proven to be false. Bush claimed in his State of the Union Address following 9/11 that Iraq was aiding and protecting al Qaeda. That has proven beyond any doubt to have been a lie. He might not have connected Saddam to 9/11, but he claimed Saddam was in collusion with the terrorist group that was.

The main reason we went to war was because Saddam refused to comply with un resolutions. Bush gave Saddam plenty of time to comply. Saddam lied, so he died.

That did not make war necessary.

So you like to draw imaginary red lines and do nothing when they are crossed? Another reason we are the laughing stock of the world under Obama.

1. I don't want Americans dying in unnecessary wars. You do realize Americans died in Iraq, right? You talk as if you don't.

2. North Korea has been violating ceasefire agreements since the '50's.

Yes I know, liberals counted their deaths daily until Obama was elected. They also died in vain in iraq, because of Obama.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I isn't a lie. I is an accepted fact of history. It became facts of history when years after the invasion and occupation of Iraq, claims that were made were proven to be false. Bush claimed in his State of the Union Address following 9/11 that Iraq was aiding and protecting al Qaeda. That has proven beyond any doubt to have been a lie. He might not have connected Saddam to 9/11, but he claimed Saddam was in collusion with the terrorist group that was.

The main reason we went to war was because Saddam refused to comply with un resolutions. Bush gave Saddam plenty of time to comply. Saddam lied, so he died.

That did not make war necessary.

So you like to draw imaginary red lines and do nothing when they are crossed? Another reason we are the laughing stock of the world under Obama.

1. I don't want Americans dying in unnecessary wars. You do realize Americans died in Iraq, right? You talk as if you don't.

2. North Korea has been violating ceasefire agreements since the '50's.

Yes I know, liberals counted their deaths daily until Obama was elected. They also died in vain in iraq, because of Obama.

Ah, so now you admit the war was unnecessary. Now you admit they died in vain.

Case closed. I've gotten you to concede I was right, and you were wrong.

 

[healthmyths]

Bush didn't lie, can't you get that talking point out of your head?

I isn't a lie. I is an accepted fact of history. It became facts of history when years after the invasion and occupation of Iraq, claims that were made were proven to be false. Bush claimed in his State of the Union Address following 9/11 that Iraq was aiding and protecting al Qaeda. That has proven beyond any doubt to have been a lie. He might not have connected Saddam to 9/11, but he claimed Saddam was in collusion with the terrorist group that was.

The main reason we went to war was because Saddam refused to comply with un resolutions. Bush gave Saddam plenty of time to comply. Saddam lied, so he died.

That did not make war necessary.

So you like to draw imaginary red lines and do nothing when they are crossed? Another reason we are the laughing stock of the world under Obama.

1. I don't want Americans dying in unnecessary wars. You do realize Americans died in Iraq, right? You talk as if you don't.

2. North Korea has been violating ceasefire agreements since the '50's.

YOU do realize that a Harvard study showed that when encouraging words like these were used the terrorists were (their words not mine!!) "emboldened"!
The Harvard Study asked: THE EMBOLDENMENT EFFECT
"Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war.
In Iraqi provinces that were broadly comparable in social and economic terms, attacks increased between 7 percent and 10 percent following what the researchers call "high-mention weeks," like the two just before the November 2006 election.
And these statements which idiots like YOU most likely agreed with did everything in the world to encourage recruit and reward the terrorists to continue.

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
NOTE: You are not that naive to think the terrorists didn't find Kerry calling OUR TROOPS terrorists absolutely EMBOLDENING???

Remember Kerry EARLIER wanted Bush to: "Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ....
to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ....
"Kerry , Jan. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
NOTE: Do you not believe the terrorists LOVED to hear our troops were cold blooded killers???

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

You can't convince me that the TERRORISTS were emboldened and encouraged and recruited more terrorists!
After all you idiots that bring up Abu Ghraib as a prime motivator for terrorists recruitment... HOW MUCH more with idiots like the above making those
terrible disgusting statements calling our troops "civilian killers"... "terrorists"!