Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S.Constitution?

[eagle7_31]

Carson does not support Sharia law

No American candidate does, or ever would! If they did, they would be a candidate for about 5 minutes. Carson's answer is a bullshit deflection from the question he was asked:

Could you ever see yourself supporting a Muslim for President.

He wasn't asked about Sharia.

Your grasping at straws (no surprise there) Carson has no problem with Muslims unless they are for Sharia law. That is what he said. You don't like, again that is your problem.

 

[bripat9643]

Carson does not support Sharia law

No American candidate does, or ever would! If they did, they would be a candidate for about 5 minutes. Carson's answer is a bullshit deflection from the question he was asked:

Could you ever see yourself supporting a Muslim for President.

He wasn't asked about Sharia.

In other words, most Americans hold the same attitude about Muslims as Ben Carson: they are disqualified from being President. You just shot down all the liberal turds piling onto Ben Carson.

 

[Wildman]

Anyone who would vote for a Muslim and their antiquated religion for POTUS is a class a fucking moron.

looks like there were 65,899,660 fucking morons in 2012AD

 

[Synthaholic]

Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S. Constitution?


The media is crowing in triumph after managing to catch Dr. Ben Carson in a "Gotcha" question.

First of all, there is no such thing as a gotcha question. You either can answer or you cannot. If you cannot, then explain why.

What political retards like you and Carson don't understand is someone who supported Sharia Law would never reach the necessary support to even win one state, never mind the nomination, never mind the general election.

Now answer this question: why are you and Carson political retards?

Your first sentence exposes your ignorance

How so?

 

[Synthaholic]

Carson does not support Sharia law

No American candidate does, or ever would! If they did, they would be a candidate for about 5 minutes. Carson's answer is a bullshit deflection from the question he was asked:

Could you ever see yourself supporting a Muslim for President.

He wasn't asked about Sharia.

Your grasping at straws (no surprise there) Carson has no problem with Muslims unless they are for Sharia law. That is what he said. You don't like, again that is your problem.

That's not what he said. That was his excuse later, once the shit hit the fan.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S. Constitution?


The media is crowing in triumph after managing to catch Dr. Ben Carson in a "Gotcha" question.

First of all, there is no such thing as a gotcha question. You either can answer or you cannot. If you cannot, then explain why.

What political retards like you and Carson don't understand is someone who supported Sharia Law would never reach the necessary support to even win one state, never mind the nomination, never mind the general election.

Now answer this question: why are you and Carson political retards?

Your first sentence exposes your ignorance

How so?

Gotcha questions are a two way street. Their only purpose is to corner people in an indefensible position. If you don't recognize that you don't belong on this website

 

[Synthaholic]

Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S. Constitution?


The media is crowing in triumph after managing to catch Dr. Ben Carson in a "Gotcha" question.

First of all, there is no such thing as a gotcha question. You either can answer or you cannot. If you cannot, then explain why.

What political retards like you and Carson don't understand is someone who supported Sharia Law would never reach the necessary support to even win one state, never mind the nomination, never mind the general election.

Now answer this question: why are you and Carson political retards?

Your first sentence exposes your ignorance

How so?

Gotcha questions are a two way street. Their only purpose is to corner people in an indefensible position. If you don't recognize that you don't belong on this website

What do you think was the gotcha question to Carson?

You will fail this because there are no gotcha questions.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S. Constitution?


The media is crowing in triumph after managing to catch Dr. Ben Carson in a "Gotcha" question.

First of all, there is no such thing as a gotcha question. You either can answer or you cannot. If you cannot, then explain why.

What political retards like you and Carson don't understand is someone who supported Sharia Law would never reach the necessary support to even win one state, never mind the nomination, never mind the general election.

Now answer this question: why are you and Carson political retards?

Your first sentence exposes your ignorance

How so?

Gotcha questions are a two way street. Their only purpose is to corner people in an indefensible position. If you don't recognize that you don't belong on this website

What do you think was the gotcha question to Carson?

You will fail this because there are no gotcha questions.

I would fail because you're a dumbfuck who hates anyone on the right.

 

[Avatar4321]

Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S. Constitution?

No, and that's why I'm not going to vote Republican.

Can you name a republican promoting sharia?

 

[Avatar4321]

And no. I wouldn't.

 

[Synthaholic]

First of all, there is no such thing as a gotcha question. You either can answer or you cannot. If you cannot, then explain why.

What political retards like you and Carson don't understand is someone who supported Sharia Law would never reach the necessary support to even win one state, never mind the nomination, never mind the general election.

Now answer this question: why are you and Carson political retards?

Your first sentence exposes your ignorance

How so?

Gotcha questions are a two way street. Their only purpose is to corner people in an indefensible position. If you don't recognize that you don't belong on this website

What do you think was the gotcha question to Carson?

You will fail this because there are no gotcha questions.

I would fail because you're a dumbfuck who hates anyone on the right.

See? You can't even identify the supposed gotcha question.

You know why? Because there are no gotcha questions! Especially if you are running for president.

 

[Synthaholic]

And no. I wouldn't.

But you would gladly support a Mormon, even though they believe that all other Christian denominations are abominations, and believe that god was a physical man who had physical sex with Mary, and believe that god lives on the planet Kolob.

How fucked up is that? And you're worried about a Muslim?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Your first sentence exposes your ignorance

How so?

Gotcha questions are a two way street. Their only purpose is to corner people in an indefensible position. If you don't recognize that you don't belong on this website

What do you think was the gotcha question to Carson?

You will fail this because there are no gotcha questions.

I would fail because you're a dumbfuck who hates anyone on the right.

See? You can't even identify the supposed gotcha question.

You know why? Because there are no gotcha questions! Especially if you are running for president.

Reverend Wright says you are one stupid motherfucker

 

[gallantwarrior]

Since sharia law would obviously supersede our established Constitutional law, hell NO!!
Where exactly do the LGBT, and feminizes stand on this question? Are they supportive of a presidential candidate who would prefer sharia law over constitutional law?

 

[gallantwarrior]

I wouldn't support a candidate who held that the ten commandments superseded the Constitution, either.

The problem with Carson's comments is that he seems to believes that all Muslims would hold Sharia above the Constitution.

Do you think Carson's wrong? Would a true Muslim hold sharia above the Constitution, or not?

 

[Syriusly]

Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S. Constitution?


The media is crowing in triumph after managing to catch Dr. Ben Carson in a "Gotcha" question.

They asked first if he would support a candidate whose views went against the Constitution. He gave the obvious answer: Of course not. (Never mind that this would cut out nearly every Democrat in elected office today.)

They then asked if he considered Muslim beliefs to be contrary to the Constitution. He correctly answered "Yes".

Then they asked if he would support a Muslim candidate for President. Rather than hedge, he flatly answered that he would not.

The media then jumped as far as they could, and are screaming that Dr. Carson would require a religious test for elected office, something forbidden by the Constitution.

When it's clear that Carson simply meant what he said: The he would not support anyone whose opinions and beliefs were contrary to the Constitution... whether those beliefs came from what he read in the newspaper this morning, or from his religion, or from what he was taught in public school, or from listening to Hillary. Doesn't matter WHY the guy held opinions that opposed the Constitution. If they did, then Dr. Carson would not support him, nor should he.

But the leftists are screaming with delight that they can twist what he said into something he obviously did NOT mean, and pretend he meant it. That's their bread and butter, no matter how false on disingenuous. And the leftists aren't about to give it up. In part because it's all they have.

So, let's ask generally:

Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S. Constitution?

Would you support a Presidential candidate who believed that the Pope had more authority than the U.S. Constitution?

 

[Syriusly]

Since sharia law would obviously supersede our established Constitutional law, hell NO!!
Where exactly do the LGBT, and feminizes stand on this question? Are they supportive of a presidential candidate who would prefer sharia law over constitutional law?

NO, hell NO and if that is not clear NO!

So, are YOU guilty of requiring a religious test for public office?

Actually there is no law against it. This is liberals attempting, once again, to re-write the constitution.

No laws for or against the free-expression of religion.

There is no law against a person being bigoted against a candidate because of their religion.

However, requiring a religious test in order to hold an office is unconstitutional.

Not that faux Conservatives like you care about that.

 

[Clementine]

I wouldn't support a candidate who held that the ten commandments superseded the Constitution, either.

The problem with Carson's comments is that he seems to believes that all Muslims would hold Sharia above the Constitution.

I think many of them would. Even Obama has issues with the constitution and has complained about it in the past. Now he tries to use his phone and pen to go around it.

He blatantly ignores immigration laws, which is putting his own beliefs above the constitution.

Muslims in Islamic countries do not have separation of religion and state because they are the same thing.

 

[Clementine]

Since sharia law would obviously supersede our established Constitutional law, hell NO!!
Where exactly do the LGBT, and feminizes stand on this question? Are they supportive of a presidential candidate who would prefer sharia law over constitutional law?

NO, hell NO and if that is not clear NO!

So, are YOU guilty of requiring a religious test for public office?

Actually there is no law against it. This is liberals attempting, once again, to re-write the constitution.

No laws for or against the free-expression of religion.

There is no law against a person being bigoted against a candidate because of their religion.

However, requiring a religious test in order to hold an office is unconstitutional.

Not that faux Conservatives like you care about that.

If a devout Muslim were running for president, they would lie about their beliefs to get elected. Once in office, they would probably seek out ways to get around the constitution, push foreign policies that favored other radical Muslims and would constantly accuse America of being Islamophobic. They wouldn't recognize the evil Muslims who murdered thousands on 9/11 and probably change it to a day of community service instead of a day of remembrance to the victims of radical Muslims. They would only tout Islam as peaceful and would never admit to the atrocities or human rights violations. They would bash anyone who pointed out the negative aspects of Islam.

They would push for other Muslims to come to America by way of insisting that we take in refugees without vetting any of them. They would lift restrictions and give favored traveler status to countries that are known to support terrorists.

So, knowing a person would lie their ass off, I'd say I wouldn't vote for a Muslim. Any religion that forces women to cover their bodies in shame and denies equal rights for them is a joke of a religion run by irrational men.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S. Constitution?


The media is crowing in triumph after managing to catch Dr. Ben Carson in a "Gotcha" question.

They asked first if he would support a candidate whose views went against the Constitution. He gave the obvious answer: Of course not. (Never mind that this would cut out nearly every Democrat in elected office today.)

They then asked if he considered Muslim beliefs to be contrary to the Constitution. He correctly answered "Yes".

Then they asked if he would support a Muslim candidate for President. Rather than hedge, he flatly answered that he would not.

The media then jumped as far as they could, and are screaming that Dr. Carson would require a religious test for elected office, something forbidden by the Constitution.

When it's clear that Carson simply meant what he said: The he would not support anyone whose opinions and beliefs were contrary to the Constitution... whether those beliefs came from what he read in the newspaper this morning, or from his religion, or from what he was taught in public school, or from listening to Hillary. Doesn't matter WHY the guy held opinions that opposed the Constitution. If they did, then Dr. Carson would not support him, nor should he.

But the leftists are screaming with delight that they can twist what he said into something he obviously did NOT mean, and pretend he meant it. That's their bread and butter, no matter how false on disingenuous. And the leftists aren't about to give it up. In part because it's all they have.

So, let's ask generally:

Would YOU support a Presidential candidate who held that Sharia Law superseded the U.S. Constitution?

Okay.

First a president swears to uphold the Constitution of the United States. Sharia law is incompatible with that. So are any other religious laws and tenets. All you need is read Article 6 Clause 2 of the US Constitution. All American law trumps any religious law for which any president, Muslim or Christian, follows.