Only if I wanted to see prayer rugs and Islamic educational materials in our public schools.Would you vote for a Muslim to be POTUS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only if I wanted to see prayer rugs and Islamic educational materials in our public schools.Would you vote for a Muslim to be POTUS
Yes, I would vote for an atheist.Would you vote for an Atheist?I would vote for a moderate Muslim...I would not vote for an extremist Muslim
I would also not vote for a fundamentalist Christian, Orthodox Jew or Scientologist
So you then admit that Carson's opinions are not a constitutional issue, even after having argued that they are.Mac1958, we don't apply religious tests for office.
But we certainly consider religious, agnostic, and atheistic values and ethics of those who run for office.
You folks just won't be honest about this.Sure, it does. We are not to consider religious tests for office. However, I would certainly consider the values of atheists, agnostics, anti-Godists, and theists carefully. I simply could not vote for any who had far right restrictive fundamental values that would restrict the rights of other citizens.This isn't a constitutionally-driven test. It's simply a question about how an individual would vote, that's it. This has nothing to do with constitutional law..The Constitution prohibits religious tests.
Article 6
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Carson did not say that a Muslim would not qualify. Again, Carson did not say that a Muslim would not qualify.
One more time, Carson did not say that a Muslim would not qualify.
He said that he would not vote for one: "I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation," Carson said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "I absolutely would not agree with that."
The PC Police have been blatantly dishonest about this story from the moment it broke, and it won't stop.
Why does just being honest have to be so goddamned difficult?
.
Yes, I would vote for an atheist.Would you vote for an Atheist?I would vote for a moderate Muslim...I would not vote for an extremist Muslim
I would also not vote for a fundamentalist Christian, Orthodox Jew or Scientologist
Sure, there are plenty of bigots on both ends of the spectrum. Stipulated.You folks just won't be honest about this.Sure, it does. We are not to consider religious tests for office. However, I would certainly consider the values of atheists, agnostics, anti-Godists, and theists carefully. I simply could not vote for any who had far right restrictive fundamental values that would restrict the rights of other citizens.This isn't a constitutionally-driven test. It's simply a question about how an individual would vote, that's it. This has nothing to do with constitutional law..The Constitution prohibits religious tests.
Article 6
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Carson did not say that a Muslim would not qualify. Again, Carson did not say that a Muslim would not qualify.
One more time, Carson did not say that a Muslim would not qualify.
He said that he would not vote for one: "I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation," Carson said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "I absolutely would not agree with that."
The PC Police have been blatantly dishonest about this story from the moment it broke, and it won't stop.
Why does just being honest have to be so goddamned difficult?
.
Agree
He did not say they do not qualify...he only admitted to being a bigot
JFK's Catholicism was a big issue back in the day. Anti-Catholic bigots thought he would be taking his marching orders from the Pope.Would you vote for a Muslim to be POTUS
...no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
You have to be pretty stupid to think that is what would happen.Only if I wanted to see prayer rugs and Islamic educational materials in our public schools.Would you vote for a Muslim to be POTUS
So you then admit that Carson's opinions are not a constitutional issue, even after having argued that they are.Mac1958, we don't apply religious tests for office.
But we certainly consider religious, agnostic, and atheistic values and ethics of those who run for office.
.
Just pointing out the blatant lies of the PC Police, sorry.So you then admit that Carson's opinions are not a constitutional issue, even after having argued that they are.Mac1958, we don't apply religious tests for office.
But we certainly consider religious, agnostic, and atheistic values and ethics of those who run for office.
.Make that argument. I said the article prohibts religious tests. I sad I considered values and ethics.
You are straining at passing a gnat and your sphincter is going to collapse. Google for a video of rectal prolapse to see what you are doing to yourself. It's not pretty.
You have every right to assert such. It would be better if you offered evidence.Just pointing out the blatant lies of the PC Police, sorry. Doesn't take much effort..So you then admit that Carson's opinions are not a constitutional issue, even after having argued that they are.Mac1958, we don't apply religious tests for office.
But we certainly consider religious, agnostic, and atheistic values and ethics of those who run for office.
.Make that argument. I said the article prohibts religious tests. I sad I considered values and ethics.
You are straining at passing a gnat and your sphincter is going to collapse. Google for a video of rectal prolapse to see what you are doing to yourself. It's not pretty.
"Would you vote for a Muslim as POTUS?"
Everyone who voted for Obama can skip this poll....you already DID!
I caught you in a blatant lie, and you don't like it.You have every right to assert such. It would be better if you offered evidence.Just pointing out the blatant lies of the PC Police, sorry. Doesn't take much effort..So you then admit that Carson's opinions are not a constitutional issue, even after having argued that they are.Mac1958, we don't apply religious tests for office.
But we certainly consider religious, agnostic, and atheistic values and ethics of those who run for office.
.Make that argument. I said the article prohibts religious tests. I sad I considered values and ethics.
You are straining at passing a gnat and your sphincter is going to collapse. Google for a video of rectal prolapse to see what you are doing to yourself. It's not pretty.
I'll stop voting for Mormons when they start blowing themselves up.I voted for a Mormon. What's the difference?
Should a Muslim be excluded from consideration because of religious affiliation? If Jeremiah Wright didn't get Barry excluded, the bar is so low that nobody can fall below it.
Of course you did not. One, I don't lie. Two, you can't dance. Three, assertion and opinion is not evidence. Fact.I caught you in a blatant lie, and you don't like it.You have every right to assert such. It would be better if you offered evidence.Just pointing out the blatant lies of the PC Police, sorry. Doesn't take much effort..So you then admit that Carson's opinions are not a constitutional issue, even after having argued that they are.Mac1958, we don't apply religious tests for office.
But we certainly consider religious, agnostic, and atheistic values and ethics of those who run for office.
.Make that argument. I said the article prohibts religious tests. I sad I considered values and ethics.
You are straining at passing a gnat and your sphincter is going to collapse. Google for a video of rectal prolapse to see what you are doing to yourself. It's not pretty.
Tell me Jake, what "evidence" am I lacking that I have not already provided?