SFC Ollie
Still Marching
2.25 seconds of what could be seen which was nothing but the facade. the stuff behind it had already fallen.
Did you have to go switch accounts?
Did you have to go switch accounts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2.25 seconds of what could be seen which was nothing but the facade. the stuff behind it had already fallen.
...Did you have to go switch accounts?
And you have sidestepped for the last time. Go play your stupidity elsewhere.
You cannot tell us what happened during the first 8 minutes of that colapse because it destroys the freefall of the whole building BS.
Anyone with common sense can see it...
But then that is obviously the problem...
BTW, are you an expert? Do tell us about your own qualifications since you wish to question everyone else.
gee you sound just like the last guy....
So I'll ask again.
Why do almost all truther videos omit those first 8 seconds?
Whatever, I don't give a rats ass if the building fell at freefall or as i have shown just the facade did. Or none at all...
What I do care about is that there was not any controlled demolition of the building.
There is zero proof of any such claim.
gee you sound just like the last guy....
So I'll ask again.
Why do almost all truther videos omit those first 8 seconds?
Not to concede your point, but it's totally irrelevant to the impossibility of any amount of free-fall (including the amount admitted by NIST) without the sort of mechanism mentioned in my previous post. My argument isn't based on the veracity of truther videos; it's based on the veracity of NIST's own admission.
What's been proven other than you are nuts?
Prove to us there is a conspiracy here and lets get it taken to court. Someone must be guilty.....
2.25 seconds of what could be seen which was nothing but the facade. the stuff behind it had already fallen.
The simultaneous failure of the "stuff behind" 8 floors (every last beam of structural steel across the breadth and height of that entire area) is every bit as impossible, minus a mechanism for the simultaneity of the removal of all resistance (on which NIST apparently knew better than to even try to postulate), as any amount of free-fall. Without that mechanism, the 8-floor concession is an admission of a physical impossibility by default.
2.25 seconds of what could be seen which was nothing but the facade. the stuff behind it had already fallen.
The simultaneous failure of the "stuff behind" 8 floors (every last beam of structural steel across the breadth and height of that entire area) is every bit as impossible, minus a mechanism for the simultaneity of the removal of all resistance (on which NIST apparently knew better than to even try to postulate), as any amount of free-fall. Without that mechanism, the 8-floor concession is an admission of a physical impossibility by default.
And that mechanism was what? An alien hyperbeam?
...Got it, you can leave now you've trashed everything to include physics which you claim are impossible....
What was your degree in again?