Would blacks be better off without whites?

[Statistikhengst]

Saying you've never met a Black doctor isn't "racist", Stat. Much the same as saying you've never met a homosexual isn't 'homophobic'.

No. He just said he had also never been treated by a black doctor - and then he included the word "luckily".

That is racist.

He is saying that black doctors are inferior to white doctors, which is, of course, bullshit.

University of Maryland School of Medicine:

State Medical Licensing Exams, after this, these students become physicians and treat patients:

Your source?

 

[Swagger]

University of Maryland School of Medicine, just like it's written in the post you've quoted him on.

 

[Statistikhengst]

University of Maryland School of Medicine, just like it's written in the post you've quoted him on.

You provided no link. Why did you provide no link?

 

[Swagger]

You asked for a source, not a link. I've provided you with the source (which was staring you in the face).

 

[Statistikhengst]

You asked for a source, not a link. I've provided you with the source (which was staring you in the face).

No. He provided graphics. That is not a source. Graphics can be faked. Where is the source?

 

[Swagger]

I didn't provide any "graphics", Stat. I simply wrote what I read obove the charts Rikurzhen posted.

 

[Statistikhengst]

My question was aimed at Rikhurzhen, not you. Pay attention.

 

[Rikurzhen]

Your source?

The source of the first graphs is from this study.

Here is current data on ALL MCAT test-takers:

Here are the Medical School acceptance rates broken down by MCAT score and GPA. Note that the mean black MCAT score is 20.2. Unfortunately this statistic doesn't break down acceptance by race. Look at the column for MCAT 18-20. Of those with a 3.8-4.0 GPA, only 70 of 520 applicants were accepted. It would be helpful to review the race data on those 70 but knowing that Affirmative Action's lowered standards are in play, it's a very safe inference that blacks are disproportionately over-represented at the bottom of distribution.

 

[Swagger]

If your question was aimed at Rikurzhen, Stat, why did you quote me and not him?

 

[Rikurzhen]

Universities don't like releasing this type of info because it raises uncomfortable issues which make it difficult to defend Affirmative Action but sometimes information does leak out, like this graph:

 

[Statistikhengst]

I quoted him first, then you butt in.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Your source?

The source of the first graphs is from this study.

Here is current data on ALL MCAT test-takers:

Here are the Medical School acceptance rates broken down by MCAT score and GPA. Note that the mean black MCAT score is 20.2. Unfortunately this statistic doesn't break down acceptance by race. Look at the column for MCAT 18-20. Of those with a 3.8-4.0 GPA, only 70 of 520 applicants were accepted. It would be helpful to review the race data on those 70 but knowing that Affirmative Action's lowered standards are in play, it's a very safe inference that blacks are disproportionately over-represented at the bottom of distribution.

Thank you.

That is information from ONE University, right?

 

[Rikurzhen]

Your source?

The source of the first graphs is from this study.

Here is current data on ALL MCAT test-takers:

Here are the Medical School acceptance rates broken down by MCAT score and GPA. Note that the mean black MCAT score is 20.2. Unfortunately this statistic doesn't break down acceptance by race. Look at the column for MCAT 18-20. Of those with a 3.8-4.0 GPA, only 70 of 520 applicants were accepted. It would be helpful to review the race data on those 70 but knowing that Affirmative Action's lowered standards are in play, it's a very safe inference that blacks are disproportionately over-represented at the bottom of distribution.

Thank you.

That is information from ONE University, right?

The first link was to the University of Maryland study. The two color graphs are NATIONAL data compiled BY the College Board over two years. Look at the N.

 

[Statistikhengst]

It's a study from 2001, conducted before 2001!

That information is long outdated!

Jesus, have you racists no shame?!?!?

http://www.ceousa.org/attachments/article/653/MDMED.pdf

EMBARGOED
UNTIL
April 3, 2001

 

[Rikurzhen]

It's a study from 2001, conducted before 2001!

That information is long outdated!

Jesus, have you racists no shame?!?!?

The charts showed 1999 data. You didn't have to go to the study to find this out.

Jesus, you creationists are stupid.

You think human genetics changed since 2001?

 

[Swagger]

I quoted him first, then you butt in.

He wasn't around. I pointed you in the right direction. You tried to be clever, but you failed, hard. Must've been really embarrassing, too.

 

[Unkotare]

I'll tell you this. White people have about had their fill with ....

Who-the-fuck told you that YOU, of all people, speak for what "white people" have had their fill with? When the fuck were you elected spokesdouchebag? Speak for yourself, fool, because you don't 'represent' anything or anyone else.

 

[Unkotare]

Today everyone is assigned a legally-enforceable racial category by the government.....

No, they are not. You have repeated this lie many times now. Repeating a lie doesn't make it true.

 

[BillyP]

Blacks would be better off without whites because then they wouldn't look so dumb with a less amount of smarter people to compare themselves with.

 

[Friends]

Blacks would be worse off without whites because they have never been able to create or maintain a viable society. By "viable society" I mean a society with a low crime rate, a prosperous economy, and a well functioning government.

Whites would be better without blacks because the crime rate would be much lower. So would be the cost of the criminal justice system. Downtown areas of cities would be safe to live in.