Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because I drive to Lincoln, KC, and various other places all the time. I've already answered this question.
Hey, look! I'm licensed, registered, and insured so the government is reasonably sure I'm responsible enough to own and operate a vehicle that goes faster than 25 mph!!
Weird, huh?
M4s aren't either.drivings not a protected right,,
And now you've cleverly segued into outright lies.
Was speculation just not enough?
Anyway, we're done here.
Have a nice day.
M4s aren't either.
I did answer. At least twice. You responded with speculation, hyperbole, and lies.And you can't answer the questions....so you run away.....
Your reasoning falls apart with the slightest scrutiny, the mildest interrogation....
And like left wingers do, you run away.....
the 2nd A says they are,,M4s aren't either.
I did answer. At least twice. You responded with speculation, hyperbole, and lies.
Have a nice day.
Actually the federal government allows private ownership of many full-auto weapons although the process of getting the proper credentials can be expensive and lengthy. State and local governments are the major infringers of the 2nd Amendment. I have experience with the things and consider them just a really quick way to waste ammo. Running out of ammo in the middle of a serious social engagement is a major fax pas,The 2nd Amendment says you can legally own a full auto M4.
Yet you'd get arrested if the police found one in your possession.
What happened?
Why do you feel the need to ask? Any of your business? Paranoid much?Why do you feel you need to do a tremendous amount of damage in a very short time?
Actually the federal government allows private ownership of many full-auto weapons although the process of getting the proper credentials can be expensive and lengthy. State and local governments are the major infringers of the 2nd Amendment. I have experience with the things and consider them just a really quick way to waste ammo. Running out of ammo in the middle of a serious social engagement is a major fax pas,
Doesn't matter what you or I would allow. What the Constitution allows is what is important.
The 2nd Amendment says you can legally own a full auto M4.
Yet you'd get arrested if the police found one in your possession.
What happened?
Gun laws only affect the law abiding.No, I would not allow just anyone to own a full auto M-4.
There is a criminal element in society, and there are lunatics and there are men who love to kill.
And your premise is faulty. There are people who have a bloodlust.
BZZZZZT!!! I'm sorry, that's incorrect. We are living in a representative democracy.
Really. They are camped outside of your house aiming at you?
You proposed an unrealistic scenario and accused me of being unrealistic, because I would not even consider your "what if" fairy tale world in which you wished people to consider your proposition realisitically? Who you zoomin', man?You're the one being unrealistic.
While we would prefer if the government dealt with the "bad guys" for us and we would not have to, the reality is that government itself always also is or turns into the "bad guys".
If you pay for full auto for the government with your taxes, then you have to also ensure enough ordinary citizens have them as well, so that we do not end up like the Weimar Republic.
And anytime you allow government to get a monopoly on weapons, you eventually always end up like the Weimar Republic.
Sure there are always going to be some people who can not control themselves and can't be trusted with a full auto rifle, but those people also can not be trusted with a car, flammables, explosives, toxins, or anything else that all people have easy access to.
So the only way to deal with those dangerous people is to confine them under supervised conditions.
To instead try to turn the entire civilian population into a supervised condition that is denied access to full auto rifles, is to ensure a dictatorship.
There is no option.
Gun control does not work, never works, and is inherently in conflict with any democratic republic.
Read any history book, and they all tell you that all governments become corrupt over time and have to be destroyed by force.
It is inevitable, with none lasting longer than about 400 years, and most less than 100 or so.
The US government is no exception, and has been evil to the point is should have been destroyed, over 100 years ago, like the Spanish American War, the Philippine Rebellion, etc. The only reason we have not already been forced to act is that the corruption has been mostly aimed at people outside this country. Like Vietnamese, Iraqis, Libyans, Afghans, Egyptians, Syrians, etc. But there are millions being harmed in the US as well, such as those imprisoned by the illegal War on Drugs.
Just read the Bill of Right again. It is very clear. There can be no legal federal gun control laws. Totally impossible. And yet there are federal gun control laws? How is that possible, and why did we let that happen?
the 2nd A says they are,,
See, that's the kinda answer that would make anyone wonder.Why do you feel the need to ask? Any of your business? Paranoid much?
You stupid uneducated Moon Bats have a hellvea time not understanding what the words "shall not infringe" means, don't you?M4s aren't either.
We just lost a 20-year war to fucking Afghanistan.This is, again, pure speculation. Your ak isn't going to stop the US government if they decide to do bad things to you.
