PC thinks there is "essentially" no difference between North Korea and Vermont.
Technically their isn't.
The Governor of Vermont wears Member's Only jackets, like Kim Jong Fuck.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PC thinks there is "essentially" no difference between North Korea and Vermont.
Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.
But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."
In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:
"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales
Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.
It follows:
1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.
a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.
b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:
a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.
b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981
c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.
And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society
Read more- if you dare, Liberals.
You're running out of original crackpot ideas.
composition fallacy begins with "commmunism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism" are all the same thing.
They are not, and PC does not get to redefine traditional terms.
I'm thinkin' this thread belongs in the Badlands. Seems like an outright taunt to me anyway. Is there an Admin handy?
As will now become routine whenever PoliticalChic posts this Big Lie again and again, let me post what Hitler really thought about Marxism. All below is verbatim from 'Mein Kampf', not secondhand unsubstantiated musings from unknown musers:
"In this period my eyes were opened to two menaces of which I had previously scarcely known the names, and whose terrible importance for the existence of the German people I certainly did not understand:
Marxism and Jewry."
"Only a knowledge of the Jews provides the key with which to comprehend the inner, and consequently real, aims of Social Democracy.
The erroneous conceptions of the aim and meaning of this party fall from our eyes like veils, once we come to know this people, and from the fog and mist of social phrases rises the leering grimace of Marxism."
(Now take note in the above, where Hitler essentially says that it was a revelation to him that in reality, Social Democracy was no different than Marxism...
...and then compare that to the line that PoliticalChic has repeated again and again, including above -
"There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism."
Amazing eh, the similarity? I guess great minds think alike, as PC would say.)
Are you saying that PoliticalChic is a Nazi?
I would definitely agree...especially with her propensity towards hatefilled rhetoric.
What truth?I'm thinkin' this thread belongs in the Badlands. Seems like an outright taunt to me anyway. Is there an Admin handy?
Palpable fear of truth.
Typical.
great thread, better dead than red. where's tail gunner joe when we need him ?Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.
But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."
In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:
"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales
Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.
It follows:
1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.
a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.
b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:
a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.
b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981
c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.
And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society
Read more- if you dare, Liberals.
She has problems with race, religion, ethnicity, nationalism, political speech. I doubt she is a Nazi, but I do believe she would be inflamed with Mussolini if she were alive at that time.
Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.
But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."
In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:
"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales
Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.
It follows:
1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.
a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.
b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:
a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.
b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981
c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.
And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society
Read more- if you dare, Liberals.
It's probably useless but this is a good story
Why America’s Next President Will Not Be a Socialist
Could clear up some of your delusions
What truth?I'm thinkin' this thread belongs in the Badlands. Seems like an outright taunt to me anyway. Is there an Admin handy?
Palpable fear of truth.
Typical.
As will now become routine whenever PoliticalChic posts this Big Lie again and again, let me post what Hitler really thought about Marxism. All below is verbatim from 'Mein Kampf', not secondhand unsubstantiated musings from unknown musers:
"In this period my eyes were opened to two menaces of which I had previously scarcely known the names, and whose terrible importance for the existence of the German people I certainly did not understand:
Marxism and Jewry."
"Only a knowledge of the Jews provides the key with which to comprehend the inner, and consequently real, aims of Social Democracy.
The erroneous conceptions of the aim and meaning of this party fall from our eyes like veils, once we come to know this people, and from the fog and mist of social phrases rises the leering grimace of Marxism."
(Now take note in the above, where Hitler essentially says that it was a revelation to him that in reality, Social Democracy was no different than Marxism...
...and then compare that to the line that PoliticalChic has repeated again and again, including above -
"There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism."
Amazing eh, the similarity? I guess great minds think alike, as PC would say.)
Are you saying that PoliticalChic is a Nazi?
I would definitely agree...especially with her propensity towards hatefilled rhetoric.
Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.
But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."
In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:
"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales
Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.
It follows:
1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.
a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.
b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:
a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.
b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981
c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.
And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society
Read more- if you dare, Liberals.
It's probably useless but this is a good story
Why America’s Next President Will Not Be a Socialist
Could clear up some of your delusions
Try not to use vocabulary of whose definitions you are unaware.
Case in point: "delusion."
Can you point to any 'delusions' in the OP?
Now don't embarrass yourself again.
she just did, you wrote a poem about it.composition fallacy begins with "commmunism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism" are all the same thing.
They are not, and PC does not get to redefine traditional terms.
As will now become routine whenever PoliticalChic posts this Big Lie again and again, let me post what Hitler really thought about Marxism. All below is verbatim from 'Mein Kampf', not secondhand unsubstantiated musings from unknown musers:
"In this period my eyes were opened to two menaces of which I had previously scarcely known the names, and whose terrible importance for the existence of the German people I certainly did not understand:
Marxism and Jewry."
"Only a knowledge of the Jews provides the key with which to comprehend the inner, and consequently real, aims of Social Democracy.
The erroneous conceptions of the aim and meaning of this party fall from our eyes like veils, once we come to know this people, and from the fog and mist of social phrases rises the leering grimace of Marxism."
(Now take note in the above, where Hitler essentially says that it was a revelation to him that in reality, Social Democracy was no different than Marxism...
...and then compare that to the line that PoliticalChic has repeated again and again, including above -
"There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism."
Amazing eh, the similarity? I guess great minds think alike, as PC would say.)
Are you saying that PoliticalChic is a Nazi?
I would definitely agree...especially with her propensity towards hatefilled rhetoric.
Are you saying the truth hurts?
Tissue?
Wait, I just realized I'm in the OP. OP literally has absolutely no idea what they're talking about. I'm not a girl, first of all, and I'd hardly consider myself going far to the left.
Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.
But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.
How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."
In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:
"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales
Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.
It follows:
1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.
a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.
b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:
a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.
b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981
c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.
And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society
Read more- if you dare, Liberals.
It's probably useless but this is a good story
Why America’s Next President Will Not Be a Socialist
Could clear up some of your delusions
Try not to use vocabulary of whose definitions you are unaware.
Case in point: "delusion."
Can you point to any 'delusions' in the OP?
Now don't embarrass yourself again.
Yes, the delusion that Hitler was a Marxist.
Yes the delusion that there is no difference between a liberal and communist.