GuyPinestra
Senior Member
- Jan 29, 2012
- 6,905
- 673
- 48
No, but the Pentagon is...Whats the matter seems like no one can substantiate their crazy conspiracy theory that consists of what is in this entertaining little video?
9/11: A Conspiracy Theory - YouTube
Why can't any of you OCT NIST nuthuggers just come out and admit this is what you believe in???? It's all true isn't it???
So, let's see what we can in this video.
First, no, I don't think that Manhattan was the most heavily defended airspace in the world. Also, were all 4 of the airline pilots military combat trained? If so, did that training include hand to hand combat?
Try to get over the snarkiness, and focus on the absurdity the video highlights.The whole video is a snarky bunch of misrepresentation and loaded phrasing (did you stop beating your wife?) which, while it may be an attempting to respond to similar things directed at truthers, certainly does nothing to increase the video's credibility or persuasiveness. It also overshadows any truths that are, in fact, in the video and important.
I'm the one that said 'a couple dozen', and that's because 'grunts follow orders'. All the conspirators had to know was that AQ had a PLAN, they didn't have to work with them. Much of the demolition work could have been accomplished by DUPES, people who thought they were doing one thing when in fact they were doing another. How hard would it be to 'fireproof' steel beams with nano-thermate?I also wonder why, if the government could supposedly pull this off with no more than a couple of dozen people (someone in one of these 9/11 threads has said that), when Al Qaida is said to have done it it's the most sophisticated, elaborate terrorist operation ever. Hijacking the planes and flying them into buildings requires elaborate, sophisticated planning and execution, but adding the hidden use of demolitions to bring down the towers, as well as everything necessary to facilitate the cover-up afterwards, doesn't require more than 20 or 30 people?
Assuming we can agree that planes did, in fact, hit the towers, is it your contention that those planes were not hijacked by terrorists, but rather by agents of the US government willing to die for this plan? Or were the planes empty and remotely controlled? Or were there actually terrorists, but they were being manipulated by the US gov't? Or was this just a coincidence and the demolitions were in place as a contingency, then set off when the planes hit?
As usual, CT posters seem to equate disagreement with complete faith and trust in anything government. If you cannot see how that view is not only foolish, but incredibly limiting, there's probably no reason for anyone to have a discussion with you.
We can have a discussion...
Last edited: